Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on Health Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 0.8 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Lin Xie, Xiaomin Zhu, Miao Liu, Yang Liu
{"title":"Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on Health Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Lin Xie, Xiaomin Zhu, Miao Liu, Yang Liu","doi":"10.24193/jebp.2020.2.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"The incidence of psychological distress (such as anxiety and depression) is high in COPD patients. CBT has been proved to reduce depression and anxiety and enhance quality of life. This meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy(CBT) on patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD). The following electronic databases were searched from inception to March\n2020: PubMed, EMBase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Medline, OVID, CINAHL, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), China\nNational Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wangfang Database (WF), PsycARTICLES, VIP database. The Scopus and Google scholar database that we did not use. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared CBT with routine methods of care in COPD were retrieved in electronic databases. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and Review Manager version 5.3 were used for risk of bias assessment and meta-analysis, respectively. Both data synthesis and descriptive analysis were used for outcome assessment. A total of 10 RCTs involving 1173 patients were included. Data synthesis showed that CBT was statistically significant in improving short- and medium-term depression and treatment compliance. Mediumterm anxiety and quality of life were improved among COPD patients receiving CBT, although no significant effect was found for short-term quality of life and anxiety. Descriptive analysis showed that CBT could reduce dyspnea. No clear evidence supports the effectiveness on improving self-efficacy in COPD patients with the use of CBT (P > 0.05).\nCBT can be a useful strategy to improve the symptoms of depression, dyspnea and treatment compliance in patients with COPD. It can also improve patients’ quality of life and anxiety to some extent, but there is still lack of strong evidence in improving patients’ self-efficacy.\"","PeriodicalId":43042,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies","volume":"20 1","pages":"143-163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24193/jebp.2020.2.17","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

"The incidence of psychological distress (such as anxiety and depression) is high in COPD patients. CBT has been proved to reduce depression and anxiety and enhance quality of life. This meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy(CBT) on patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD). The following electronic databases were searched from inception to March 2020: PubMed, EMBase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Medline, OVID, CINAHL, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wangfang Database (WF), PsycARTICLES, VIP database. The Scopus and Google scholar database that we did not use. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared CBT with routine methods of care in COPD were retrieved in electronic databases. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and Review Manager version 5.3 were used for risk of bias assessment and meta-analysis, respectively. Both data synthesis and descriptive analysis were used for outcome assessment. A total of 10 RCTs involving 1173 patients were included. Data synthesis showed that CBT was statistically significant in improving short- and medium-term depression and treatment compliance. Mediumterm anxiety and quality of life were improved among COPD patients receiving CBT, although no significant effect was found for short-term quality of life and anxiety. Descriptive analysis showed that CBT could reduce dyspnea. No clear evidence supports the effectiveness on improving self-efficacy in COPD patients with the use of CBT (P > 0.05). CBT can be a useful strategy to improve the symptoms of depression, dyspnea and treatment compliance in patients with COPD. It can also improve patients’ quality of life and anxiety to some extent, but there is still lack of strong evidence in improving patients’ self-efficacy."
认知行为疗法对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者健康结局的影响:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
“慢性阻塞性肺病患者的心理困扰(如焦虑和抑郁)发生率很高。CBT已被证明可以减少抑郁和焦虑,提高生活质量。本荟萃分析评估了认知行为疗法(CBT)对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的有效性。从建库到2020年3月,检索了以下电子数据库:PubMed、EMBase、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、Medline、OVID、CINAHL、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、中国知网(CNKI)、望方数据库(WF)、PsycARTICLES、VIP数据库。我们没有使用的Scopus和谷歌学者数据库。在电子数据库中检索了比较CBT与常规COPD治疗方法的随机对照试验(RCTs)。分别使用Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool和Review Manager version 5.3进行偏倚风险评估和meta分析。结果评估采用数据综合和描述性分析两种方法。共纳入10项rct,涉及1173例患者。数据综合显示CBT在改善中短期抑郁和治疗依从性方面具有统计学意义。接受CBT治疗的COPD患者的中期焦虑和生活质量得到改善,但对短期生活质量和焦虑没有显著影响。描述性分析显示CBT可减轻呼吸困难。没有明确的证据支持CBT对改善COPD患者自我效能的有效性(P < 0.05)。CBT可以是改善COPD患者抑郁、呼吸困难症状和治疗依从性的有效策略。它也可以在一定程度上改善患者的生活质量和焦虑,但在提高患者自我效能方面仍缺乏强有力的证据。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The journal is devoted to the advancement of the clinical theory and practice of evidence-based psychotherapies (EBP) (e.g., evidence-based psychological assessments, evidence-based psychological treatments). The journal publishes original papers dealing with EBP and psychology, psychiatry, the medical and mental specialties, and allied areas of science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信