The comparison of the dimensionality results provided by the automated item selection procedure and DETECT analysis

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Ezgi Mor Dirlik, S. Kartal
{"title":"The comparison of the dimensionality results provided by the automated item selection procedure and DETECT analysis","authors":"Ezgi Mor Dirlik, S. Kartal","doi":"10.21449/ijate.1059200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The dimensionality is one of the most investigated concepts in the psychological assessment, and there are many ways to determine the dimensionality of a measured construct. The Automated Item Selection Procedure (AISP) and the DETECT are non-parametric methods aiming to determine the factorial structure of a data set. In the current study, dimensionality results provided by the two methods were compared based on the original factorial structure defined by the scale developers. For the comparison of the two methods, the data was obtained by implementing a scale measuring academic dishonesty levels of bachelor students. The scale was conducted on junior students studying at a public and a private university. The dataset was analyzed by using the AISP and DETECT analyses. The “mokken” and “sirt” packages on the R program were utilized for the AISP and DETECT analyses, respectively. The similarities and differences between the findings provided by the methods were analyzed depending on the original factor structure of the scale verified by the scale developers.","PeriodicalId":42417,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.1059200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The dimensionality is one of the most investigated concepts in the psychological assessment, and there are many ways to determine the dimensionality of a measured construct. The Automated Item Selection Procedure (AISP) and the DETECT are non-parametric methods aiming to determine the factorial structure of a data set. In the current study, dimensionality results provided by the two methods were compared based on the original factorial structure defined by the scale developers. For the comparison of the two methods, the data was obtained by implementing a scale measuring academic dishonesty levels of bachelor students. The scale was conducted on junior students studying at a public and a private university. The dataset was analyzed by using the AISP and DETECT analyses. The “mokken” and “sirt” packages on the R program were utilized for the AISP and DETECT analyses, respectively. The similarities and differences between the findings provided by the methods were analyzed depending on the original factor structure of the scale verified by the scale developers.
由自动项目选择程序和DETECT分析提供的维度结果的比较
维度是心理评估中研究最多的概念之一,有很多方法可以确定被测结构的维度。自动项目选择程序(AISP)和DETECT是非参数方法,旨在确定数据集的因子结构。在本研究中,基于量表开发人员定义的原始析因结构,对两种方法提供的维度结果进行了比较。为了比较这两种方法,数据是通过实施测量学士生学业不诚实程度的量表获得的。该量表是针对在公立和私立大学学习的低年级学生进行的。使用AISP和DETECT分析对数据集进行了分析。R程序中的“mokken”和“sirt”软件包分别用于AISP和DETECT分析。根据量表开发人员验证的量表原始因子结构,分析了这些方法提供的结果之间的异同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education
International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
11.10%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信