Blood Glucose Response to Unilateral and Bilateral Resistance Training Among Trained Women

Nur Khairunisa Abu Talip, Zulkifli Abdul Kadir, Zulkifli Ismail, Shahren Ahmad Zaidi Adruce, D. S. Suhaili
{"title":"Blood Glucose Response to Unilateral and Bilateral Resistance Training Among Trained Women","authors":"Nur Khairunisa Abu Talip, Zulkifli Abdul Kadir, Zulkifli Ismail, Shahren Ahmad Zaidi Adruce, D. S. Suhaili","doi":"10.17576/JSKM-2021-1901-10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Exercise selection is one of the crucial factors in designing a comprehensive training program. The exposure of different exercise selection may stimulate the specific adaptation imposed demand. In the construction of any resistance training (RT) program, it is important to choose whether to apply bilaterally (BI) or unilaterally (UNI) exercise. The present study aimed to look into the physiological responses of blood glucose (BG) between UNI and BI RT. The quantitative research method was used, RT (UNI versus BI training) as the independent variables whereas BG set as the dependent variable. In order to measure training effects following a single bout of different training intervention (UNI versus BI), a crossover experimental pre and post-test design were implemented. A total of sixteen (n = 16) trained women with a mean age of 23 (SD = 1.35) years old went through a single bout of RT involved a total body exercise using major muscles group with 80% of 1RM for each protocol (UNI and BI) for 10 repetitions to maximal effort (for 3 sets). Crossover design would be more accurate in exposing different training protocol to a similar characteristic of individuals as compared using different individuals. The results revealed that blood glucose (BG) was statistically changed (p < .001) across times, and finding shows there is no difference between training protocols (p = .39). Based on the results, it would be interesting to observe the blood glucose and/or energy metabolism between UNI versus BI RT during exercise as well as to investigate the relationship between BG and calories expenditure during exercises. Future research on UNI versus BI RT could venture onto other populations such as the untrained women, men population, elderly and specific population such as diabetic population in order to further understand the physiology of human body responded towards exercise. Other types of hormones analysis including insulin, growth hormone, and cortisol can be included. Besides, future research should consider a long run study that involves chronic adaptation of RT on the human body in order to prevent and alleviate disease.","PeriodicalId":17686,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Sains Kesihatan Malaysia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Sains Kesihatan Malaysia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17576/JSKM-2021-1901-10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Exercise selection is one of the crucial factors in designing a comprehensive training program. The exposure of different exercise selection may stimulate the specific adaptation imposed demand. In the construction of any resistance training (RT) program, it is important to choose whether to apply bilaterally (BI) or unilaterally (UNI) exercise. The present study aimed to look into the physiological responses of blood glucose (BG) between UNI and BI RT. The quantitative research method was used, RT (UNI versus BI training) as the independent variables whereas BG set as the dependent variable. In order to measure training effects following a single bout of different training intervention (UNI versus BI), a crossover experimental pre and post-test design were implemented. A total of sixteen (n = 16) trained women with a mean age of 23 (SD = 1.35) years old went through a single bout of RT involved a total body exercise using major muscles group with 80% of 1RM for each protocol (UNI and BI) for 10 repetitions to maximal effort (for 3 sets). Crossover design would be more accurate in exposing different training protocol to a similar characteristic of individuals as compared using different individuals. The results revealed that blood glucose (BG) was statistically changed (p < .001) across times, and finding shows there is no difference between training protocols (p = .39). Based on the results, it would be interesting to observe the blood glucose and/or energy metabolism between UNI versus BI RT during exercise as well as to investigate the relationship between BG and calories expenditure during exercises. Future research on UNI versus BI RT could venture onto other populations such as the untrained women, men population, elderly and specific population such as diabetic population in order to further understand the physiology of human body responded towards exercise. Other types of hormones analysis including insulin, growth hormone, and cortisol can be included. Besides, future research should consider a long run study that involves chronic adaptation of RT on the human body in order to prevent and alleviate disease.
女性单侧和双侧抗阻训练对血糖的影响
运动选择是设计综合训练计划的关键因素之一。不同运动选择的暴露可能刺激特定的适应强加的需求。在任何阻力训练(RT)项目的建设中,选择是双边(BI)还是单方面(UNI)练习是很重要的。本研究旨在探讨UNI和BI RT之间血糖(BG)的生理反应。采用定量研究方法,RT(UNI与BI训练)为自变量,BG集为因变量。为了测量单轮不同训练干预(UNI与BI)后的训练效果,实施了交叉实验测试前和测试后设计。共有16名(n=16)接受过训练的平均年龄为23岁(SD=1.35)的女性进行了一轮RT,包括使用主要肌肉组进行全身运动,每个方案(UNI和BI)的1RM为80%,重复10次,达到最大努力(3组)。与使用不同的个体相比,交叉设计将更准确地将不同的训练协议暴露于个体的相似特征。结果显示,血糖(BG)随时间的变化具有统计学意义(p<0.001),研究结果表明,训练方案之间没有差异(p=.39),观察运动期间UNI与BI-RT之间的血糖和/或能量代谢以及研究运动期间BG与卡路里消耗之间的关系将是有趣的。未来对UNI与BI RT的研究可以深入到其他人群,如未经训练的女性、男性、老年人和特定人群,如糖尿病人群,以进一步了解人体对运动的生理反应。其他类型的激素分析,包括胰岛素、生长激素和皮质醇也可以包括在内。此外,未来的研究应该考虑一项长期研究,涉及RT在人体上的慢性适应,以预防和减轻疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信