The junior doctor shadow board

Q4 Medicine
Joseph Home, A. Bidgood, S. Kalipershad
{"title":"The junior doctor shadow board","authors":"Joseph Home, A. Bidgood, S. Kalipershad","doi":"10.12968/bjhc.2022.0043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Before 2020, North Manchester General Hospital had a history of poor feedback from junior doctors, regarding both their overall experience and access to non-clinical development opportunities. The circumstances of the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in the medical leadership team giving junior doctors the opportunity to lead the reorganisation of services and redeployment. The aim of this was to increase engagement, representation and development opportunities. This led to the formation of the Junior Doctor Leaders Group, using similar principles as the ‘shadow boards’ seen in the corporate sector. This article reviews the impact of the group. Analysis was conducted using internal key performance indicators, identifying improvement initiatives generated by the Junior Doctor Leaders Group and surveying group members. Initial results suggest that junior doctors felt their voices had gained recognition in the organisation, with 95% of group members stating that it increased junior doctor representation and 90% agreeing that the group made them feel more confident representing and advocating for their colleagues. Increased transparency and trust between junior and senior staff facilitated escalation of concerns to higher management, and the design and implementation of solutions. Members of the Junior Doctor Leaders Group also reported improvements to their work and educational experiences. In the first year after the group was established, members led or co-led a total of 14 organisation-wide improvement projects. Results from the General Medical Council training survey showed improvement across almost all indicators. Therefore, the authors believe that the Junior Doctor Leaders Group offers a novel approach to improving junior doctor engagement and experience, and can be beneficial to both the cohort of junior doctors and the wider organisation.","PeriodicalId":35342,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Health Care Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Health Care Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/bjhc.2022.0043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Before 2020, North Manchester General Hospital had a history of poor feedback from junior doctors, regarding both their overall experience and access to non-clinical development opportunities. The circumstances of the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in the medical leadership team giving junior doctors the opportunity to lead the reorganisation of services and redeployment. The aim of this was to increase engagement, representation and development opportunities. This led to the formation of the Junior Doctor Leaders Group, using similar principles as the ‘shadow boards’ seen in the corporate sector. This article reviews the impact of the group. Analysis was conducted using internal key performance indicators, identifying improvement initiatives generated by the Junior Doctor Leaders Group and surveying group members. Initial results suggest that junior doctors felt their voices had gained recognition in the organisation, with 95% of group members stating that it increased junior doctor representation and 90% agreeing that the group made them feel more confident representing and advocating for their colleagues. Increased transparency and trust between junior and senior staff facilitated escalation of concerns to higher management, and the design and implementation of solutions. Members of the Junior Doctor Leaders Group also reported improvements to their work and educational experiences. In the first year after the group was established, members led or co-led a total of 14 organisation-wide improvement projects. Results from the General Medical Council training survey showed improvement across almost all indicators. Therefore, the authors believe that the Junior Doctor Leaders Group offers a novel approach to improving junior doctor engagement and experience, and can be beneficial to both the cohort of junior doctors and the wider organisation.
初级医生的影子板
在2020年之前,北曼彻斯特综合医院的初级医生对他们的整体经验和非临床发展机会的反馈都很差。新冠肺炎大流行的情况导致医疗领导团队为初级医生提供了领导服务重组和重新部署的机会。这样做的目的是增加参与度、代表性和发展机会。这导致了初级博士领导小组的成立,该小组使用了与企业部门的“影子委员会”类似的原则。本文回顾了该小组的影响。使用内部关键绩效指标进行分析,确定初级医生领导小组和调查小组成员提出的改进举措。初步结果表明,初级医生觉得他们的声音在组织中得到了认可,95%的小组成员表示这增加了初级医生的代表性,90%的人同意这个小组让他们更有信心代表和倡导同事。初级和高级工作人员之间的透明度和信任增加,有助于将关切问题升级到更高的管理层,并有助于设计和实施解决方案。初级医生领导小组成员还报告说,他们的工作和教育经历有所改善。在该小组成立后的第一年,成员们领导或共同领导了总共14个全组织的改进项目。医学总会培训调查的结果显示,几乎所有指标都有所改善。因此,作者认为,初级医生领导小组为提高初级医生的参与度和经验提供了一种新颖的方法,对初级医生群体和更广泛的组织都有好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: British Journal of Healthcare Management (BJHCM) is the independent monthly journal which is essential reading for all health service managers, policymakers, influencers and commentators. Launched in 1995, BJHCM mixes peer-reviewed management articles with interviews, analysis and comment to bring you a sharp, topical and valuable insight into what"s happening in and around the NHS. To reflect the way that the NHS is changing, the journal has recently received a major face-lift and several new features now appear alongside BJHCM"s excellent state-of-the-art review articles and celebrated columnists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信