Statistical downscaling in the Tropics and Mid-latitudes: a comparative assessment over two representative regions.

IF 2.6 3区 地球科学 Q3 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Alfonso Hernanz, Carlos Correa, M. Domínguez, Esteban Rodríguez-Guisado, E. Rodríguez‐Camino
{"title":"Statistical downscaling in the Tropics and Mid-latitudes: a comparative assessment over two representative regions.","authors":"Alfonso Hernanz, Carlos Correa, M. Domínguez, Esteban Rodríguez-Guisado, E. Rodríguez‐Camino","doi":"10.1175/jamc-d-22-0164.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nStatistical downscaling (SD) of climate change projections is a key piece for impact and adaptation studies, due to its low computational expense compared to dynamical downscaling, which allows to explore uncertainties through the generation of large ensembles. SD has been extensively evaluated and applied in the extratropics, but few examples exist in tropical regions. In this study several state-of-the-art methods belonging to different families have been evaluated for maximum/minimum daily temperature and daily accumulated precipitation (both from the ERA5 reanalysis at 0.25°) in two regions with very different climates: Spain (Mid-latitudes) and Central America (Tropics). Some key assumptions of SD have been tested: the strength of the predictors/predictand links, the skill of different approaches and the extrapolation capability of each method. It has been found that relevant predictors are different in both regions, as well as the behavior of statistical methods. For temperature, most methods perform significantly better in Spain than in Central America, where Transfer Function methods present important extrapolation problems, probably due to the low variability of the training sample (present climate). In both regions, Model Output Statistics (MOS) methods have achieved the best results for temperature. In Central America Transfer Function (TF) methods have achieved better results than MOS methods in the evaluation in the present climate, but they do not preserve trends in the future. For precipitation, MOS methods and the machine learning method eXtreme Gradient Boost have achieved the best results in both regions. Additionally, it has been found that although the use of humidity indexes as predictors improve results for the downscaling of precipitation, future trends given by statistical methods are very sensitive to the use of one or another index. Three indexes have been compared: relative humidity, specific humidity and dew point depression. The use of the specific humidity has been found to seriously deviate trends given by the downscaled projections from those given by raw Global Climate Models in both regions.","PeriodicalId":15027,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/jamc-d-22-0164.1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Statistical downscaling (SD) of climate change projections is a key piece for impact and adaptation studies, due to its low computational expense compared to dynamical downscaling, which allows to explore uncertainties through the generation of large ensembles. SD has been extensively evaluated and applied in the extratropics, but few examples exist in tropical regions. In this study several state-of-the-art methods belonging to different families have been evaluated for maximum/minimum daily temperature and daily accumulated precipitation (both from the ERA5 reanalysis at 0.25°) in two regions with very different climates: Spain (Mid-latitudes) and Central America (Tropics). Some key assumptions of SD have been tested: the strength of the predictors/predictand links, the skill of different approaches and the extrapolation capability of each method. It has been found that relevant predictors are different in both regions, as well as the behavior of statistical methods. For temperature, most methods perform significantly better in Spain than in Central America, where Transfer Function methods present important extrapolation problems, probably due to the low variability of the training sample (present climate). In both regions, Model Output Statistics (MOS) methods have achieved the best results for temperature. In Central America Transfer Function (TF) methods have achieved better results than MOS methods in the evaluation in the present climate, but they do not preserve trends in the future. For precipitation, MOS methods and the machine learning method eXtreme Gradient Boost have achieved the best results in both regions. Additionally, it has been found that although the use of humidity indexes as predictors improve results for the downscaling of precipitation, future trends given by statistical methods are very sensitive to the use of one or another index. Three indexes have been compared: relative humidity, specific humidity and dew point depression. The use of the specific humidity has been found to seriously deviate trends given by the downscaled projections from those given by raw Global Climate Models in both regions.
热带和中纬度地区的统计降尺度:对两个代表性地区的比较评估。
气候变化预测的统计降尺度(SD)是影响和适应研究的关键部分,因为与动态降尺度相比,其计算费用较低,动态降尺度可以通过生成大型集合来探索不确定性。SD在温带地区得到了广泛的评估和应用,但在热带地区很少有例子。在这项研究中,对西班牙(中纬度)和中美洲(热带)这两个气候截然不同的地区的最高/最低日温度和日累积降水量(均来自0.25°的ERA5再分析),评估了属于不同家族的几种最先进的方法。SD的一些关键假设已经过测试:预测因子/预测和链接的强度、不同方法的技能以及每种方法的外推能力。研究发现,这两个地区的相关预测因素以及统计方法的行为都不同。就温度而言,大多数方法在西班牙的表现明显好于中美洲,在中美洲,传递函数方法存在重要的外推问题,这可能是由于训练样本的低可变性(当前气候)。在这两个区域,模型输出统计(MOS)方法都获得了最佳的温度结果。在中美洲,传递函数(TF)方法在当前气候下的评估中取得了比MOS方法更好的结果,但它们不能保持未来的趋势。对于降水,MOS方法和机器学习方法eXtreme Gradient Boost在这两个地区都取得了最好的结果。此外,已经发现,尽管使用湿度指数作为预测因子可以改善降水量缩减的结果,但统计方法给出的未来趋势对使用一个或另一个指数非常敏感。比较了三个指标:相对湿度、比湿度和露点下降。已经发现,在这两个地区,比湿度的使用严重偏离了缩小预测给出的趋势与原始全球气候模型给出的趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
97
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology (JAMC) (ISSN: 1558-8424; eISSN: 1558-8432) publishes applied research on meteorology and climatology. Examples of meteorological research include topics such as weather modification, satellite meteorology, radar meteorology, boundary layer processes, physical meteorology, air pollution meteorology (including dispersion and chemical processes), agricultural and forest meteorology, mountain meteorology, and applied meteorological numerical models. Examples of climatological research include the use of climate information in impact assessments, dynamical and statistical downscaling, seasonal climate forecast applications and verification, climate risk and vulnerability, development of climate monitoring tools, and urban and local climates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信