Sensitivity analysis of the SMARTER and MOORA methods in decision making of achieving students

Intan Nur Farida, Umi Mahdiyah, Akbar Fastio Hari Setiawan
{"title":"Sensitivity analysis of the SMARTER and MOORA methods in decision making of achieving students","authors":"Intan Nur Farida, Umi Mahdiyah, Akbar Fastio Hari Setiawan","doi":"10.20895/infotel.v14i3.751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evaluation of student learning in Islamic boarding schools is still limited to the results of exams conducted in writing which can lead to the determination of student achievement using simple criteria, resulting in less than optimal results. In addition, the importance of selecting criteria to suit the learning characteristics of the Islamic boarding school students. The purpose of this study is to assist the process of evaluating student learning based on the value of the criteria, sub-criteria, and priorities. The method used is Rank Order Centroid in assigning weight values ​​to the criteria applied to the Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique Exploiting Ranks (SMARTER) and Multi-Objective Optimization By Ratio Analysis (MOORA) methods. This study produces the same alternative value in the first rank. To calculate the accuracy is done by using sensitivity analysis according to the results of preference values ​​in each method. Based on the sensitivity analysis shows that in the first sensitivity calculation the lowest value is obtained. The sensitivity value of the SMARTER method on the first sensitivity is 0.0714. While the first sensitivity value of the MOORA method is 0.0076. So the best method is owned by the MOORA method because it has the lowest sensitivity value.","PeriodicalId":30672,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Infotel","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Infotel","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20895/infotel.v14i3.751","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evaluation of student learning in Islamic boarding schools is still limited to the results of exams conducted in writing which can lead to the determination of student achievement using simple criteria, resulting in less than optimal results. In addition, the importance of selecting criteria to suit the learning characteristics of the Islamic boarding school students. The purpose of this study is to assist the process of evaluating student learning based on the value of the criteria, sub-criteria, and priorities. The method used is Rank Order Centroid in assigning weight values ​​to the criteria applied to the Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique Exploiting Ranks (SMARTER) and Multi-Objective Optimization By Ratio Analysis (MOORA) methods. This study produces the same alternative value in the first rank. To calculate the accuracy is done by using sensitivity analysis according to the results of preference values ​​in each method. Based on the sensitivity analysis shows that in the first sensitivity calculation the lowest value is obtained. The sensitivity value of the SMARTER method on the first sensitivity is 0.0714. While the first sensitivity value of the MOORA method is 0.0076. So the best method is owned by the MOORA method because it has the lowest sensitivity value.
smart和MOORA方法在优生决策中的敏感性分析
伊斯兰寄宿学校对学生学习的评估仍然局限于书面考试的结果,这可能导致使用简单的标准来确定学生的成绩,从而导致不太理想的结果。此外,选择适合伊斯兰寄宿学校学生学习特点的标准的重要性。本研究的目的是根据标准、子标准和优先级的价值来帮助评估学生学习的过程。在分配权重值时使用的方法是秩序质心​​适用于简单多属性评级技术开发等级(SMARTER)和比率分析多目标优化(MOORA)方法的标准。这项研究在第一等级中产生了相同的替代值。根据偏好值的结果,使用灵敏度分析来计算精度​​在每种方法中。基于灵敏度分析表明,在第一次灵敏度计算中获得了最低值。SMARTER方法对第一灵敏度的灵敏度值为0.0714。而MOORA方法的第一灵敏度值为0.0076。因此,最好的方法属于MOORA方法,因为它具有最低的灵敏度值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信