Can nuclear arms control be revived in the era of nuclear multipolarity?

Q2 Social Sciences
M. Carranza
{"title":"Can nuclear arms control be revived in the era of nuclear multipolarity?","authors":"M. Carranza","doi":"10.1080/10736700.2022.2075643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The conventional wisdom is that there is a new great-power competition among the United States, Russia, and China, as they have shown a renewed interest in modernizing their nuclear arsenals while reaffirming the centrality of nuclear weapons in their internationalsecurity policy and nuclear strategy. There is an impending multipolar nuclear arms race while important nuclear-arms-control treaties negotiated during the Cold War, such as the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty (ABM) and the Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, have disappeared. The combination of the return to great-power rivalry, the deterioration of the international-security environment since Russia’s annexation of Crimea in 2014, and aggressive nuclear doctrines creates the danger of nuclear use in regional conflict scenarios. Under these circumstances, can arms control be revived? These two books give an affirmative answer. Despite their important differences, they complement each other and make a significant contribution to the literature on nuclear arms control in the era of nuclear multipolarity. Winning and Losing the Nuclear Peace is the latest book from Michael Krepon, a leading specialist on South Asian security who is the cofounder of the Stimson Center inWashington, DC. The book provides a thorough and intensive historical analysis that starts with a prehistory of nuclear arms control: the Acheson-Lilienthal Report, the failed Baruch Plan, how atomic scientists became political actors, and how the enormous anxiety provoked by the first use of nuclear weapons in Hiroshima and Nagasaki was “institutionalized” through deterrence theory. The prehistory chapter ends with the first Soviet nuclear test, in 1949; the US decision to develop the hydrogen bomb; “NSC-68,” a document produced by the US National Security Council that provided “a comprehensive... assessment of the nature of the Soviet threat and what to do about it” (p. 41); and the launch in 1957 of Sputnik, a Russian satellite that could carry a nuclear bomb. The book is divided into seven sections covering the rise of nuclear arms control in the 1950s and 1960s, the pivotal summit meeting between US President Ronald Reagan and Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev in Geneva in","PeriodicalId":35157,"journal":{"name":"Nonproliferation Review","volume":"28 1","pages":"417 - 428"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nonproliferation Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10736700.2022.2075643","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The conventional wisdom is that there is a new great-power competition among the United States, Russia, and China, as they have shown a renewed interest in modernizing their nuclear arsenals while reaffirming the centrality of nuclear weapons in their internationalsecurity policy and nuclear strategy. There is an impending multipolar nuclear arms race while important nuclear-arms-control treaties negotiated during the Cold War, such as the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty (ABM) and the Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, have disappeared. The combination of the return to great-power rivalry, the deterioration of the international-security environment since Russia’s annexation of Crimea in 2014, and aggressive nuclear doctrines creates the danger of nuclear use in regional conflict scenarios. Under these circumstances, can arms control be revived? These two books give an affirmative answer. Despite their important differences, they complement each other and make a significant contribution to the literature on nuclear arms control in the era of nuclear multipolarity. Winning and Losing the Nuclear Peace is the latest book from Michael Krepon, a leading specialist on South Asian security who is the cofounder of the Stimson Center inWashington, DC. The book provides a thorough and intensive historical analysis that starts with a prehistory of nuclear arms control: the Acheson-Lilienthal Report, the failed Baruch Plan, how atomic scientists became political actors, and how the enormous anxiety provoked by the first use of nuclear weapons in Hiroshima and Nagasaki was “institutionalized” through deterrence theory. The prehistory chapter ends with the first Soviet nuclear test, in 1949; the US decision to develop the hydrogen bomb; “NSC-68,” a document produced by the US National Security Council that provided “a comprehensive... assessment of the nature of the Soviet threat and what to do about it” (p. 41); and the launch in 1957 of Sputnik, a Russian satellite that could carry a nuclear bomb. The book is divided into seven sections covering the rise of nuclear arms control in the 1950s and 1960s, the pivotal summit meeting between US President Ronald Reagan and Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev in Geneva in
在核多极化时代,核军备控制能否复活?
传统观点认为,美国、俄罗斯和中国之间存在着新的大国竞争,因为它们对核武库现代化表现出了新的兴趣,同时重申了核武器在其国际安全政策和核战略中的中心地位。多极核军备竞赛迫在眉睫,而冷战期间谈判达成的重要核军备控制条约,如《反弹道导弹条约》和《中程核力量条约》,已经消失。自2014年俄罗斯吞并克里米亚以来,大国竞争的回归、国际安全环境的恶化,以及咄咄逼人的核理论,共同造成了在地区冲突场景中使用核武器的危险。在这种情况下,军备控制能否恢复?这两本书给出了肯定的答案。尽管它们有着重要的差异,但它们相互补充,为核多极化时代的核军备控制文献做出了重大贡献。《核和平的胜利与失败》是南亚安全领域的顶尖专家、华盛顿特区史汀生中心的联合创始人迈克尔·克雷彭的最新著作。这本书提供了一个全面而深入的历史分析,从核军备控制的史前史开始:艾奇逊-利林塔尔报告、失败的巴鲁克计划、原子科学家如何成为政治行动者,以及广岛和长崎首次使用核武器引发的巨大焦虑如何通过威慑理论“制度化”。史前史一章以1949年苏联第一次核试验结束;美国决定研制氢弹;“NSC-68”,一份由美国国家安全委员会编制的文件,提供了“对苏联威胁的性质以及如何应对的全面……评估”(第41页);以及1957年发射的Sputnik,一颗可以携带核弹的俄罗斯卫星。这本书分为七个部分,涵盖了20世纪50年代和60年代核军备控制的兴起,以及美国总统罗纳德·里根和苏联领导人米哈伊尔·戈尔巴乔夫于年在日内瓦举行的关键峰会
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nonproliferation Review
Nonproliferation Review Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信