F. Scherbaum, Nana Mzhavanadze, Sebastian Rosenzweig, Meinard Müller
{"title":"Tuning Systems of Traditional Georgian Singing Determined From a New Corpus of Field Recordings","authors":"F. Scherbaum, Nana Mzhavanadze, Sebastian Rosenzweig, Meinard Müller","doi":"10.33906/musicologist.1068947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study we examine the tonal organization of the 2016 GVM dataset, a newly-created corpus of high-quality multimedia field recordings of traditional Georgian singing (with focus on Svaneti) which we collected during the summer of 2016. Because of the peculiarities of the performance practice of traditional Svan singing (e.g, exhibiting a considerable gradual pitch drift and a non-western tuning system), we developed a new processing pipeline for the computational analysis of non-western polyphonic music which was subsequently used to determine the melodic and harmonic tuning systems for the complete 2016 GVM dataset. In this context, we investigated the stability of the obtained tuning systems from an ensemble-, a song-, and a corpus-related perspective to evaluate under what conditions a single tuning system might be representative for current Svan performance practice. Furthermore, we compared the resulting Svan tuning systems with the tuning systems obtained for the Erkomaishvili dataset (Rosenzweig et al. 2020) in the study by Scherbaum et al. (2020). In comparison to a 12-TET (12-tone-equal-temperament) system, the Erkomaishvili and the Svan tuning systems are surprisingly similar. Both systems show a strong presence of pure fourths (500 cents) and fifths (700 cents), and ‘neutral’ thirds (peaking around 350 cents) as well as ‘neutral’ sixths. In addition, the sizes of the melodic and the harmonic seconds in both tuning system differ systematically from each other, with the size of the harmonic second second (close to 200 cents) being systematically larger than the melodic one (often between 150 and 180 cents). The current results underline the need for new unbiased representation forms for non-western music as they raise serious questions with respect to the practice of transcribing traditional Georgian music into a western notation system in which neither the ‘neutral’ intervals nor the gradual pitch drifts can be appropriately represented.","PeriodicalId":29680,"journal":{"name":"Musicologist","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musicologist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33906/musicologist.1068947","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
In this study we examine the tonal organization of the 2016 GVM dataset, a newly-created corpus of high-quality multimedia field recordings of traditional Georgian singing (with focus on Svaneti) which we collected during the summer of 2016. Because of the peculiarities of the performance practice of traditional Svan singing (e.g, exhibiting a considerable gradual pitch drift and a non-western tuning system), we developed a new processing pipeline for the computational analysis of non-western polyphonic music which was subsequently used to determine the melodic and harmonic tuning systems for the complete 2016 GVM dataset. In this context, we investigated the stability of the obtained tuning systems from an ensemble-, a song-, and a corpus-related perspective to evaluate under what conditions a single tuning system might be representative for current Svan performance practice. Furthermore, we compared the resulting Svan tuning systems with the tuning systems obtained for the Erkomaishvili dataset (Rosenzweig et al. 2020) in the study by Scherbaum et al. (2020). In comparison to a 12-TET (12-tone-equal-temperament) system, the Erkomaishvili and the Svan tuning systems are surprisingly similar. Both systems show a strong presence of pure fourths (500 cents) and fifths (700 cents), and ‘neutral’ thirds (peaking around 350 cents) as well as ‘neutral’ sixths. In addition, the sizes of the melodic and the harmonic seconds in both tuning system differ systematically from each other, with the size of the harmonic second second (close to 200 cents) being systematically larger than the melodic one (often between 150 and 180 cents). The current results underline the need for new unbiased representation forms for non-western music as they raise serious questions with respect to the practice of transcribing traditional Georgian music into a western notation system in which neither the ‘neutral’ intervals nor the gradual pitch drifts can be appropriately represented.
在本研究中,我们研究了2016年GVM数据集的音调组织,这是我们在2016年夏天收集的传统格鲁吉亚歌唱(重点是Svaneti)的高质量多媒体现场录音新创建的语料库。由于传统Svan歌唱表演实践的特殊性(例如,表现出相当大的渐变音高漂移和非西方调音系统),我们开发了一种新的处理管道,用于非西方复调音乐的计算分析,随后用于确定完整的2016 GVM数据集的旋律和谐波调音系统。在这种情况下,我们从合奏、歌曲和语料库相关的角度研究了所获得的调谐系统的稳定性,以评估在什么条件下单个调谐系统可能代表当前的Svan表演实践。此外,我们将得到的Svan调谐系统与Scherbaum et al.(2020)的研究中为Erkomaishvili数据集(Rosenzweig et al. 2020)获得的调谐系统进行了比较。与12-TET (12-tone-equal-temperament)系统相比,Erkomaishvili和Svan的调音系统惊人地相似。这两个系统都显示出大量的纯四分之一(500美分)和五分之一(700美分),“中性”三分之一(峰值约为350美分)和“中性”六分之一。此外,两种调音系统的旋律秒和谐波秒的大小也存在系统差异,其中谐波秒的大小(接近200分)系统地大于旋律秒的大小(通常在150分到180分之间)。目前的结果强调了对非西方音乐新的无偏见表现形式的需要,因为它们提出了关于将传统格鲁吉亚音乐转录为西方符号系统的实践的严重问题,其中“中性”音程和逐渐的音高漂移都不能适当地表示。