Validity of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children test - 2nd edition in older adolescents

IF 0.9 Q4 SPORT SCIENCES
Acta Gymnica Pub Date : 2019-06-30 DOI:10.5507/AG.2019.008
Ludvík Valtr, R. Psotta
{"title":"Validity of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children test - 2nd edition in older adolescents","authors":"Ludvík Valtr, R. Psotta","doi":"10.5507/AG.2019.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The Movement Assessment Battery for Children test - 2nd edition (MABC-2) is one of the most commonly used tools to assess motor coordination in children. The question for clinical and psychological practice is whether the age band 3 (AB3) could be suitable also for 17-19-year-old adolescents. Objective: To examine the validity of the MABC-2 - AB3 test for 17-19-year-old adolescents. Methods: : One hundred twenty participants (60 boys and 60 girls) were assessed using the AB3 of the MABC-2 test. The validity of the AB3 for 17-19-year-old adolescents was assessed using two procedures: (1) analysis of the age factor for performance in AB3 tasks (Kruskal-Wallis test), (2) the confirmatory factor analysis using the IBM SPSS AMOS 22.0 version performed on the test scores to verify the three-factor structure of the MABC-2 test. Results: Age was an important factor only in the unimanual task performed with the dominant and non-dominant hand, and in the bimanual task. The data of the 17-19-year-old participants did not fit to the original three-factor model of the MABC-2 test but fit to the modified model with two latent factors - manual dexterity and aiming & catching (χ2(25) = 28.224, p = .298, relative χ2 = 1.129, root-mean-square-error of approximation = .033, goodness of fit index = 0.966, adjusted goodness of fit index = 0.920, and Tucker-Lewis index = 0.977). Conclusions: The AB3 version of the MABC-2 test indicated unsatisfactory validity for the assessment of motor competency in 17-19-year-old adolescents. The aiming and catching tasks, together with unimanual and bimanual coordination tasks seem to be applicable in psychological, educational and clinical practice for motor testing of older adolescents. However, the creation of new norms for older adolescents should be taken into consideration.","PeriodicalId":51894,"journal":{"name":"Acta Gymnica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Gymnica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5507/AG.2019.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The Movement Assessment Battery for Children test - 2nd edition (MABC-2) is one of the most commonly used tools to assess motor coordination in children. The question for clinical and psychological practice is whether the age band 3 (AB3) could be suitable also for 17-19-year-old adolescents. Objective: To examine the validity of the MABC-2 - AB3 test for 17-19-year-old adolescents. Methods: : One hundred twenty participants (60 boys and 60 girls) were assessed using the AB3 of the MABC-2 test. The validity of the AB3 for 17-19-year-old adolescents was assessed using two procedures: (1) analysis of the age factor for performance in AB3 tasks (Kruskal-Wallis test), (2) the confirmatory factor analysis using the IBM SPSS AMOS 22.0 version performed on the test scores to verify the three-factor structure of the MABC-2 test. Results: Age was an important factor only in the unimanual task performed with the dominant and non-dominant hand, and in the bimanual task. The data of the 17-19-year-old participants did not fit to the original three-factor model of the MABC-2 test but fit to the modified model with two latent factors - manual dexterity and aiming & catching (χ2(25) = 28.224, p = .298, relative χ2 = 1.129, root-mean-square-error of approximation = .033, goodness of fit index = 0.966, adjusted goodness of fit index = 0.920, and Tucker-Lewis index = 0.977). Conclusions: The AB3 version of the MABC-2 test indicated unsatisfactory validity for the assessment of motor competency in 17-19-year-old adolescents. The aiming and catching tasks, together with unimanual and bimanual coordination tasks seem to be applicable in psychological, educational and clinical practice for motor testing of older adolescents. However, the creation of new norms for older adolescents should be taken into consideration.
儿童运动评估成套测验的有效性——第2版,年龄较大的青少年
背景:儿童运动评估测试-第二版(MABC-2)是评估儿童运动协调最常用的工具之一。临床和心理实践的问题是,3年龄段(AB3)是否也适用于17-19岁的青少年。目的:探讨MABC-2 - AB3测试在17-19岁青少年中的效度。方法:对120名参与者(男60名,女60名)进行MABC-2测试的AB3评估。采用两种方法对17-19岁青少年的AB3效度进行评估:(1)分析AB3任务表现的年龄因素(Kruskal-Wallis检验),(2)采用IBM SPSS AMOS 22.0版本对测试成绩进行验证性因素分析,以验证MABC-2测试的三因素结构。结果:年龄仅在优势手和非优势手单手任务和双手任务中是重要的影响因素。17-19岁被试的数据不符合原MABC-2检验的三因素模型,而符合修正后的手工灵巧性和瞄准接球两个潜在因素模型(χ2(25) = 28.224, p = 0.298,相对χ2 = 1.129,近似均方根误差= 0.033,拟合优度指数= 0.966,调整拟合优度指数= 0.920,Tucker-Lewis指数= 0.977)。结论:MABC-2测验的AB3版对17-19岁青少年运动能力的评估效度不理想。瞄准和捕捉任务以及单手和双手协调任务似乎适用于大龄青少年运动测试的心理、教育和临床实践。但是,应该考虑为年龄较大的青少年制定新的规范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Gymnica
Acta Gymnica SPORT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal "Acta Gymnica" (ISSN 2336-4912 (Print); ISSN 2336-4920 (On-line)), published formerly as "Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis. Gymnica" (ISSN 1212-1185 (Print); ISSN 1213-8312 (On-line)), focuses on presenting results of research studies and theoretical studies from the field of kinanthropology. The scope of the journal covers topics related to biomechanics, exercise physiology, physiotherapy, somatometry, sports psychology, sports training, physical education, public health, etc. The journal also welcomes submissions that present results of interdisciplinary research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信