Zhipeng Shen, H. Zeng, Wujie Shi, Peiliang Zhang, Jianbin Weng, L. Pan, Chao Lin
{"title":"Efficacy of small-incision untethering surgery on tethered cord syndrome in children","authors":"Zhipeng Shen, H. Zeng, Wujie Shi, Peiliang Zhang, Jianbin Weng, L. Pan, Chao Lin","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1001-2346.2019.12.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo explore the efficacy and safety of small-incision untethering surgery in the treatment of tethered cord syndrome (TCS) in children. \n \n \nMethods \nWe retrospectively collected the clinical data of TCS patients who underwent merely untethering surgery at Department of Neurosurgery, Children′s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine from May 2015 to May 2018. A total of 72 cases were included and all required transection of merely terminal filament. Among them, there were 33 patients undergoing small-incision operation (small-incision group) and 39 undergoing traditional surgery (traditional group). Comparative analysis of intraoperative incision size, postoperative complications, length of stay and postoperative treatment effect were implemented in both groups. \n \n \nResults \nAll 72 patients underwent surgery successfully. None of the children in the small incision group needed to have the incision extended. In small-incision and tradition groups, the length of the incision was (2.5±0.3)cm and (4.8±1.9)cm respectively, and the length of stay was (4.4±1.8)days and (6.7±2.6)days respectively. Both differences were statistically significant (P 0.05). At the end of follow-up, the total effective rate in traditional group (> 6-41 months) was 89.7% (35/39), while that in small-incision group (>6-27 months) was 93.9% (31/33). There was no statistically difference between them (P>0.05). \n \n \nConclusion \nThe small-incision untethering for children with TCS who need merely transection of terminal filament seems as effective as traditional large-incision surgery. It has the advantages of small trauma and short length of stay. \n \n \nKey words: \nTethered cord syndrome; Child; Microsurgery; Minimally invasive","PeriodicalId":10100,"journal":{"name":"中华神经外科杂志","volume":"35 1","pages":"1226-1230"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华神经外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1001-2346.2019.12.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To explore the efficacy and safety of small-incision untethering surgery in the treatment of tethered cord syndrome (TCS) in children.
Methods
We retrospectively collected the clinical data of TCS patients who underwent merely untethering surgery at Department of Neurosurgery, Children′s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine from May 2015 to May 2018. A total of 72 cases were included and all required transection of merely terminal filament. Among them, there were 33 patients undergoing small-incision operation (small-incision group) and 39 undergoing traditional surgery (traditional group). Comparative analysis of intraoperative incision size, postoperative complications, length of stay and postoperative treatment effect were implemented in both groups.
Results
All 72 patients underwent surgery successfully. None of the children in the small incision group needed to have the incision extended. In small-incision and tradition groups, the length of the incision was (2.5±0.3)cm and (4.8±1.9)cm respectively, and the length of stay was (4.4±1.8)days and (6.7±2.6)days respectively. Both differences were statistically significant (P 0.05). At the end of follow-up, the total effective rate in traditional group (> 6-41 months) was 89.7% (35/39), while that in small-incision group (>6-27 months) was 93.9% (31/33). There was no statistically difference between them (P>0.05).
Conclusion
The small-incision untethering for children with TCS who need merely transection of terminal filament seems as effective as traditional large-incision surgery. It has the advantages of small trauma and short length of stay.
Key words:
Tethered cord syndrome; Child; Microsurgery; Minimally invasive
期刊介绍:
Chinese Journal of Neurosurgery is one of the series of journals organized by the Chinese Medical Association under the supervision of the China Association for Science and Technology. The journal is aimed at neurosurgeons and related researchers, and reports on the leading scientific research results and clinical experience in the field of neurosurgery, as well as the basic theoretical research closely related to neurosurgery.Chinese Journal of Neurosurgery has been included in many famous domestic search organizations, such as China Knowledge Resources Database, China Biomedical Journal Citation Database, Chinese Biomedical Journal Literature Database, China Science Citation Database, China Biomedical Literature Database, China Science and Technology Paper Citation Statistical Analysis Database, and China Science and Technology Journal Full Text Database, Wanfang Data Database of Medical Journals, etc.