Family Social Capital Among Adolescents that Are Users and Non-users of Social Media

IF 0.5 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Narjes Geraee, A. Eslami
{"title":"Family Social Capital Among Adolescents that Are Users and Non-users of Social Media","authors":"Narjes Geraee, A. Eslami","doi":"10.5812/ijpbs-83102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Considering the time spent with family is essential for the growth and development of adolescents, the replacement of these times with using social media can raise questions. Objectives: This study addressed the question of whether there is a difference in family social capital between adolescents that are users and non-users of social media. Methods: Data were collected from 3600 adolescents aged 12 - 19 years in Isfahan, Iran, using a cross-sectional study design with stratified, 2-stage cluster sampling. Participants were recruited from schools and surveyed between January and March 2017. Family social capital was assessed using a researcher-made questionnaire with adequate validity and reliability. The independent 2-sample t-test, Kruskal-Wallis test, 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Games-Howell post hoc test were used to analyze the data. Results: More than 76% of the adolescents were social media users. Males reported higher membership rates compared to females. There was a meaningful difference between the mean scores in all dimensions of family social capital, including family interactions, family cohesion, family monitoring, and family conflicts (P < 0.001), and the non-user group scored better in these dimensions. There were gender-based differences between some dimensions of family social capital (P < 0.05). There were no statistically meaningful differences between the frequencies of users in the 3 socioeconomic classes of the study (P > 0.05). Some dimensions of family social capital, including family cohesion and family monitoring, were better in users from higher socioeconomic classes (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The results indicate a difference in the family social capital between adolescents that are users and non-users of social media.","PeriodicalId":46644,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/ijpbs-83102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Considering the time spent with family is essential for the growth and development of adolescents, the replacement of these times with using social media can raise questions. Objectives: This study addressed the question of whether there is a difference in family social capital between adolescents that are users and non-users of social media. Methods: Data were collected from 3600 adolescents aged 12 - 19 years in Isfahan, Iran, using a cross-sectional study design with stratified, 2-stage cluster sampling. Participants were recruited from schools and surveyed between January and March 2017. Family social capital was assessed using a researcher-made questionnaire with adequate validity and reliability. The independent 2-sample t-test, Kruskal-Wallis test, 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Games-Howell post hoc test were used to analyze the data. Results: More than 76% of the adolescents were social media users. Males reported higher membership rates compared to females. There was a meaningful difference between the mean scores in all dimensions of family social capital, including family interactions, family cohesion, family monitoring, and family conflicts (P < 0.001), and the non-user group scored better in these dimensions. There were gender-based differences between some dimensions of family social capital (P < 0.05). There were no statistically meaningful differences between the frequencies of users in the 3 socioeconomic classes of the study (P > 0.05). Some dimensions of family social capital, including family cohesion and family monitoring, were better in users from higher socioeconomic classes (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The results indicate a difference in the family social capital between adolescents that are users and non-users of social media.
社交媒体使用者与非使用者青少年的家庭社会资本
背景:考虑到与家人共度的时间对青少年的成长和发展至关重要,使用社交媒体取代这些时间可能会引发问题。目的:本研究探讨了使用和不使用社交媒体的青少年在家庭社会资本方面是否存在差异的问题。方法:采用分层两阶段整群抽样的横断面研究设计,收集了伊朗伊斯法罕3600名12 - 19岁青少年的数据。参与者从学校招募,并于2017年1月至3月期间接受调查。家庭社会资本的评估采用研究者自编的问卷,具有足够的效度和信度。采用独立双样本t检验、Kruskal-Wallis检验、单因素方差分析(ANOVA)和Games-Howell事后检验对数据进行分析。结果:超过76%的青少年是社交媒体用户。与女性相比,男性的入会率更高。家庭社会资本在家庭互动、家庭凝聚力、家庭监控和家庭冲突四个维度上的得分均有显著性差异(P < 0.001),且非用户组在这些维度上得分更高。家庭社会资本的某些维度存在性别差异(P < 0.05)。本研究中3个社会经济阶层的用户使用频率差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。家庭凝聚力和家庭监控在家庭社会资本维度上,社会经济阶层越高的用户表现越好(P < 0.05)。结论:使用和不使用社交媒体的青少年在家庭社会资本方面存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: The Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (IJPBS) is an international quarterly peer-reviewed journal which is aimed at promoting communication among researchers worldwide and welcomes contributions from authors in all areas of psychiatry, psychology, and behavioral sciences. The journal publishes original contributions that have not previously been submitted for publication elsewhere. Manuscripts are received with the understanding that they are submitted solely to the IJPBS. Upon submission, they become the property of the Publisher and that the data in the manuscript have been reviewed by all authors, who agree to the analysis of the data and the conclusions reached in the manuscript. The Publisher reserves copyright and renewal on all published material and such material may not be reproduced without the written permission of the Publisher. Statements in articles are the responsibility of the authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信