Potere umano e mondo animale secondo Hobbes

IF 0.1 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Luc Foisneau
{"title":"Potere umano e mondo animale secondo Hobbes","authors":"Luc Foisneau","doi":"10.6092/ISSN.1825-9618/9614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article seeks to draw attention to the relevance of Hobbes' reflection on the place of man in the animal world. Since animals play no role in the theory of representation and no more in the theory of passions, it was concluded that power only concerns the relationships between human beings. This idea will have to be corrected by highlight-ing how the ability of humans to coordinate their actions is likely to produce a power effect within the animal world. Normal 0 14 false false false IT X-NONE X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ \n table.MsoNormalTable \n {mso-style-name:\"Tabella normale\"; \n mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; \n mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; \n mso-style-noshow:yes; \n mso-style-priority:99; \n mso-style-parent:\"\"; \n mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; \n mso-para-margin:0cm; \n mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; \n mso-pagination:widow-orphan; \n font-size:10.0pt; \n font-family:\"Calibri\",sans-serif; \n mso-bidi-font-family:\"Times New Roman\";} \n This article seeks to draw attention to the relevance of Hobbes' reflection on the place of man in the animal world. Since animals play no role in the theory of representation and no more in the theory of passions, it was concluded that power only concerns the relationships between human beings. This idea will have to be corrected by highlight-ing how the ability of humans to coordinate their actions is likely to produce a power effect within the animal world. Normal 0 14 false false false IT X-NONE X-NONE","PeriodicalId":41532,"journal":{"name":"Scienza & Politica-Per una Storia delle Dottrine","volume":"31 1","pages":"79-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scienza & Politica-Per una Storia delle Dottrine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6092/ISSN.1825-9618/9614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article seeks to draw attention to the relevance of Hobbes' reflection on the place of man in the animal world. Since animals play no role in the theory of representation and no more in the theory of passions, it was concluded that power only concerns the relationships between human beings. This idea will have to be corrected by highlight-ing how the ability of humans to coordinate their actions is likely to produce a power effect within the animal world. Normal 0 14 false false false IT X-NONE X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Tabella normale"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";} This article seeks to draw attention to the relevance of Hobbes' reflection on the place of man in the animal world. Since animals play no role in the theory of representation and no more in the theory of passions, it was concluded that power only concerns the relationships between human beings. This idea will have to be corrected by highlight-ing how the ability of humans to coordinate their actions is likely to produce a power effect within the animal world. Normal 0 14 false false false IT X-NONE X-NONE
霍布斯笔下的人类力量与动物世界
本文试图引起人们对霍布斯关于人在动物世界中的地位的思考的相关性的关注。由于动物在表征理论中没有作用,在激情理论中也没有作用,因此得出的结论是,权力只涉及人与人之间的关系。必须通过强调人类协调行动的能力如何可能在动物世界中产生力量效应来纠正这种想法。正常0 14 false false false IT X-NONE X-NONE/*样式定义*/表。MsoNormalTable本文试图引起人们对霍布斯关于人在动物世界中的地位的思考的相关性的关注。由于动物在表征理论中没有作用,在激情理论中也没有作用,因此得出的结论是,权力只涉及人与人之间的关系。必须通过强调人类协调行动的能力如何可能在动物世界中产生力量效应来纠正这种想法。正常0 14假假假IT X-NONE X-NONE
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信