The Legal Judgment: A Novel Twist on the Classic Law School Problem Question

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Patrick R. Goold
{"title":"The Legal Judgment: A Novel Twist on the Classic Law School Problem Question","authors":"Patrick R. Goold","doi":"10.1080/03069400.2021.2000232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In recent years, educators have sought to diversify the types of assessment used in the legal curriculum. This article introduces a novel form of assessment: the legal judgment. Much like a classic “problem question”, a “legal judgment” presents students with a factual scenario to analyse. However, rather than ask students to provide legal advice, the legal judgment asks students to decide the case by issuing a written judgment. This article showcases this form of assessment while exploring its advantages and challenges. The article argues that this novel twist on the classic law school problem question helps students to develop higher-order legal reasoning abilities, is more intellectually inspiring than the classic problem question, and encourages students to truly “think like lawyers”.","PeriodicalId":44936,"journal":{"name":"Law Teacher","volume":"56 1","pages":"368 - 383"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2021.2000232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT In recent years, educators have sought to diversify the types of assessment used in the legal curriculum. This article introduces a novel form of assessment: the legal judgment. Much like a classic “problem question”, a “legal judgment” presents students with a factual scenario to analyse. However, rather than ask students to provide legal advice, the legal judgment asks students to decide the case by issuing a written judgment. This article showcases this form of assessment while exploring its advantages and challenges. The article argues that this novel twist on the classic law school problem question helps students to develop higher-order legal reasoning abilities, is more intellectually inspiring than the classic problem question, and encourages students to truly “think like lawyers”.
法律裁判:对经典法学院问题的一种新颖的扭曲
摘要近年来,教育工作者试图使法律课程中使用的评估类型多样化。本文介绍了一种新颖的评估形式:法律判决。就像经典的“问题题”一样,“法律判决”为学生提供了一个需要分析的事实场景。然而,法律判决书并没有要求学生提供法律咨询,而是要求学生通过发布书面判决书来决定案件。本文展示了这种评估形式,同时探讨了它的优势和挑战。文章认为,这种对法学院经典问题的新颖扭曲有助于学生培养更高层次的法律推理能力,比经典问题更具智力启发性,并鼓励学生真正“像律师一样思考”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Law Teacher
Law Teacher EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信