Evaluating the performance of conventional DAF and PosiDAF processes for cyanobacteria separation at a pilot plant scale

IF 1.5 Q4 WATER RESOURCES
R. Yap, N. Rao, M. Holmes, M. Whittaker, R. Stuetz, B. Jefferson, V. Bulmus, W. Peirson, R. Henderson
{"title":"Evaluating the performance of conventional DAF and PosiDAF processes for cyanobacteria separation at a pilot plant scale","authors":"R. Yap, N. Rao, M. Holmes, M. Whittaker, R. Stuetz, B. Jefferson, V. Bulmus, W. Peirson, R. Henderson","doi":"10.2166/h2oj.2022.142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this work, a commercially available water treatment polymer poly(N,N-diallyl-N,N-dimethylammonium chloride) (PDADMAC) and a hydrophobically modified polymer (HMP) designed to adhere to bubble surfaces were applied for the first time in the novel Posi-dissolved air flotation process (PosiDAF) that uses polymer-modified bubbles, at pilot-scale for the treatment of waste stabilisation pond samples rich in algae. It was found that PDADMAC in PosiDAF gave comparable removal to that achieved using conventional DAF at >95% cell separation. Furthermore, the float layer was more uniform and thicker with up to 8% solid contents compared to conventional DAF, which comprised discrete floc clusters with an average solid concentration of ∼4.1%. In contrast to the use of PDADMAC, the application of the HMP did not achieve similarly good separation at pilot scale. It was hypothesised that this may be due to the micellisation of the HMP on the bubble surface, creating unstable bubbles that coalesced and prevented polymer–bubble–cell interactions, which are crucial for effective cell separation. On comparison of the costs of PosiDAF and conventional DAF, it was found that PosiDAF resulted in cost-savings of up to 74% due to low chemical consumption. In summary, PosiDAF reduced chemical cost and increased solid contents in the metal-free float.","PeriodicalId":36060,"journal":{"name":"H2Open Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"H2Open Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/h2oj.2022.142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this work, a commercially available water treatment polymer poly(N,N-diallyl-N,N-dimethylammonium chloride) (PDADMAC) and a hydrophobically modified polymer (HMP) designed to adhere to bubble surfaces were applied for the first time in the novel Posi-dissolved air flotation process (PosiDAF) that uses polymer-modified bubbles, at pilot-scale for the treatment of waste stabilisation pond samples rich in algae. It was found that PDADMAC in PosiDAF gave comparable removal to that achieved using conventional DAF at >95% cell separation. Furthermore, the float layer was more uniform and thicker with up to 8% solid contents compared to conventional DAF, which comprised discrete floc clusters with an average solid concentration of ∼4.1%. In contrast to the use of PDADMAC, the application of the HMP did not achieve similarly good separation at pilot scale. It was hypothesised that this may be due to the micellisation of the HMP on the bubble surface, creating unstable bubbles that coalesced and prevented polymer–bubble–cell interactions, which are crucial for effective cell separation. On comparison of the costs of PosiDAF and conventional DAF, it was found that PosiDAF resulted in cost-savings of up to 74% due to low chemical consumption. In summary, PosiDAF reduced chemical cost and increased solid contents in the metal-free float.
评价传统DAF和PosiDAF工艺在中试工厂蓝藻分离中的性能
在这项工作中,一种商用的水处理聚合物聚(N,N-二烯丙基-N,N-二甲氯化铵)(PDADMAC)和一种设计用于附着在气泡表面的疏水性改性聚合物(HMP)首次应用于新型的正溶气浮选工艺(PosiDAF),该工艺使用聚合物改性气泡,用于中试规模的富含藻类的废稳定池样品的处理。发现PosiDAF中的PDADMAC的去除率与使用常规DAF的去除率相当,细胞分离率为95%。此外,与传统DAF相比,该浮子层更均匀、更厚,固体含量高达8%,后者由分散的絮团组成,平均固体浓度为4.1%。与使用PDADMAC相比,HMP的应用在中试规模上没有达到同样好的分离效果。据推测,这可能是由于HMP在气泡表面的胶束作用,产生了不稳定的气泡,这些气泡聚集并阻止了聚合物-气泡-细胞的相互作用,而聚合物-气泡-细胞的相互作用对于有效的细胞分离至关重要。通过对PosiDAF和传统DAF的成本进行比较,发现PosiDAF由于化学品消耗低,可节省高达74%的成本。总之,PosiDAF降低了化学成本,增加了无金属浮子中的固体含量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
H2Open Journal
H2Open Journal Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
47
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信