Educational dominant of the information economy development: a case of Latvia for Ukraine

IF 0.6 Q2 Social Sciences
A. Djakona, N. Kholiavko, M. Dubyna, A. Zhavoronok, M. Fedyshyn
{"title":"Educational dominant of the information economy development: a case of Latvia for Ukraine","authors":"A. Djakona, N. Kholiavko, M. Dubyna, A. Zhavoronok, M. Fedyshyn","doi":"10.21003/ea.v192-09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. In recent years, digitalization is one of the defining trends of the development in the leading countries of the world. The development of information economy is influenced by a combination of factors; however, the most powerful is an educational dominant. The higher education institutions (HEIs) carry out training activities for information economy, the development of digital skills of the personnel, as well as carrying out studies of the personnel’s digital skills, and conducting research, generating innovations and their transfer to the real sector of economy. The purpose of the paper is to analyze the impact of higher education on the dynamics of information economy on the example of Latvia with further identification of the best practices and their adaptation to the Ukrainian social and economic conditions. The research methodology is conditioned by the implementation of the in-depth comparative analysis of the development of higher education systems in Latvia and Ukraine; within the study, were used the method of constructing cubic regression models of the relationship between indicators. The hypothesis: 1) there is an objective interaction between the level of economic development of the country and the amount of public funding for higher education; 2) the information economy development is largely determined by the level of higher education development, and funding for research at HEIs. Results. The study revealed the following constraints on the development of the national higher education system: complex geopolitical, demographic, migration situation, which affects the parameters of the student body of HEIs; low competitiveness level of HEIs in the global educational services market; low level of financial autonomy of HEIs; lack of financing, low level of diversification of the financing sources for HEIs, etc. These problems negatively affect the pace of the information economy development in Ukraine. The authors proved that the Latvian experience in the implementation of the digitalization strategy could be useful for Ukraine, because of some similar economic, social, mental, historic conditions and factors of development of both countries. The calculations on the econometric models of relationship between funding and basic indicators of higher education development in Ukraine and Latvia showed: the amount of funding for higher education systems does not depend on the number of HEIs; the number of students depends on the amount of public funding (this indicates the important role of the state in the higher education development, in increasing the level of accessibility of higher education for citizens); close relationship between the amount of funding for higher education and the number of graduate students; positive trend in funding for higher education. Conclusions. The authors conclude that strengthening the impact of the educational dominant on the information economy development requires: ensuring a proactive position of HEIs (by modernizing their educational, research and innovation activities); activating the role of the government sector in protection of intellectual property, stimulating the development of innovatively active enterprises and their cooperation with universities, involving investments in the development of the HEIs’ innovative infrastructure, commercialization of innovative results of the research in the real sector of the economy.","PeriodicalId":51923,"journal":{"name":"Economic Annals-XXI","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Annals-XXI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.v192-09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Introduction. In recent years, digitalization is one of the defining trends of the development in the leading countries of the world. The development of information economy is influenced by a combination of factors; however, the most powerful is an educational dominant. The higher education institutions (HEIs) carry out training activities for information economy, the development of digital skills of the personnel, as well as carrying out studies of the personnel’s digital skills, and conducting research, generating innovations and their transfer to the real sector of economy. The purpose of the paper is to analyze the impact of higher education on the dynamics of information economy on the example of Latvia with further identification of the best practices and their adaptation to the Ukrainian social and economic conditions. The research methodology is conditioned by the implementation of the in-depth comparative analysis of the development of higher education systems in Latvia and Ukraine; within the study, were used the method of constructing cubic regression models of the relationship between indicators. The hypothesis: 1) there is an objective interaction between the level of economic development of the country and the amount of public funding for higher education; 2) the information economy development is largely determined by the level of higher education development, and funding for research at HEIs. Results. The study revealed the following constraints on the development of the national higher education system: complex geopolitical, demographic, migration situation, which affects the parameters of the student body of HEIs; low competitiveness level of HEIs in the global educational services market; low level of financial autonomy of HEIs; lack of financing, low level of diversification of the financing sources for HEIs, etc. These problems negatively affect the pace of the information economy development in Ukraine. The authors proved that the Latvian experience in the implementation of the digitalization strategy could be useful for Ukraine, because of some similar economic, social, mental, historic conditions and factors of development of both countries. The calculations on the econometric models of relationship between funding and basic indicators of higher education development in Ukraine and Latvia showed: the amount of funding for higher education systems does not depend on the number of HEIs; the number of students depends on the amount of public funding (this indicates the important role of the state in the higher education development, in increasing the level of accessibility of higher education for citizens); close relationship between the amount of funding for higher education and the number of graduate students; positive trend in funding for higher education. Conclusions. The authors conclude that strengthening the impact of the educational dominant on the information economy development requires: ensuring a proactive position of HEIs (by modernizing their educational, research and innovation activities); activating the role of the government sector in protection of intellectual property, stimulating the development of innovatively active enterprises and their cooperation with universities, involving investments in the development of the HEIs’ innovative infrastructure, commercialization of innovative results of the research in the real sector of the economy.
教育对信息经济发展的主导作用:以拉脱维亚为例
介绍。近年来,数字化是世界主要国家发展的决定性趋势之一。信息经济的发展受到多种因素的综合影响;然而,最强大的是教育主导。高等教育机构开展信息经济培训活动,培养人员的数字技能,开展人员数字技能研究,开展研究、创新并将其转化为实体经济。本文的目的是分析高等教育对信息经济动态的影响,以拉脱维亚为例,进一步确定最佳做法及其对乌克兰社会和经济条件的适应。研究方法以拉脱维亚和乌克兰高等教育系统发展的深入比较分析的实施为条件;在研究中,我们采用了构建三次回归模型的方法来分析各指标之间的关系。假设:1)国家的经济发展水平与高等教育公共经费之间存在客观的相互作用;2)信息经济的发展在很大程度上取决于高等教育的发展水平和高等学校的研究经费。结果。研究发现,制约我国高等教育体系发展的因素主要有:复杂的地缘政治、人口、移民形势影响了高等学校生源参数;高等学校在全球教育服务市场的竞争力不强;高校财政自主程度低;缺乏资金,高等学校的资金来源不多样化等。这些问题影响了乌克兰信息经济发展的步伐。作者证明,拉脱维亚在实施数字化战略方面的经验可能对乌克兰有用,因为两国的经济、社会、精神、历史条件和发展因素相似。对乌克兰和拉脱维亚高等教育发展基本指标与资金关系的计量经济模型计算表明:高等教育系统的资金数额不取决于高等教育机构的数量;学生的数量取决于公共资金的数量(这表明国家在高等教育发展中的重要作用,在提高公民接受高等教育的机会水平方面);高等教育经费数额与研究生人数密切相关;高等教育拨款呈积极趋势。结论。加强教育主导权对信息经济发展的影响需要:确保高等学校的主动地位(通过教育、研究和创新活动的现代化);激活政府部门在保护知识产权方面的作用,刺激创新活跃企业的发展及其与大学的合作,包括投资发展高等教育机构的创新基础设施,将创新研究成果在实体经济领域商业化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Economic Annals-XXI
Economic Annals-XXI ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Economic Annals-XXI Journal – recognized in Ukraine and abroad scientific-analytic edition. Scientific articles of leading Ukrainian and other foreign scientists, postgraduate students and doctorates, deputies of Ukraine, heads of state and local authorities, materials of scientific conferences and seminars; reviews on scientific monographs, etc. are regularly published in this Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信