Socialism with Bling: Aspiration, Decency, and Exclusivity in Contemporary Cuba

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q4 CULTURAL STUDIES
J. Loss
{"title":"Socialism with Bling: Aspiration, Decency, and Exclusivity in Contemporary Cuba","authors":"J. Loss","doi":"10.1080/13569325.2021.1937965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article engages a pervasive discourse on decency in twenty-first-century social mores and state prohibitions by examining artists’ work (2016–2019) that speaks to how material culture and aesthetic judgment feed into the aesthetic hegemony of the Cuban state. Attention is paid to three cases that unravel a national and international staging of a universal “decent” Cuban culture in the post-Obama era: (1) the 2017 intervention Where is Mella? by “amateur” artist Luis Manuel Otero Alcántara, who called attention to the Cuban military’s commercial alliance with Kempinksi, the Swiss/German hotel group, critiquing Cuba’s new landscape of luxury; (2) Pluto (2016), video art by Geandy Pavón that alludes to a chain of embezzlements and substitutions; and (3) the performances of two “amateur” musicians: Chocolate MC, who, though popular, is also deemed repulsive on both sides of the Florida Straits, and Cimafunk, celebrated as a cultural ambassador. A contemplation on “excess” – a 5-star hotel, junk jewellery, or bling bling – allows for questions of who the Cuban state recognises as an artist, how artists appropriate and expropriate ideas of luxury and refinement, and whether these substitutions can sufficiently erode colonial legacies that continue to contain those subjectivities perceived as excessive.","PeriodicalId":56341,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13569325.2021.1937965","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13569325.2021.1937965","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article engages a pervasive discourse on decency in twenty-first-century social mores and state prohibitions by examining artists’ work (2016–2019) that speaks to how material culture and aesthetic judgment feed into the aesthetic hegemony of the Cuban state. Attention is paid to three cases that unravel a national and international staging of a universal “decent” Cuban culture in the post-Obama era: (1) the 2017 intervention Where is Mella? by “amateur” artist Luis Manuel Otero Alcántara, who called attention to the Cuban military’s commercial alliance with Kempinksi, the Swiss/German hotel group, critiquing Cuba’s new landscape of luxury; (2) Pluto (2016), video art by Geandy Pavón that alludes to a chain of embezzlements and substitutions; and (3) the performances of two “amateur” musicians: Chocolate MC, who, though popular, is also deemed repulsive on both sides of the Florida Straits, and Cimafunk, celebrated as a cultural ambassador. A contemplation on “excess” – a 5-star hotel, junk jewellery, or bling bling – allows for questions of who the Cuban state recognises as an artist, how artists appropriate and expropriate ideas of luxury and refinement, and whether these substitutions can sufficiently erode colonial legacies that continue to contain those subjectivities perceived as excessive.
华而不实的社会主义:当代古巴的抱负、体面和排他性
本文通过研究艺术家的作品(2016-2019),对21世纪社会习俗和国家禁令中的得体进行了普遍的讨论,这些作品讲述了物质文化和审美判断如何融入古巴国家的审美霸权。本文关注了三个案例,它们揭示了后奥巴马时代普遍的“体面”古巴文化在国内和国际上的表现:(1)2017年的干预行动:梅拉在哪里?“业余”艺术家路易斯·曼努埃尔·奥特罗Alcántara,他呼吁人们关注古巴军方与瑞士/德国酒店集团凯宾斯基(Kempinksi)的商业联盟,批评古巴的新奢侈品格局;(2)《冥王星》(Pluto, 2016), Geandy Pavón的录像艺术作品,暗示了一连串的盗用和替代;(3)两位“业余”音乐家的表演:朱古力·MC,他虽然很受欢迎,但在佛罗里达海峡两岸都被认为是令人反感的,还有被誉为文化大使的西马芬克。对“过度”的思考——五星级酒店、垃圾珠宝或珠光珠光——让人想到古巴政府承认谁是艺术家,艺术家如何挪用和剥夺奢侈和精致的想法,以及这些替代是否能够充分侵蚀殖民遗产,这些遗产继续包含那些被认为是过度的主观性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信