E-learning for WASH systems strengthening: lessons from a capacity-building platform

IF 1.5 Q4 WATER RESOURCES
A. Leal, A. Saleh, J. Verhoeven
{"title":"E-learning for WASH systems strengthening: lessons from a capacity-building platform","authors":"A. Leal, A. Saleh, J. Verhoeven","doi":"10.2166/h2oj.2022.066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Research was undertaken to evaluate the performance of the Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH) Systems Academy, a free e-learning platform. The course, ‘WASH systems strengthening: The basics’, was assessed in three different learning arrangements: Case 1: MOOC (Massive Open Online Course, self-paced and self-guided), Case 2: MOOC with structured support, and Case 3: MOOC with blended learning. In each of these cases, the extent to which e-learning can contribute to improved understanding and application of WASH systems strengthening was investigated. The research was conducted between October 2020 and July 2021 using a modified Kirkpatrick model supplemented by the Outcome Harvesting methodology to assess which MOOC format was successful in performance and application. The study analysed data from the e-learning platform, user surveys, and interviews with water and sanitation e-learning experts and selected users. A comparison of the cases demonstrated that overall, the three learning arrangements were effective based on the reactions of the users, with completion rates of 21, 65, and 100% for MOOC, MOOC with structured support, and MOOC with blended learning, respectively. The MOOC with a blended learning approach was the most effective in terms of performance. This approach allowed participants to have a better understanding of the content with extra face-to-face support while completing the course.","PeriodicalId":36060,"journal":{"name":"H2Open Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"H2Open Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/h2oj.2022.066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Research was undertaken to evaluate the performance of the Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH) Systems Academy, a free e-learning platform. The course, ‘WASH systems strengthening: The basics’, was assessed in three different learning arrangements: Case 1: MOOC (Massive Open Online Course, self-paced and self-guided), Case 2: MOOC with structured support, and Case 3: MOOC with blended learning. In each of these cases, the extent to which e-learning can contribute to improved understanding and application of WASH systems strengthening was investigated. The research was conducted between October 2020 and July 2021 using a modified Kirkpatrick model supplemented by the Outcome Harvesting methodology to assess which MOOC format was successful in performance and application. The study analysed data from the e-learning platform, user surveys, and interviews with water and sanitation e-learning experts and selected users. A comparison of the cases demonstrated that overall, the three learning arrangements were effective based on the reactions of the users, with completion rates of 21, 65, and 100% for MOOC, MOOC with structured support, and MOOC with blended learning, respectively. The MOOC with a blended learning approach was the most effective in terms of performance. This approach allowed participants to have a better understanding of the content with extra face-to-face support while completing the course.
加强讲卫生系统的电子学习:来自能力建设平台的经验教训
开展研究以评估水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)系统学院(一个免费的电子学习平台)的绩效。这门名为“WASH系统强化:基础”的课程以三种不同的学习方式进行了评估:案例1:MOOC(大规模开放在线课程,自定进度和自我指导),案例2:结构化支持的MOOC,以及案例3:混合学习的MOOC。在每一个案例中,都调查了电子学习在多大程度上有助于提高对加强讲卫生系统的理解和应用。该研究于2020年10月至2021年7月期间进行,使用了经过修改的柯克帕特里克模型,并辅以成果收获方法,以评估哪种MOOC格式在性能和应用方面取得了成功。该研究分析了来自电子学习平台、用户调查以及对水和卫生电子学习专家和选定用户的采访的数据。案例对比表明,总体而言,根据用户的反应,三种学习安排是有效的,MOOC、结构化支持的MOOC和混合学习的MOOC的完成率分别为21.5%、65%和100%。就成绩而言,采用混合学习方法的MOOC最有效。这种方法允许参与者在完成课程时通过额外的面对面支持更好地理解内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
H2Open Journal
H2Open Journal Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
47
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信