VAT Deduction: The Relevance of Being ‘The Recipient’ of a Supply and the Use of the Supply

Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI:10.54648/ecta2020049
Jeroen Bijl
{"title":"VAT Deduction: The Relevance of Being ‘The Recipient’ of a Supply and the Use of the Supply","authors":"Jeroen Bijl","doi":"10.54648/ecta2020049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, the author scrutinizes the current state of CJEU case law about VAT deduction on the purchase of goods and services by businesses, where third parties (also) benefit from these purchases. He also discusses case law about the VAT consequences of business funding transactions between two unrelated parties, where they have a financial interest in funding those transactions because they can lead to, for example, an increase of the turnover generated with their own taxed activities. The author comes to the conclusion that under the current provisions of the EU VAT Directive and CJEU case law, VAT deduction is not always allowed where, based on the principles of neutrality and economic reality, it should. He also offers a suggestion for adjusting the current rules in order to solve the issues that were highlighted in this article.\nEU VAT, Deduction, Benefit, Third-party-payments, Economic activities, Neutrality, Business promotions, Necessary costs","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/ecta2020049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, the author scrutinizes the current state of CJEU case law about VAT deduction on the purchase of goods and services by businesses, where third parties (also) benefit from these purchases. He also discusses case law about the VAT consequences of business funding transactions between two unrelated parties, where they have a financial interest in funding those transactions because they can lead to, for example, an increase of the turnover generated with their own taxed activities. The author comes to the conclusion that under the current provisions of the EU VAT Directive and CJEU case law, VAT deduction is not always allowed where, based on the principles of neutrality and economic reality, it should. He also offers a suggestion for adjusting the current rules in order to solve the issues that were highlighted in this article. EU VAT, Deduction, Benefit, Third-party-payments, Economic activities, Neutrality, Business promotions, Necessary costs
分享
查看原文
增值税扣减:作为供应的“接受者”与供应的使用的相关性
在本文中,作者仔细审查了欧盟判例法关于企业购买商品和服务的增值税扣除的现状,其中第三方也从中受益。他还讨论了有关两个不相关方之间的商业融资交易的增值税后果的判例法,在这些交易中,他们在为这些交易提供资金方面有经济利益,因为它们可能导致,例如,增加他们自己的纳税活动产生的营业额。笔者的结论是,在欧盟增值税指令和欧盟判例法的现行规定下,基于中立原则和经济现实,增值税抵扣并不总是允许的。他还提出了调整现行规则的建议,以解决本文强调的问题。欧盟增值税,扣除,利益,第三方支付,经济活动,中立,商业推广,必要成本
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信