Capital buffers, business models and the probability of bank distress: a dynamic panel investigation

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Zied Saadaoui, Salma Mokdadi
{"title":"Capital buffers, business models and the probability of bank distress: a dynamic panel investigation","authors":"Zied Saadaoui, Salma Mokdadi","doi":"10.1108/jfrc-10-2022-0119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to improve the debate linking the business models of banks to their riskiness by checking if diversification exerts different impacts on the probability of bank distress depending on the level of capital buffers.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe paper focuses on a sample of listed bank holding companies observed between 2007:Q3 and 2022:Q4. The authors use three subindexes of bank diversification. The authors estimate a dynamic model specification using a system generalized method of moments with robust standard errors and consistent estimators under heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation within a panel. Sensitivity and robustness checks are performed.\n\n\nFindings\nAsset and income diversification increase the probability of distress in low-capitalized banks during normal periods (excluding periods of crises and high uncertainty). Concerning crisis periods, a marginal increase in asset diversification during the global financial crisis (GFC) and the COVID-19 pandemic crisis induces a more important increase in the probability of failure of well-capitalized banks relative to low-capitalized ones. Contrary to the results obtained for the GFC period, well-capitalized banks were found to pursue more careful funding diversification in reaction to the sudden increase of uncertainty during the Russia–Ukraine war.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nPrudential supervision should concentrate on well-capitalized banks to encompass unexpected excessive risk-taking during crisis periods. Regulatory requirements should constrain fragile banks to avoid pursuing assets and income diversification strategies that increase earnings volatility.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe main originality of this paper is to consider the interaction between three different dimensions of bank diversification and capital regulation during stable and unstable periods using the marginal effect analysis. Moreover, this paper uses, initially, the GFC as the reference crisis period to study the impact of capital buffers and diversification interactions on the probability of bank distress. Then, the authors extend the observation period until 2022:Q4 to include two additional major events, namely, the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine war.\n","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jfrc-10-2022-0119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to improve the debate linking the business models of banks to their riskiness by checking if diversification exerts different impacts on the probability of bank distress depending on the level of capital buffers. Design/methodology/approach The paper focuses on a sample of listed bank holding companies observed between 2007:Q3 and 2022:Q4. The authors use three subindexes of bank diversification. The authors estimate a dynamic model specification using a system generalized method of moments with robust standard errors and consistent estimators under heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation within a panel. Sensitivity and robustness checks are performed. Findings Asset and income diversification increase the probability of distress in low-capitalized banks during normal periods (excluding periods of crises and high uncertainty). Concerning crisis periods, a marginal increase in asset diversification during the global financial crisis (GFC) and the COVID-19 pandemic crisis induces a more important increase in the probability of failure of well-capitalized banks relative to low-capitalized ones. Contrary to the results obtained for the GFC period, well-capitalized banks were found to pursue more careful funding diversification in reaction to the sudden increase of uncertainty during the Russia–Ukraine war. Research limitations/implications Prudential supervision should concentrate on well-capitalized banks to encompass unexpected excessive risk-taking during crisis periods. Regulatory requirements should constrain fragile banks to avoid pursuing assets and income diversification strategies that increase earnings volatility. Originality/value The main originality of this paper is to consider the interaction between three different dimensions of bank diversification and capital regulation during stable and unstable periods using the marginal effect analysis. Moreover, this paper uses, initially, the GFC as the reference crisis period to study the impact of capital buffers and diversification interactions on the probability of bank distress. Then, the authors extend the observation period until 2022:Q4 to include two additional major events, namely, the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine war.
资本缓冲、商业模式和银行陷入困境的可能性:一项动态小组调查
本文旨在通过检验多元化是否会根据资本缓冲水平对银行陷入困境的概率产生不同的影响,来改善将银行的商业模式与其风险联系起来的争论。本文重点研究了2007年第三季度至2022年第四季度期间观察到的上市银行控股公司样本。作者使用了银行多元化的三个子指标。作者利用具有鲁棒标准误差和一致估计量的系统广义矩量方法估计了面板内异方差和自相关条件下的动态模型规格。进行了灵敏度和鲁棒性检查。发现资产和收入多样化增加了低资本银行在正常时期(不包括危机和高不确定性时期)陷入困境的可能性。就危机时期而言,在全球金融危机和2019冠状病毒病大流行危机期间,资产多样化的边际增加导致资本充足的银行相对于资本不足的银行倒闭的可能性更大。与全球金融危机期间获得的结果相反,资本充足的银行被发现追求更谨慎的资金多样化,以应对俄乌战争期间不确定性的突然增加。研究局限/启示审慎监管应集中在资本充足的银行,以遏制危机期间意外的过度冒险行为。监管要求应约束脆弱的银行,避免采取增加收益波动性的资产和收入多元化策略。本文的主要创新之处在于利用边际效应分析来考虑稳定和不稳定时期银行多元化三个不同维度与资本监管之间的相互作用。此外,本文首先将全球金融危机作为参考危机时期,研究资本缓冲和多元化相互作用对银行陷入困境概率的影响。然后,作者将观察期延长至2022年第四季度,以包括另外两个重大事件,即COVID-19大流行和俄罗斯-乌克兰战争。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信