Discriminating between high- and low-quality field depletion experiments through simulation analysis

IF 0.8 4区 农林科学 Q3 FISHERIES
Leanne M. Poussard, E. Powell, D. Hennen
{"title":"Discriminating between high- and low-quality field depletion experiments through simulation analysis","authors":"Leanne M. Poussard, E. Powell, D. Hennen","doi":"10.7755/fb.119.4.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"— Between 1997 and 2011, the National Marine Fisheries Service conducted 50 depletion experiments to examine efficiency of survey gear for capturing clam species and to estimate stock density for populations of Atlantic surfclams ( Spisula solidissima ) and ocean quahogs ( Arctica islandica ) by using commercial hydraulic dredges. The Patch model was formulated to estimate gear efficiency and organism density from the depletion experiment data. The range of efficiencies estimated is substantial, leading to uncertainty in the application of these estimates in stock assessment. Known values of 4 measures of experimental performance for each of the 50 depletion experiments conducted in the field were compared with values of those same characteristics from 9000 simulated depletion experiments, values that were assumed to represent a suite of conditions that might also occur in the corresponding field experiment. These comparisons allow analyses of the quality of field experiments that would otherwise not be possible and provide evidence for weighting the results of field experiments beyond traditional measures of uncertainty. The characteristics of performance were used to identify a subset of field experiments that were more likely to have produced inaccurate estimates of gear efficiency, potentially introducing bias and, as a result, lower-ing the efficiency estimates in the entire depletion data set. analyzing shellfish","PeriodicalId":50442,"journal":{"name":"Fishery Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fishery Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7755/fb.119.4.7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

— Between 1997 and 2011, the National Marine Fisheries Service conducted 50 depletion experiments to examine efficiency of survey gear for capturing clam species and to estimate stock density for populations of Atlantic surfclams ( Spisula solidissima ) and ocean quahogs ( Arctica islandica ) by using commercial hydraulic dredges. The Patch model was formulated to estimate gear efficiency and organism density from the depletion experiment data. The range of efficiencies estimated is substantial, leading to uncertainty in the application of these estimates in stock assessment. Known values of 4 measures of experimental performance for each of the 50 depletion experiments conducted in the field were compared with values of those same characteristics from 9000 simulated depletion experiments, values that were assumed to represent a suite of conditions that might also occur in the corresponding field experiment. These comparisons allow analyses of the quality of field experiments that would otherwise not be possible and provide evidence for weighting the results of field experiments beyond traditional measures of uncertainty. The characteristics of performance were used to identify a subset of field experiments that were more likely to have produced inaccurate estimates of gear efficiency, potentially introducing bias and, as a result, lower-ing the efficiency estimates in the entire depletion data set. analyzing shellfish
通过模拟分析区分高质量和低质量场耗尽实验
--1997年至2011年间,国家海洋渔业局进行了50次损耗实验,以检查捕获蛤蜊物种的调查设备的效率,并通过使用商业水力挖泥船估计大西洋冲浪蛤蜊(Spisula solidissima)和海洋鹌鹑(Arctica islandica)种群的种群密度。Patch模型是根据消耗实验数据来估计齿轮效率和生物体密度的。估计的效率范围很大,导致这些估计在库存评估中的应用存在不确定性。将现场进行的50次消耗实验中每一次的4种实验性能测量的已知值与9000次模拟消耗实验中相同特性的值进行比较,这些值被认为代表了相应现场实验中可能出现的一系列条件。这些比较允许对现场实验的质量进行分析,否则这是不可能的,并为在传统的不确定性测量之外对现场实验结果进行加权提供了证据。性能特征被用来确定一组现场实验,这些实验更有可能产生齿轮效率的不准确估计,可能会引入偏差,从而降低整个消耗数据集中的效率估计。贝类分析
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fishery Bulletin
Fishery Bulletin 农林科学-渔业
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
76
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: The quarterly Fishery Bulletin is one of the oldest and most respected fisheries journals in the world. It has been an official publication of the U.S. Government since 1881, under various titles, and is the U.S. counterpart to other highly regarded governmental fisheries science publications. It publishes original research and interpretative articles in all scientific fields that bear on marine fisheries and marine mammal science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信