Development of a QSAR model to predict comedogenic potential of some cosmetic ingredients

IF 3.1 Q2 TOXICOLOGY
Sebla Oztan Akturk, Gulcin Tugcu, Hande Sipahi
{"title":"Development of a QSAR model to predict comedogenic potential of some cosmetic ingredients","authors":"Sebla Oztan Akturk,&nbsp;Gulcin Tugcu,&nbsp;Hande Sipahi","doi":"10.1016/j.comtox.2021.100207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Comedogenicity is a common adverse reaction to cosmetic ingredients that cause blackheads or pimples by blocking the pores, especially for acne-prone skin. Before animal testing was banned by European Commission in 2013, comedogenic potential of cosmetics were tested on rabbits. However, full replacement of animal tests by alternatives has not been possible yet. Therefore, there is a need for applying new approach methodologies. In this study, we aimed to develop a QSAR model to predict comedogenic potential of cosmetic ingredients by using different machine learning algorithms and types of molecular descriptors.</p><p>The dataset consists of 121 cosmetic ingredients including such as fatty acids, fatty alcohols and their derivatives and pigments tested on rabbit ears was obtained from the literature. 4837 molecular descriptors were calculated via various software. Different machine learning classification algorithms were used in the modelling studies with WEKA software. The model performance was evaluated by using 10-fold cross validation. All models were compared by the means of classification accuracy, area under the ROC curve, area under the precision-recall curve, MCC, F score, kappa statistic, sensitivity, specificity and the best model was chosen accordingly. The QSAR modelling results for two models are promising for comedogenicity prediction. The random forest models by the means of Mold2 and alvaDesc descriptors gave the successful results with 85.87% and 84.87% accuracy for the cross-validated models and 75.86% and 79.31% accuracy for the test sets. In conclusion, this study is the first step in terms of comedogenicity prediction. In the near future, advances in <em>in silico</em> modelling studies will provide us non-animal based alternative models by regarding animal rights and ethical issues for the safety evaluation of cosmetics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37651,"journal":{"name":"Computational Toxicology","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100207"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468111321000530","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Comedogenicity is a common adverse reaction to cosmetic ingredients that cause blackheads or pimples by blocking the pores, especially for acne-prone skin. Before animal testing was banned by European Commission in 2013, comedogenic potential of cosmetics were tested on rabbits. However, full replacement of animal tests by alternatives has not been possible yet. Therefore, there is a need for applying new approach methodologies. In this study, we aimed to develop a QSAR model to predict comedogenic potential of cosmetic ingredients by using different machine learning algorithms and types of molecular descriptors.

The dataset consists of 121 cosmetic ingredients including such as fatty acids, fatty alcohols and their derivatives and pigments tested on rabbit ears was obtained from the literature. 4837 molecular descriptors were calculated via various software. Different machine learning classification algorithms were used in the modelling studies with WEKA software. The model performance was evaluated by using 10-fold cross validation. All models were compared by the means of classification accuracy, area under the ROC curve, area under the precision-recall curve, MCC, F score, kappa statistic, sensitivity, specificity and the best model was chosen accordingly. The QSAR modelling results for two models are promising for comedogenicity prediction. The random forest models by the means of Mold2 and alvaDesc descriptors gave the successful results with 85.87% and 84.87% accuracy for the cross-validated models and 75.86% and 79.31% accuracy for the test sets. In conclusion, this study is the first step in terms of comedogenicity prediction. In the near future, advances in in silico modelling studies will provide us non-animal based alternative models by regarding animal rights and ethical issues for the safety evaluation of cosmetics.

Abstract Image

预测某些化妆品成分致粉刺潜力的QSAR模型的开发
粉刺原性是一种常见的不良反应,因为化妆品成分会堵塞毛孔,导致黑头或粉刺,尤其是容易长痘的皮肤。在2013年欧盟委员会禁止动物实验之前,化妆品的致痘性测试是在兔子身上进行的。然而,目前还不可能用替代方法完全取代动物试验。因此,有必要应用新的方法方法。在这项研究中,我们旨在建立一个QSAR模型,通过使用不同的机器学习算法和分子描述符类型来预测化妆品成分的粉刺形成潜力。该数据集由121种化妆品成分组成,包括脂肪酸、脂肪醇及其衍生物和兔耳上测试的色素。通过各种软件计算了4837个分子描述符。在WEKA软件的建模研究中使用了不同的机器学习分类算法。采用10倍交叉验证对模型性能进行评价。通过分类准确率、ROC曲线下面积、精密度-召回率曲线下面积、MCC、F评分、kappa统计量、灵敏度、特异性等指标对各模型进行比较,选出最佳模型。两种模型的QSAR模拟结果都有望用于粉刺的预测。通过Mold2和alvaDesc描述符建立的随机森林模型得到了成功的结果,交叉验证模型的准确率分别为85.87%和84.87%,测试集的准确率分别为75.86%和79.31%。总之,本研究是粉刺形成预测的第一步。在不久的将来,计算机模拟研究的进展将为我们提供非基于动物的替代模型,通过考虑动物权利和伦理问题来评估化妆品的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computational Toxicology
Computational Toxicology Computer Science-Computer Science Applications
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Computational Toxicology is an international journal publishing computational approaches that assist in the toxicological evaluation of new and existing chemical substances assisting in their safety assessment. -All effects relating to human health and environmental toxicity and fate -Prediction of toxicity, metabolism, fate and physico-chemical properties -The development of models from read-across, (Q)SARs, PBPK, QIVIVE, Multi-Scale Models -Big Data in toxicology: integration, management, analysis -Implementation of models through AOPs, IATA, TTC -Regulatory acceptance of models: evaluation, verification and validation -From metals, to small organic molecules to nanoparticles -Pharmaceuticals, pesticides, foods, cosmetics, fine chemicals -Bringing together the views of industry, regulators, academia, NGOs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信