Lack of refuge as a bottleneck for reptiles in intensive woody crops

IF 1 4区 生物学 Q3 ZOOLOGY
Marta Canós-Burguete, Mizar Torrijo-Salesa, F. S. Tortosa, J. Guerrero-Casado
{"title":"Lack of refuge as a bottleneck for reptiles in intensive woody crops","authors":"Marta Canós-Burguete, Mizar Torrijo-Salesa, F. S. Tortosa, J. Guerrero-Casado","doi":"10.1163/15685381-bja10132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The lack of refuge has been suggested as one of the main factors affecting reptiles in intensive crops, but this theory has not been explored to any great extent. The aim of this work is to compare the reptile abundance and species richness between traditional and intensive vineyards and olive groves, and to test the acceptance of artificial shelter due to its scarcity in the new intensive woody crop. A total of 288 transects were carried out (144 in olive groves and 144 in vineyards) in six different types of plots: traditional olive groves, traditional vineyards, intensive olive groves with and without artificial refuge, and trellis vineyards with and without artificial refuge. The results showed a greater species richness and abundance of reptiles in the traditional plots than in the intensive plots (independently of the experimental refuges added). An important number of animals were observed using the artificial refuges in olive groves. Furthermore, most of the individuals were located on or escaped to old trees in traditional systems, including an important proportion of reptiles hidden in olive trunk cavities, whereas more individuals were observed on the ground in intensive systems. Our finding suggests the importance for reptile communities of the traditional agricultural systems due to the high availability of the refuge provided by old olive tree trunks and free-standing gobelet vineyards. Our results show that providing refuge may mitigate the negative effects of woody crops intensification on reptile communities.","PeriodicalId":50799,"journal":{"name":"Amphibia-Reptilia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Amphibia-Reptilia","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15685381-bja10132","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The lack of refuge has been suggested as one of the main factors affecting reptiles in intensive crops, but this theory has not been explored to any great extent. The aim of this work is to compare the reptile abundance and species richness between traditional and intensive vineyards and olive groves, and to test the acceptance of artificial shelter due to its scarcity in the new intensive woody crop. A total of 288 transects were carried out (144 in olive groves and 144 in vineyards) in six different types of plots: traditional olive groves, traditional vineyards, intensive olive groves with and without artificial refuge, and trellis vineyards with and without artificial refuge. The results showed a greater species richness and abundance of reptiles in the traditional plots than in the intensive plots (independently of the experimental refuges added). An important number of animals were observed using the artificial refuges in olive groves. Furthermore, most of the individuals were located on or escaped to old trees in traditional systems, including an important proportion of reptiles hidden in olive trunk cavities, whereas more individuals were observed on the ground in intensive systems. Our finding suggests the importance for reptile communities of the traditional agricultural systems due to the high availability of the refuge provided by old olive tree trunks and free-standing gobelet vineyards. Our results show that providing refuge may mitigate the negative effects of woody crops intensification on reptile communities.
缺乏避难所是爬行动物在密集木本作物中生存的瓶颈
缺乏避难所被认为是影响集约化作物中爬行动物的主要因素之一,但这一理论尚未得到深入的探讨。这项工作的目的是比较传统和集约化葡萄园和橄榄园之间爬行动物的丰度和物种丰富度,并测试人工庇护所的接受程度,因为它在新的集约化木本作物中很稀缺。共对6个不同类型的地块进行了288个样例(144个在橄榄园,144个在葡萄园):传统橄榄园、传统葡萄园、集约型橄榄园(有和没有人工庇护)、网格式葡萄园(有和没有人工庇护)。结果表明,传统样地的爬行动物物种丰富度和丰度高于集约化样地(与添加的实验避难所无关)。观察到有相当数量的动物在橄榄林中使用人工避难所。此外,在传统系统中,大多数爬行动物位于老树上或逃到老树上,其中有相当一部分爬行动物隐藏在橄榄树树干腔中,而在集约化系统中,更多的个体在地面上观察到。我们的发现表明,由于古老的橄榄树树干和独立的gobelet葡萄园提供了高可用性的避难所,传统农业系统对爬行动物群落的重要性。研究结果表明,提供庇护可以减轻木本作物集约化对爬行动物群落的负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Amphibia-Reptilia
Amphibia-Reptilia 生物-动物学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
39
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Amphibia-Reptilia is a leading European multi-disciplinary journal devoted to most of the aspects of herpetology: ecology, behaviour, evolution, conservation, physiology, morphology, paleontology, genetics, and systematics. Amphibia-Reptilia publishes high quality original papers, short-notes, reviews, book reviews and news of the Societas Europaea Herpetologica (SEH). The Societas Europaea Herpteologica (SEH) website is located at: www.seh-herpetology.org.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信