Effects of Error Modulation-Based Visual and Haptic Feedback Fusion Strategies on Motor Learning and Motivation

IF 1.8 4区 计算机科学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Jingyan Meng, Na Li, Yang Hu, Dazheng Zhao, Guoning Li, Jingyan Hu, Tao Song, Yehao Ma, Rongzhen Fu, Guokun Zuo, Liang Tao, Min Tang, Yunfeng Liu, Changcheng Shi
{"title":"Effects of Error Modulation-Based Visual and Haptic Feedback Fusion Strategies on Motor Learning and Motivation","authors":"Jingyan Meng, Na Li, Yang Hu, Dazheng Zhao, Guoning Li, Jingyan Hu, Tao Song, Yehao Ma, Rongzhen Fu, Guokun Zuo, Liang Tao, Min Tang, Yunfeng Liu, Changcheng Shi","doi":"10.1155/2023/8974148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Visual or haptic feedback based on error modulation has been used to improve the effect of robot-assisted rehabilitation training. However, there are several investigations on the effects of error modulation-based visual and haptic feedback fusion strategies on motor learning and motivation. To observe the influence of different feedback fusion strategies on motor learning and motivation, a parallel controlled study was conducted, dividing 30 healthy subjects into three groups with similar skill levels. The no error modulation group received visual and haptic feedback without error modulation; the visual amplification haptic reduction group received visual error amplification combined with haptic error reduction, and the visual reduction haptic amplification (VRHA) group received visual error reduction combined with haptic error amplification. Each subject implemented a trajectory-tracking task with an upper limb rehabilitation robot. They went through baseline, training, assessment, and generalization tests and completed 340 consecutive tracking movements. To evaluate motor learning and motivation, the average tracking error, the root mean square (RMS) of surface electromyography (sEMG) signals, and the intrinsic motivation inventory scale were all examined. In the assessment tests, the average tracking error was significantly decreased in all three groups. In particular, the VRHA group had a larger reduction in average tracking error in the generalization test, lower RMS of sEMG signals both in the assessment and generalization tests and higher perceived competence in the assessment tests. The VRHA fusion strategy significantly improved the subjects’ motor learning and transfer ability, decreased muscle activation, and increased motor learning motivation. These findings may provide some new insights for multisensory feedback fusion technology in the application of rehabilitation robots.","PeriodicalId":8029,"journal":{"name":"Applied Bionics and Biomechanics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Bionics and Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8974148","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Visual or haptic feedback based on error modulation has been used to improve the effect of robot-assisted rehabilitation training. However, there are several investigations on the effects of error modulation-based visual and haptic feedback fusion strategies on motor learning and motivation. To observe the influence of different feedback fusion strategies on motor learning and motivation, a parallel controlled study was conducted, dividing 30 healthy subjects into three groups with similar skill levels. The no error modulation group received visual and haptic feedback without error modulation; the visual amplification haptic reduction group received visual error amplification combined with haptic error reduction, and the visual reduction haptic amplification (VRHA) group received visual error reduction combined with haptic error amplification. Each subject implemented a trajectory-tracking task with an upper limb rehabilitation robot. They went through baseline, training, assessment, and generalization tests and completed 340 consecutive tracking movements. To evaluate motor learning and motivation, the average tracking error, the root mean square (RMS) of surface electromyography (sEMG) signals, and the intrinsic motivation inventory scale were all examined. In the assessment tests, the average tracking error was significantly decreased in all three groups. In particular, the VRHA group had a larger reduction in average tracking error in the generalization test, lower RMS of sEMG signals both in the assessment and generalization tests and higher perceived competence in the assessment tests. The VRHA fusion strategy significantly improved the subjects’ motor learning and transfer ability, decreased muscle activation, and increased motor learning motivation. These findings may provide some new insights for multisensory feedback fusion technology in the application of rehabilitation robots.
基于错误调节的视觉和触觉反馈融合策略对运动学习和动机的影响
基于误差调制的视觉或触觉反馈已被用于提高机器人辅助康复训练的效果。然而,基于错误调节的视觉和触觉反馈融合策略对运动学习和动机的影响研究并不多见。为了观察不同反馈融合策略对运动学习和动机的影响,采用平行对照研究,将30名健康受试者分为3组。无误差调制组接受无误差调制的视觉和触觉反馈;视觉缩小触觉缩小组采用视觉误差缩小与触觉误差缩小联合治疗,视觉缩小触觉放大(VRHA)组采用视觉误差缩小与触觉误差放大联合治疗。每个受试者都使用上肢康复机器人执行轨迹跟踪任务。他们经历了基线、训练、评估和泛化测试,并完成了340个连续的跟踪动作。为了评估运动学习和动机,我们检测了平均跟踪误差、表面肌电信号均方根(RMS)和内在动机量表。在评估测试中,三组的平均跟踪误差都显著降低。特别是,VRHA组在泛化测试中的平均跟踪误差降低幅度更大,在评估和泛化测试中表面肌电信号的均方根均更低,在评估测试中感知能力更高。VRHA融合策略显著提高了被试的运动学习和转移能力,降低了肌肉激活,增加了运动学习动机。这些发现可能为多感官反馈融合技术在康复机器人中的应用提供一些新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Bionics and Biomechanics
Applied Bionics and Biomechanics ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-ROBOTICS
自引率
4.50%
发文量
338
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Applied Bionics and Biomechanics publishes papers that seek to understand the mechanics of biological systems, or that use the functions of living organisms as inspiration for the design new devices. Such systems may be used as artificial replacements, or aids, for their original biological purpose, or be used in a different setting altogether.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信