In the shadow of the healing rainbow: belonging and identity in the regulation of traditional medicine in Mauritius.

IF 1.3 Q1 LAW
Griffith Law Review Pub Date : 2023-08-26 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1080/10383441.2023.2249708
Nayeli Urquiza-Haas, Emilie Cloatre
{"title":"In the shadow of the healing rainbow: belonging and identity in the regulation of traditional medicine in Mauritius.","authors":"Nayeli Urquiza-Haas, Emilie Cloatre","doi":"10.1080/10383441.2023.2249708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article explores how traditional healing is regulated in the island of Mauritius. Drawing on postcolonial Science and Technology Studies and their encounter with socio-legal studies, it maps the emergence of the <i>Ayurveda and Other Traditional Medicines Act of 1990</i>, pointing out the selectivity of the notion of 'tradition' and its entanglement to broader nation-making processes, born in the process of its independence from Britain. While the social and political histories embedded in the text of the law favour the authorisation of some healing traditions and not others, outside its scope, other practices persist, and triggering competing visions about the island's healing futures. By bringing into the frame the plurality of Mauritius's healing landscape, where different traditions coexist despite their ambiguous legal status, this article accounts for the tensions in the regulation of traditional medicine, where the law produces its own inclusions and exclusions, and mundane legalities of everyday healing become sites of broader political questioning about the relationship between law, science, and nation-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":45376,"journal":{"name":"Griffith Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10540354/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Griffith Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2023.2249708","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores how traditional healing is regulated in the island of Mauritius. Drawing on postcolonial Science and Technology Studies and their encounter with socio-legal studies, it maps the emergence of the Ayurveda and Other Traditional Medicines Act of 1990, pointing out the selectivity of the notion of 'tradition' and its entanglement to broader nation-making processes, born in the process of its independence from Britain. While the social and political histories embedded in the text of the law favour the authorisation of some healing traditions and not others, outside its scope, other practices persist, and triggering competing visions about the island's healing futures. By bringing into the frame the plurality of Mauritius's healing landscape, where different traditions coexist despite their ambiguous legal status, this article accounts for the tensions in the regulation of traditional medicine, where the law produces its own inclusions and exclusions, and mundane legalities of everyday healing become sites of broader political questioning about the relationship between law, science, and nation-making.

在治愈彩虹的阴影下:毛里求斯传统医学监管中的归属和身份
摘要本文探讨了毛里求斯岛传统疗法的监管方式。根据后殖民时代的科学和技术研究以及他们与社会法律研究的相遇,它描绘了1990年《阿育吠陀和其他传统药物法》的出现,指出了“传统”概念的选择性及其与更广泛的建国进程的纠缠,这是在其脱离英国独立的过程中产生的。虽然法律文本中的社会和政治历史有利于授权一些治疗传统,而不是其他传统,但在其范围之外,其他做法仍然存在,并引发了对该岛治疗未来的相互竞争的愿景。本文通过将毛里求斯的多种治疗景观纳入框架,不同的传统共存,尽管它们的法律地位不明确,说明了传统医学监管的紧张关系,法律产生了自己的包容和排斥,日常治疗的世俗合法性成为对法律、科学和国家建设之间关系进行更广泛政治质疑的场所。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信