Determinants of Capital Structure: Evidence from the UK

Sarah ALmuaither, M. Marzouk
{"title":"Determinants of Capital Structure: Evidence from the UK","authors":"Sarah ALmuaither, M. Marzouk","doi":"10.17265/1548-6583/2019.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the determinants of capital structure of UK firms by using the ordinary least squares (OLS)\nestimation with six independent variables including company size, profitability, tangibility, growth opportunities,\ntax, and volatility, as well as four industry classification dummy variables and with financial leverage as the\ndependent variable. The data set for the research includes all FTSE 100 companies in 2016. The findings reveal (i)\na positive but insignificant relationship between company size and leverage; (ii) a negative but insignificant\nassociation between profitability and leverage; (iii) level of tangible assets and leverage are negatively related but\nsuch negative relationship is not significant; (iv) growth opportunities and leverage are negatively correlated and\nthe negative relationship is highly statistically significant; (v) tax and leverage are positively related but the\nrelationship is not statistically significant; and (vi) volatility and leverage are negatively related but the relationship\nis not statistically significant. The significant negative relationship between industry dummies and leverage is\nrelated to companies in the mining industry that did not use much debt to finance their business compared to those\nin other industries. Among five different capital structures, the pecking order theory indicates that companies prefer\nemploying internal fund such as retained earnings or excess liquid assets to external finance investment\nopportunities, which seems to be suitable for UK companies. Static trade off theory which addresses the existence\nof optimal capital structures of firms affected by the trade-off between costs and benefits when using debt and\nequity is only applicable in particular cases in the UK. Dynamic trade off theory that argues that the appropriate\nfinancing choice typically relies on the financing margin that is estimated in the coming period, and market timing\ntheory which demonstrates that stock price fluctuations in the market influence companies’ capital structure, are not\nsupported by the findings of this study.","PeriodicalId":71220,"journal":{"name":"现代会计与审计:英文版","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"现代会计与审计:英文版","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17265/1548-6583/2019.06.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This study investigates the determinants of capital structure of UK firms by using the ordinary least squares (OLS) estimation with six independent variables including company size, profitability, tangibility, growth opportunities, tax, and volatility, as well as four industry classification dummy variables and with financial leverage as the dependent variable. The data set for the research includes all FTSE 100 companies in 2016. The findings reveal (i) a positive but insignificant relationship between company size and leverage; (ii) a negative but insignificant association between profitability and leverage; (iii) level of tangible assets and leverage are negatively related but such negative relationship is not significant; (iv) growth opportunities and leverage are negatively correlated and the negative relationship is highly statistically significant; (v) tax and leverage are positively related but the relationship is not statistically significant; and (vi) volatility and leverage are negatively related but the relationship is not statistically significant. The significant negative relationship between industry dummies and leverage is related to companies in the mining industry that did not use much debt to finance their business compared to those in other industries. Among five different capital structures, the pecking order theory indicates that companies prefer employing internal fund such as retained earnings or excess liquid assets to external finance investment opportunities, which seems to be suitable for UK companies. Static trade off theory which addresses the existence of optimal capital structures of firms affected by the trade-off between costs and benefits when using debt and equity is only applicable in particular cases in the UK. Dynamic trade off theory that argues that the appropriate financing choice typically relies on the financing margin that is estimated in the coming period, and market timing theory which demonstrates that stock price fluctuations in the market influence companies’ capital structure, are not supported by the findings of this study.
资本结构的决定因素:来自英国的证据
本研究采用普通最小二乘法(OLS)估计了英国企业资本结构的决定因素,该估计包含六个自变量,包括公司规模、盈利能力、有形性、增长机会、税收和波动性,以及四个行业分类伪变量,并以财务杠杆率为自变量。该研究的数据集包括2016年所有富时100指数成分股公司。研究结果表明:(i)公司规模与杠杆率之间存在正相关但不显著的关系;(ii)盈利能力与杠杆之间的负相关但不显著;(iii)有形资产水平和杠杆率呈负相关,但这种负关系并不显著;(iv)增长机会和杠杆率呈负相关,负相关具有高度统计学意义;(v) 税收和杠杆率呈正相关,但两者之间的关系在统计学上并不显著;(vi)波动率和杠杆率呈负相关,但这种关系在统计上并不显著。行业假人和杠杆之间的显著负相关关系与采矿业的公司有关,与其他行业相比,这些公司没有使用太多债务来为其业务融资。在五种不同的资本结构中,优序理论表明,公司更倾向于利用留存收益或超额流动资产等内部资金,而不是外部融资投资机会,这似乎适合英国公司。静态权衡理论解决了在使用债务和公平时受成本和收益权衡影响的企业最优资本结构的存在问题,该理论仅适用于英国的特定情况。动态权衡理论认为,适当的融资选择通常取决于未来一段时间内估计的融资边际,以及市场时间理论表明股票价格波动会影响公司的资本结构,但这一理论并没有得到本研究结果的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
930
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信