An Evaluation of Social Studies Textbooks in Turkey: A Content Analysis for Curriculum and Content Design

Q3 Social Sciences
Necati Tomal, Murat Bayram Yılar
{"title":"An Evaluation of Social Studies Textbooks in Turkey: A Content Analysis for Curriculum and Content Design","authors":"Necati Tomal, Murat Bayram Yılar","doi":"10.33403/rigeo.579946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study is to evaluate the content of social studies textbooks, which are written and taught based upon the social studies curriculum adopted between 1968-2018, in terms of the curriculum and content designs, and some general educational principles. For this purpose, document analysis, one of the qualitative research methodology, was used in this study. Accordingly, 12 social studies textbooks for different levels of class written based upon the social studies curriculum adopted in 1968, are the primary document resources of the research. The curriculum, upon which the textbooks are based, was also used as resource. For data analysis, content analysis technique was used. The results obtained from the study show that the generally-adopted approach to develop the content of social studies textbooks was single-disciplinary approach before 2005; however it was replaced by interdisciplinary approach then, with the impact of changing curriculum. Another study result shows that the content of social studies textbooks was developed based upon the disciplines of history and geography in general, and also citizenship to a limited extent before 2005. However, as it is determined, many other disciplines such as psychology, sociology, economics, science and technology in addition to those specified above, have a major impact on the content of textbooks since this date. Also, the relevant results indicate that the knowledge content was much richer in textbooks before 2005; however, in the current social studies textbooks, the knowledge intensity has decreased as the knowledge variety has increased in time. It has been determined that the social studies textbooks are developed by considering the chronology and from near-to-far principles in general so far.","PeriodicalId":52147,"journal":{"name":"Review of International Geographical Education Online","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of International Geographical Education Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33403/rigeo.579946","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The objective of this study is to evaluate the content of social studies textbooks, which are written and taught based upon the social studies curriculum adopted between 1968-2018, in terms of the curriculum and content designs, and some general educational principles. For this purpose, document analysis, one of the qualitative research methodology, was used in this study. Accordingly, 12 social studies textbooks for different levels of class written based upon the social studies curriculum adopted in 1968, are the primary document resources of the research. The curriculum, upon which the textbooks are based, was also used as resource. For data analysis, content analysis technique was used. The results obtained from the study show that the generally-adopted approach to develop the content of social studies textbooks was single-disciplinary approach before 2005; however it was replaced by interdisciplinary approach then, with the impact of changing curriculum. Another study result shows that the content of social studies textbooks was developed based upon the disciplines of history and geography in general, and also citizenship to a limited extent before 2005. However, as it is determined, many other disciplines such as psychology, sociology, economics, science and technology in addition to those specified above, have a major impact on the content of textbooks since this date. Also, the relevant results indicate that the knowledge content was much richer in textbooks before 2005; however, in the current social studies textbooks, the knowledge intensity has decreased as the knowledge variety has increased in time. It has been determined that the social studies textbooks are developed by considering the chronology and from near-to-far principles in general so far.
土耳其社会教科书评价:课程与内容设计的内容分析
本研究的目的是评估以1968-2018年采用的社会研究课程为基础编写和教学的社会研究教科书的课程和内容设计以及一些一般教育原则。为此,本研究采用了定性研究方法之一的文献分析。因此,以1968年社会研究课程为基础编写的12本不同等级的社会研究教科书是研究的主要文献资源。教材所依据的课程也被用作资源。数据分析采用内容分析技术。研究结果表明:2005年以前,我国社会学科教材内容的开发普遍采用单一学科的方法;然而,在课程变化的影响下,它被跨学科的方法所取代。另一项研究结果显示,在2005年之前,社会教科书的内容主要以历史和地理学科为基础,并在一定程度上以公民学科为基础。然而,可以确定的是,除上述学科外,还有许多其他学科,如心理学、社会学、经济学、科学和技术,从这一天起对教科书的内容产生了重大影响。结果表明,2005年以前教材的知识内容要丰富得多;然而,在目前的社会教科书中,随着时间的推移,知识种类的增加,知识强度反而降低了。到目前为止,社会教科书的发展基本上是按照时间顺序和从近到远的原则进行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: RIGEO aims to bridge the gap between theory and practice in geography education and social studies education. It is open for rigorous research papers as well as all level teachers’ experience about good practice for geography lessons and discussion papers. RIGEO would like to lie both in theory or on research papers and practice of geography teachers’ in geography education and in addition to social studies education. RIGEO is eager to publish original papers in all aspects of geography education and social studies education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信