Embracing Complexity and Diversity: A Vision of Early Childhood Curriculum

IF 2.7 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Weipeng Yang (杨伟鹏)
{"title":"Embracing Complexity and Diversity: A Vision of Early Childhood Curriculum","authors":"Weipeng Yang (杨伟鹏)","doi":"10.1177/20965311221141446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This book, co-authored by Philip Hui Li and Jennifer J. Chen (2023), offers a critical set of theoretical frameworks that can help bridge the policy–practice and belief–practice gaps widely documented in the existing research literature on Early Childhood Curriculum (ECC) reforms in different contexts, especially in the Global South (e.g., Altinyelken, 2010; Bautista et al., 2021; Sikoyo, 2010; Yang & Li, 2022). Li and Chen (2023) make a strong argument that meanwhile promotes an advanced understanding of ECC. In this book, aligned with a recent line of research (e.g., Bautista et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2017; Yang & Li, 2022), they propose a new hybrid model for curriculum making in early childhood as they present the historical evolution of theoretical perspectives on ECC. Alternative frameworks are presented in this book to provoke Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) stakeholders to reflect on a reliance on the developmental perspective. Li and Chen (2023) criticize the simplistic, naive, and fragmented traditional discourse, despite its being widely taken for granted, and fully restore the complexity and diversification of ECC by paving a “middle way” via a “fusion” discourse that may be inspired by the Doctrine of the Mean (or “Zhongyong” [中庸]) in Confucianism. Various old and new theories are explained in simple","PeriodicalId":33103,"journal":{"name":"ECNU Review of Education","volume":"6 1","pages":"349 - 351"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ECNU Review of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311221141446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This book, co-authored by Philip Hui Li and Jennifer J. Chen (2023), offers a critical set of theoretical frameworks that can help bridge the policy–practice and belief–practice gaps widely documented in the existing research literature on Early Childhood Curriculum (ECC) reforms in different contexts, especially in the Global South (e.g., Altinyelken, 2010; Bautista et al., 2021; Sikoyo, 2010; Yang & Li, 2022). Li and Chen (2023) make a strong argument that meanwhile promotes an advanced understanding of ECC. In this book, aligned with a recent line of research (e.g., Bautista et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2017; Yang & Li, 2022), they propose a new hybrid model for curriculum making in early childhood as they present the historical evolution of theoretical perspectives on ECC. Alternative frameworks are presented in this book to provoke Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) stakeholders to reflect on a reliance on the developmental perspective. Li and Chen (2023) criticize the simplistic, naive, and fragmented traditional discourse, despite its being widely taken for granted, and fully restore the complexity and diversification of ECC by paving a “middle way” via a “fusion” discourse that may be inspired by the Doctrine of the Mean (or “Zhongyong” [中庸]) in Confucianism. Various old and new theories are explained in simple
拥抱复杂性和多样性:幼儿课程的愿景
本书由Philip Hui Li和Jennifer J. Chen(2023)共同撰写,提供了一套关键的理论框架,可以帮助弥合政策-实践和信念-实践之间的差距,这些差距广泛记录在现有的关于不同背景下的幼儿课程(ECC)改革的研究文献中,特别是在全球南方(例如,Altinyelken, 2010;Bautista et al., 2021;Sikoyo, 2010;Yang & Li, 2022)。Li和Chen(2023)提出了一个强有力的论点,同时促进了对ECC的深入理解。在这本书中,与最近的一系列研究(例如,Bautista等人,2021;Chen et al., 2017;Yang & Li, 2022),他们提出了一种新的幼儿课程制定混合模型,因为他们展示了ECC理论观点的历史演变。在这本书中提出了替代框架,以激发幼儿教育和护理(ECEC)利益相关者反思对发展观点的依赖。Li和Chen(2023)批判了传统话语的简单化、幼稚和碎片化,尽管它被广泛认为是理所当然的,并通过一种可能受到儒家中庸启发的“融合”话语,充分恢复了ECC的复杂性和多样性。各种新旧理论都作了简单的解释
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ECNU Review of Education
ECNU Review of Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信