Differences in Fibroid Symptom Reporting among Asian and Caucasian Patients in a Multidisciplinary Fibroid Center

N. Jimenez Ramirez, Zainub Dhanani, Jennifer Nguyen, Janine S. Bruce, D. Lum, D. Atashroo, P. Ghanouni, Bertha Chen
{"title":"Differences in Fibroid Symptom Reporting among Asian and Caucasian Patients in a Multidisciplinary Fibroid Center","authors":"N. Jimenez Ramirez, Zainub Dhanani, Jennifer Nguyen, Janine S. Bruce, D. Lum, D. Atashroo, P. Ghanouni, Bertha Chen","doi":"10.59448/jah.v3i1.37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Uterine fibroids are prevalent in reproductive-age Asian women and can have a severe impact on health due to heavy bleeding, pelvic pain, and psychosocial harm. Current treatment, ranging from expectant management to hysterectomy, is aimed at symptom alleviation. Therefore, it is crucial for providers to accurately gauge symptom impact to determine appropriate treatments. A recent study reported differential symptom scores between Asian and Caucasian women treated at the Stanford Fibroid Center (SFC).1 In this pilot study, we aim to explore potential etiologies contributing to this finding by comparing fibroid size and location, clinical factors, and surveying sociocultural factors. \nMethods: We utilized a mixed methods approach to uncover potential associations to differential Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Health-Related Quality of Life Symptom Severity Scores (UFS-QoL SSS) between Asian and Caucasian patients at SFC. We quantitatively analyzed fibroid imaging data and clinical risk factors from this cohort and qualitatively compared semi-structured interviews in a representative sub-sample. \nResults: We found no significant difference in fibroid size or location between groups. However, Asians had significantly lower body mass index (P < 0.0001) and were more likely non-smokers (P = 0.0037) compared to Caucasians. After adjusting for these and other risk factors, pretreatment UFS-QoL SSS in Asian patients were still significantly lower (P < 0.0001). Qualitative interviews with Asian and Caucasian interviewees demonstrated comparable symptom experiences and quality of life, but more Asian participants described a negative impact from family and friends, less access to and distrust of medical providers, and pursuit of alternative therapies for their fibroids. \nConclusion: These findings suggest that the UFS-QoL questionnaire may be insufficient for capturing symptom burden in patients of different races. Further understanding on how the above factors modulate symptom reporting is warranted to help design appropriate fibroid treatment recommendations for diverse populations. ","PeriodicalId":73612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asian health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asian health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59448/jah.v3i1.37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Uterine fibroids are prevalent in reproductive-age Asian women and can have a severe impact on health due to heavy bleeding, pelvic pain, and psychosocial harm. Current treatment, ranging from expectant management to hysterectomy, is aimed at symptom alleviation. Therefore, it is crucial for providers to accurately gauge symptom impact to determine appropriate treatments. A recent study reported differential symptom scores between Asian and Caucasian women treated at the Stanford Fibroid Center (SFC).1 In this pilot study, we aim to explore potential etiologies contributing to this finding by comparing fibroid size and location, clinical factors, and surveying sociocultural factors.  Methods: We utilized a mixed methods approach to uncover potential associations to differential Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Health-Related Quality of Life Symptom Severity Scores (UFS-QoL SSS) between Asian and Caucasian patients at SFC. We quantitatively analyzed fibroid imaging data and clinical risk factors from this cohort and qualitatively compared semi-structured interviews in a representative sub-sample.  Results: We found no significant difference in fibroid size or location between groups. However, Asians had significantly lower body mass index (P < 0.0001) and were more likely non-smokers (P = 0.0037) compared to Caucasians. After adjusting for these and other risk factors, pretreatment UFS-QoL SSS in Asian patients were still significantly lower (P < 0.0001). Qualitative interviews with Asian and Caucasian interviewees demonstrated comparable symptom experiences and quality of life, but more Asian participants described a negative impact from family and friends, less access to and distrust of medical providers, and pursuit of alternative therapies for their fibroids.  Conclusion: These findings suggest that the UFS-QoL questionnaire may be insufficient for capturing symptom burden in patients of different races. Further understanding on how the above factors modulate symptom reporting is warranted to help design appropriate fibroid treatment recommendations for diverse populations. 
在一个多学科的肌瘤中心,亚洲和高加索患者肌瘤症状报告的差异
引言:子宫肌瘤在育龄亚洲女性中普遍存在,由于大出血、盆腔疼痛和心理社会伤害,子宫肌瘤会对健康产生严重影响。目前的治疗,从期待治疗到子宫切除术,都是为了缓解症状。因此,提供者准确评估症状影响以确定适当的治疗方法至关重要。最近的一项研究报告了在斯坦福纤维瘤中心(SFC)接受治疗的亚裔和高加索女性之间的症状评分差异。1在这项试点研究中,我们旨在通过比较纤维瘤的大小和位置、临床因素和调查社会文化因素来探索导致这一发现的潜在病因。方法:我们采用混合方法来揭示SFC中亚洲和高加索患者之间子宫肌瘤症状和健康相关生活质量症状严重程度评分(UFS-QoL-SSS)差异的潜在关联。我们定量分析了该队列的纤维瘤成像数据和临床风险因素,并在代表性子样本中对半结构化访谈进行了定性比较。结果:我们发现两组之间的纤维瘤大小或位置没有显著差异。然而,与高加索人相比,亚洲人的体重指数明显较低(P<0.0001),更可能是非吸烟者(P=0.0037)。在调整了这些和其他风险因素后,亚洲患者在治疗前的UFS生活质量SSS仍然显著降低(P<0.0001)。对亚洲和高加索受访者的定性访谈显示,症状体验和生活质量相似,但更多的亚洲参与者描述了来自家人和朋友的负面影响,较少接触和不信任医疗服务提供者,以及寻求针对其纤维瘤的替代疗法。结论:这些发现表明,UFS生活质量问卷可能不足以捕捉不同种族患者的症状负担。进一步了解上述因素如何调节症状报告,有助于为不同人群设计合适的纤维瘤治疗建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信