A. Tayeb, J. Le Cam, M. Grédiac, E. Toussaint, E. Robin, X. Balandraud, F. Canévet
{"title":"Identifying hyperelastic constitutive parameters with sensitivity‐based virtual fields","authors":"A. Tayeb, J. Le Cam, M. Grédiac, E. Toussaint, E. Robin, X. Balandraud, F. Canévet","doi":"10.1111/str.12397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work deals with the identification of hyperelastic constitutive parameters using the virtual fields method. The choice of the virtual displacement fields is a crucial aspect of the method, typically for reducing the sensitivity to the measurement noise. A first and simple option is to generate the virtual displacement fields randomly. Nevertheless, in case of hyperelastic models for which the stress is not a linear function of the constitutive parameters, improving the choice of the virtual displacement fields is not trivial and an alternative strategy has to be found. In the present study, the sensitivity‐based virtual fields approach is applied and compared with the randomly generated virtual displacement fields approach. Two material models were considered: the Mooney model, which describes quite well the behavior of hyperelastic materials for small and moderate strains, and the Ogden model, which accounts for the stress hardening phenomenon observed at higher strains. The full kinematic fields are measured by using the digital image correlation technique during an equibiaxial tensile test performed on a cruciform specimen. Identification results are discussed through their capability to predict the external force measured during the test. The sensitivity‐based virtual fields approach is found to improve significantly the prediction compared with the randomly generated virtual displacement fields approach.","PeriodicalId":51176,"journal":{"name":"Strain","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strain","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/str.12397","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Abstract
This work deals with the identification of hyperelastic constitutive parameters using the virtual fields method. The choice of the virtual displacement fields is a crucial aspect of the method, typically for reducing the sensitivity to the measurement noise. A first and simple option is to generate the virtual displacement fields randomly. Nevertheless, in case of hyperelastic models for which the stress is not a linear function of the constitutive parameters, improving the choice of the virtual displacement fields is not trivial and an alternative strategy has to be found. In the present study, the sensitivity‐based virtual fields approach is applied and compared with the randomly generated virtual displacement fields approach. Two material models were considered: the Mooney model, which describes quite well the behavior of hyperelastic materials for small and moderate strains, and the Ogden model, which accounts for the stress hardening phenomenon observed at higher strains. The full kinematic fields are measured by using the digital image correlation technique during an equibiaxial tensile test performed on a cruciform specimen. Identification results are discussed through their capability to predict the external force measured during the test. The sensitivity‐based virtual fields approach is found to improve significantly the prediction compared with the randomly generated virtual displacement fields approach.
期刊介绍:
Strain is an international journal that contains contributions from leading-edge research on the measurement of the mechanical behaviour of structures and systems. Strain only accepts contributions with sufficient novelty in the design, implementation, and/or validation of experimental methodologies to characterize materials, structures, and systems; i.e. contributions that are limited to the application of established methodologies are outside of the scope of the journal. The journal includes papers from all engineering disciplines that deal with material behaviour and degradation under load, structural design and measurement techniques. Although the thrust of the journal is experimental, numerical simulations and validation are included in the coverage.
Strain welcomes papers that deal with novel work in the following areas:
experimental techniques
non-destructive evaluation techniques
numerical analysis, simulation and validation
residual stress measurement techniques
design of composite structures and components
impact behaviour of materials and structures
signal and image processing
transducer and sensor design
structural health monitoring
biomechanics
extreme environment
micro- and nano-scale testing method.