Home in Three Dimensions: Personal Location in Comparative and Transreligious Theologies

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION
S. M. Heim
{"title":"Home in Three Dimensions: Personal Location in Comparative and Transreligious Theologies","authors":"S. M. Heim","doi":"10.3138/tjt-2023-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article reflects on my experience of what it means to have a \"home\" as a comparative theologian. As I treat comparative theology and transreligious theology here, both are religiously engaged practices. Comparative theology begins from a religious location and seeks to enrich it with learning that can be shared in that community, while transreligious theology engages with religious input in a \"free range\" manner, with no presumed outcome. Comparative theologians do not shy away from practice that becomes participation in another tradition, and transreligious theologians do not shy away from conclusions or actions that might place them more on one religious path than another. If to know only one religion is, in important respects, to know none, so too are those not pursuing any particular religious path partially disabled in knowing aspects of all others. Home points to the existential dimension always at play in this kind of scholarship, and this essay illustrates what that dimension looks like in my case. Such examples suggest the complexity nestled in the idea of home, a complexity with its own comparative theological character. If home is meant to indicate a reference point, it is a moving target for all of us. This article is framed around three aspects of that complexity: home as where we come from, where we live, and where we are going.","PeriodicalId":41209,"journal":{"name":"Toronto Journal of Theology","volume":"39 1","pages":"41 - 49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toronto Journal of Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/tjt-2023-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract:This article reflects on my experience of what it means to have a "home" as a comparative theologian. As I treat comparative theology and transreligious theology here, both are religiously engaged practices. Comparative theology begins from a religious location and seeks to enrich it with learning that can be shared in that community, while transreligious theology engages with religious input in a "free range" manner, with no presumed outcome. Comparative theologians do not shy away from practice that becomes participation in another tradition, and transreligious theologians do not shy away from conclusions or actions that might place them more on one religious path than another. If to know only one religion is, in important respects, to know none, so too are those not pursuing any particular religious path partially disabled in knowing aspects of all others. Home points to the existential dimension always at play in this kind of scholarship, and this essay illustrates what that dimension looks like in my case. Such examples suggest the complexity nestled in the idea of home, a complexity with its own comparative theological character. If home is meant to indicate a reference point, it is a moving target for all of us. This article is framed around three aspects of that complexity: home as where we come from, where we live, and where we are going.
三维的家:比较神学与跨宗教神学中的个人定位
摘要:本文反思了我作为比较神学家的“家”是什么意思。当我在这里讨论比较神学和跨宗教神学时,两者都是与宗教有关的实践。比较神学从一个宗教场所开始,并寻求通过可以在该社区共享的学习来丰富它,而跨宗教神学以一种“自由范围”的方式参与宗教输入,没有预设的结果。比较神学家不会回避成为另一种传统参与的实践,而跨宗教神学家不会回避可能使他们更倾向于一种宗教道路的结论或行动。如果在重要方面只了解一种宗教就等于不了解任何宗教,那么那些不追求任何特定宗教道路的人在了解所有其他宗教方面也是部分残疾的。霍姆指出存在主义的维度总是在这类学术中发挥作用,这篇文章说明了在我的案例中,这个维度是什么样子的。这样的例子表明,家的概念中隐藏着一种复杂性,一种具有比较神学特征的复杂性。如果家意味着一个参照点,那么它就是我们所有人的移动目标。本文围绕这种复杂性的三个方面展开:家,即我们从哪里来,我们住在哪里,我们要去哪里。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Toronto Journal of Theology is a progressive, double-blind refereed journal of analysis and scholarship, reflecting diverse Christian traditions and exploring the full range of theological inquiry: Biblical Studies, History of Christianity, Pastoral Theology, Christian Ethics, Systematic Theology, Philosophy of Religion, and Interdisciplinary Studies. The journal provides a Canadian forum for discussing theological issues in cross-cultural perspectives, featuring pertinent articles, in-depth reviews and information on the latest publications in the field. The Toronto Journal of Theology is of critical interest to academics, clergy, and lay and professional theologians. Anyone concerned with contemporary opinion on theological issues will find the journal essential reading.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信