The Use of Cohesive Devices in Descriptive Text by English Training Participants at PST”

Kifti Halimah Islami, Mursid Saleh, Dwi Anggani Linggar Bharati
{"title":"The Use of Cohesive Devices in Descriptive Text by English Training Participants at PST”","authors":"Kifti Halimah Islami, Mursid Saleh, Dwi Anggani Linggar Bharati","doi":"10.15294/eej.v12i1.49052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Today, many media to large companies are starting to invest English skills in their employees, including Pura Smart Technology (PST). This research aims to find out the use of cohesive lexical devices, the use of cohesive grammatical devices, the correctness of cohesive device uses, and the correlation of cohesive device use and descriptive text writing skills of the participants. The researcher took eleven employees as the participants. The researcher analyzed the data with Halliday & Hasan's theory, Coh-Metrix 3.0, and Spearman Correlation. The results were repetition with 54.92%, synonym with 6.81%, hyponym with 33.71%, meronym with 3.40%, and collocation with 1.14%. In terms of grammatical cohesion, the researcher found a reference with 29.54% and conjunction with 69.31%. The result also showed that the participants' cohesive device use excellence was 39.65%, with a very strong correlation, (rs) = 0.95. The researchers found that the English training participants had low mastery of cohesive device use quality. The researchers also found that the participants' cohesive devices and writing skills had a strong, significant, and immense correlation. The researchers suggest that future researchers upgrade the study's object and involve participants from different and complex backgrounds. From the pedagogical perspective, cohesive device uses are important to create a good image and judge an excellent educational background between the writer and the reader while understanding the meaning. Thus, writers can produce texts without any hoax information nowadays. Practically, these results help people use text appropriately in formal and non-formal settings.","PeriodicalId":30982,"journal":{"name":"English Education Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/eej.v12i1.49052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Today, many media to large companies are starting to invest English skills in their employees, including Pura Smart Technology (PST). This research aims to find out the use of cohesive lexical devices, the use of cohesive grammatical devices, the correctness of cohesive device uses, and the correlation of cohesive device use and descriptive text writing skills of the participants. The researcher took eleven employees as the participants. The researcher analyzed the data with Halliday & Hasan's theory, Coh-Metrix 3.0, and Spearman Correlation. The results were repetition with 54.92%, synonym with 6.81%, hyponym with 33.71%, meronym with 3.40%, and collocation with 1.14%. In terms of grammatical cohesion, the researcher found a reference with 29.54% and conjunction with 69.31%. The result also showed that the participants' cohesive device use excellence was 39.65%, with a very strong correlation, (rs) = 0.95. The researchers found that the English training participants had low mastery of cohesive device use quality. The researchers also found that the participants' cohesive devices and writing skills had a strong, significant, and immense correlation. The researchers suggest that future researchers upgrade the study's object and involve participants from different and complex backgrounds. From the pedagogical perspective, cohesive device uses are important to create a good image and judge an excellent educational background between the writer and the reader while understanding the meaning. Thus, writers can produce texts without any hoax information nowadays. Practically, these results help people use text appropriately in formal and non-formal settings.
PST英语培训参与者在描述性文本中使用衔接手段
如今,许多媒体和大公司都开始在员工身上投资英语技能,包括Pura Smart Technology(PST)。本研究旨在了解参与者的衔接词汇手段的使用、衔接语法手段的使用,衔接手段使用的正确性,以及衔接手段使用与描述性文本写作技能的相关性。研究人员以11名员工为参与者。研究人员使用Halliday&Hasan的理论、Coh-Metrix 3.0和Spearman相关性对数据进行了分析。结果显示,重复率为54.92%,同义词为6.81%,次名为33.71%,亚名为3.40%,搭配率为1.14%。在语法衔接方面,研究人员发现参考语为29.54%,连词为69.31%。结果还表明,参与者的衔接手段使用优度为39.65%,具有很强的相关性,(rs)=0.95。研究人员发现,英语培训参与者对衔接设备使用质量的掌握程度较低。研究人员还发现,参与者的凝聚力和写作技能有着强烈、显著和巨大的相关性。研究人员建议,未来的研究人员升级研究对象,让来自不同复杂背景的参与者参与进来。从教学学的角度来看,衔接手段的使用对于在理解意义的同时,在作者和读者之间创造良好的形象和判断优秀的教育背景非常重要。因此,如今作家可以在没有任何恶作剧信息的情况下创作文本。实际上,这些结果有助于人们在正式和非正式环境中适当地使用文本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信