The pathological politics of COVID-19

IF 1.8 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Aggie Hirst, Chris Rossdale
{"title":"The pathological politics of COVID-19","authors":"Aggie Hirst, Chris Rossdale","doi":"10.1080/21624887.2021.1904196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The emergence and rapid spread of COVID-19 transformed the world at a bewildering pace. Within a few short weeks, the pandemic reshaped lives everywhere. Nevertheless, while global is in its impact, the catastrophic effects of the pandemic have been far from uniform. Instead, they have traced the contours of, and further entrenched, existing structural inequalities and violences, most notably exacerbating global poverty and health inequality, racial hierarchies, gendered divisions of labour, and the margination of disabled people. Although many have recognised these tracings as a further indictment of the deep-rooted violence of prevailing conditions, eugenicist logics of disposability have shaped both intellectual and policy responses. However, even as it has tracked and intensified this violence, the pandemic has also revealed as fictions those hierarchies which frame Europe and the US as uniquely positioned to manage and administer crisis. The calamitous and still unfolding disasters of COVID management in the US and across much of Europe have shaken their deep-rooted claims to global supremacy. Nevertheless, the harm to lives and livelihoods is most acute in the Global South. And as wealthy nations secure their places at the front of the queue for vaccines, eager to declare the return to normality, the very inequalities which manifest in differential vulnerability to the pandemic will determine who will be left behind. The pieces featured in Issue One of this two-part collection examine these uneven and often catastrophic impacts across a range of global sites and systems. In addition, they explore practices of solidarity, mutual aid, and resistance that have emerged conterminously. Variously considering issues including vaccine access, migration and borders, emergency response and communications failures, teaching and learning, and stories of success from the Global South, the collection provides a series of snapshots into conceptualising and living with COVID-19. As we struggle to come to terms with the effects of last year on both our academic and everyday lives, we hope the Issue creates a space in which to reflect on, and make some sense of, the pathological politics of the pandemic.","PeriodicalId":29930,"journal":{"name":"Critical Studies on Security","volume":"9 1","pages":"46 - 47"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21624887.2021.1904196","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Studies on Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21624887.2021.1904196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The emergence and rapid spread of COVID-19 transformed the world at a bewildering pace. Within a few short weeks, the pandemic reshaped lives everywhere. Nevertheless, while global is in its impact, the catastrophic effects of the pandemic have been far from uniform. Instead, they have traced the contours of, and further entrenched, existing structural inequalities and violences, most notably exacerbating global poverty and health inequality, racial hierarchies, gendered divisions of labour, and the margination of disabled people. Although many have recognised these tracings as a further indictment of the deep-rooted violence of prevailing conditions, eugenicist logics of disposability have shaped both intellectual and policy responses. However, even as it has tracked and intensified this violence, the pandemic has also revealed as fictions those hierarchies which frame Europe and the US as uniquely positioned to manage and administer crisis. The calamitous and still unfolding disasters of COVID management in the US and across much of Europe have shaken their deep-rooted claims to global supremacy. Nevertheless, the harm to lives and livelihoods is most acute in the Global South. And as wealthy nations secure their places at the front of the queue for vaccines, eager to declare the return to normality, the very inequalities which manifest in differential vulnerability to the pandemic will determine who will be left behind. The pieces featured in Issue One of this two-part collection examine these uneven and often catastrophic impacts across a range of global sites and systems. In addition, they explore practices of solidarity, mutual aid, and resistance that have emerged conterminously. Variously considering issues including vaccine access, migration and borders, emergency response and communications failures, teaching and learning, and stories of success from the Global South, the collection provides a series of snapshots into conceptualising and living with COVID-19. As we struggle to come to terms with the effects of last year on both our academic and everyday lives, we hope the Issue creates a space in which to reflect on, and make some sense of, the pathological politics of the pandemic.
COVID-19的病态政治
新冠肺炎的出现和迅速传播以令人困惑的速度改变了世界。在短短几周内,疫情重塑了各地的生活。尽管如此,尽管全球都在受到影响,但疫情的灾难性影响远非一致。相反,他们追踪并进一步巩固了现有的结构性不平等和暴力,最明显的是加剧了全球贫困和健康不平等、种族等级制度、性别分工和残疾人的边缘化。尽管许多人已经认识到这些痕迹是对当前条件下根深蒂固的暴力行为的进一步控诉,但优生学的可支配性逻辑塑造了智力和政策反应。然而,尽管疫情追踪并加剧了这种暴力,但它也以虚构的方式揭示了那些将欧洲和美国视为管理和管理危机的独特地位的等级制度。美国和欧洲大部分地区的新冠肺炎管理灾难性且仍在上演,动摇了他们根深蒂固的全球霸主地位。然而,对生命和生计的危害在全球南方最为严重。随着富裕国家确保自己排在疫苗队伍的最前面,渴望宣布恢复正常,表现在对疫情的不同脆弱性上的不平等将决定谁将被落在后面。这本由两部分组成的合集第一期中的文章研究了全球一系列站点和系统中这些不均衡且往往是灾难性的影响。此外,他们探索了同时出现的团结、互助和抵抗的做法。该系列对疫苗获取、移民和边境、应急响应和通信故障、教学和学习以及全球南方的成功故事等问题进行了不同的考虑,为新冠肺炎的概念化和生活提供了一系列快照。在我们努力接受去年对我们学术和日常生活的影响之际,我们希望《问题》能创造一个空间,让我们反思并理解疫情的病理政治。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信