Comparison between outcome of Inside-out & Outside-in mastoidectomy

IF 0.1 Q4 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Md Afzal Karim, Md. Mostafizur Rahman, F. Nihar, A. Taous, Sheikh Mohammad Rafiqul Hossain, Abdul Baten Mollah
{"title":"Comparison between outcome of Inside-out & Outside-in mastoidectomy","authors":"Md Afzal Karim, Md. Mostafizur Rahman, F. Nihar, A. Taous, Sheikh Mohammad Rafiqul Hossain, Abdul Baten Mollah","doi":"10.3329/bjo.v24i1.45331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Chronic suppurative otitis media is a disease that is known worldwide and that is more common in developing countries. Many techniques are available for operating the disease. Objectives: To compare outcome between Inside-out & Outside-in mastoidectomy. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted to compare outcome between Inside-Out & Outside-in mastoidectomy. Period of study was from July’ 2010 to March, 2012 in the Department of Otolaryngology and Head-Neck Surgery, BSMMUDhaka Result: majority of the patient were found dry mastoid cavity 13(68.42%) and rest were wet mastoid cavity 6 (31.58%).On the other hand in outside–in mastoidectomy dry mastoid cavity were 80.6% and wet were 19.4%. In inside-out mastoidectomy, among 8 attic cholesteatoma cases 5(62.50%) had gained hearing (average 6.66 dB) and 3(37.50%) had no gain or loss of hearing (average 3.89dB); among 11 entire mastoid bowl cholesteatoma cases 3(27.27%) had gained of hearing (average 6.11dB) and 8(72.73%) had no gain or loss of hearing (average 6.87dB)","PeriodicalId":53915,"journal":{"name":"Bangladesh Journal of Otorhinolaryngology","volume":"24 1","pages":"29-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3329/bjo.v24i1.45331","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bangladesh Journal of Otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/bjo.v24i1.45331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Chronic suppurative otitis media is a disease that is known worldwide and that is more common in developing countries. Many techniques are available for operating the disease. Objectives: To compare outcome between Inside-out & Outside-in mastoidectomy. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted to compare outcome between Inside-Out & Outside-in mastoidectomy. Period of study was from July’ 2010 to March, 2012 in the Department of Otolaryngology and Head-Neck Surgery, BSMMUDhaka Result: majority of the patient were found dry mastoid cavity 13(68.42%) and rest were wet mastoid cavity 6 (31.58%).On the other hand in outside–in mastoidectomy dry mastoid cavity were 80.6% and wet were 19.4%. In inside-out mastoidectomy, among 8 attic cholesteatoma cases 5(62.50%) had gained hearing (average 6.66 dB) and 3(37.50%) had no gain or loss of hearing (average 3.89dB); among 11 entire mastoid bowl cholesteatoma cases 3(27.27%) had gained of hearing (average 6.11dB) and 8(72.73%) had no gain or loss of hearing (average 6.87dB)
内外联合乳突切除术的疗效比较
背景:慢性化脓性中耳炎是一种众所周知的疾病,在发展中国家更为常见。有许多技术可用于治疗这种疾病。目的:比较乳突内切与外切的疗效。方法:采用横断面研究,比较内翻式和外翻式乳突切除术的疗效。研究时间为2010年7月至2012年3月,于BSMMUDhaka耳鼻咽喉头颈外科就诊。结果:多数患者为干性乳突腔13例(68.42%),其余为湿性乳突腔6例(31.58%)。由外而内的乳突切除术中,干性乳突腔占80.6%,湿性乳突腔占19.4%。内-外乳突切除术8例中,5例(62.50%)听力恢复(平均6.66 dB), 3例(37.50%)听力无增减(平均3.89dB);11例全乳突碗胆脂瘤中听力恢复3例(27.27%)(平均6.11dB),无听力恢复8例(72.73%)(平均6.87dB)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信