Peacekeepers in Combat: Protecting Civilians in the D.R. Congo

Q4 Social Sciences
A. Dorn
{"title":"Peacekeepers in Combat: Protecting Civilians in the D.R. Congo","authors":"A. Dorn","doi":"10.1163/18754112-26010003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nLargely uncredited in public media and academic literature, the United Nations has used armed force frequently in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (drc), probably more than in any other UN peacekeeping operation. Though unheralded, this saved lives and protected cities and towns. However, attacks on civilians in drc are so frequent and widespread that many times the mission has been unable to respond in a timely fashion. To save more lives and gain trust in the local population, a much greater UN effort is needed to support robust measures, with more resources, determination and accountability (for inaction as well as action), even as “donor fatigue” sets in for a mission that has been operating since 1999. Still, it is important for peacekeeping as a whole to recognize and learn from cases of use of force against Congolese illegal armed groups (iag s), like the adf, cndp, fdlr, frpi, and M23. These cases show some remarkable successes, including removing some major poc threats, fracturing rebel groups, increasing UN deterrence, and enhancing the rule of law in the still untamed “Wild East” of the immense African country.","PeriodicalId":38927,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Peacekeeping","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Peacekeeping","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18754112-26010003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Largely uncredited in public media and academic literature, the United Nations has used armed force frequently in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (drc), probably more than in any other UN peacekeeping operation. Though unheralded, this saved lives and protected cities and towns. However, attacks on civilians in drc are so frequent and widespread that many times the mission has been unable to respond in a timely fashion. To save more lives and gain trust in the local population, a much greater UN effort is needed to support robust measures, with more resources, determination and accountability (for inaction as well as action), even as “donor fatigue” sets in for a mission that has been operating since 1999. Still, it is important for peacekeeping as a whole to recognize and learn from cases of use of force against Congolese illegal armed groups (iag s), like the adf, cndp, fdlr, frpi, and M23. These cases show some remarkable successes, including removing some major poc threats, fracturing rebel groups, increasing UN deterrence, and enhancing the rule of law in the still untamed “Wild East” of the immense African country.
战斗中的维和人员:保护刚果民主共和国的平民
联合国在公共媒体和学术文献中大多未经编辑,经常在刚果民主共和国使用武装力量,可能比任何其他联合国维和行动都多。尽管无人知晓,但这拯救了生命,保护了城镇。然而,刚果民主共和国对平民的袭击如此频繁和广泛,以至于特派团多次无法及时作出反应。为了挽救更多的生命并获得当地人民的信任,联合国需要做出更大的努力,以更多的资源、决心和问责制(对不作为和行动)来支持强有力的措施,即使自1999年以来一直在运作的特派团出现了“捐助者疲劳症”。尽管如此,对整个维和行动来说,重要的是要认识到并从对刚果非法武装团体使用武力的案例中吸取教训 s) ,如adf、cndp、fdlr、frpi和M23。这些案例显示了一些显著的成功,包括消除了一些主要的poc威胁,瓦解了反叛组织,增强了联合国的威慑力,并在这个巨大的非洲国家仍然未被开垦的“狂野东方”加强了法治。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of International Peacekeeping
Journal of International Peacekeeping Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信