A scale of grades for evaluation of herbicide weed control efficiency

IF 0.2 Q4 AGRONOMY
G. Miranda, Marcelo Bregagnoli, Raphael Antônio Prado Dias
{"title":"A scale of grades for evaluation of herbicide weed control efficiency","authors":"G. Miranda, Marcelo Bregagnoli, Raphael Antônio Prado Dias","doi":"10.18406/2316-1817v13n320211621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present work aims to describe a proposal of scale of grades for analysis of herbicide efficiency to make results of researches closer to the technical reality. The proposed scale of grades is based on a 5-percentage point scale (5-PPS), i.e., the weed control grade 1 is 0% to 4%, grade 2 is 5% to 9%, and so on up to 20 (95% to 99%) and 21 (100% weed control). This scale was based on three factors. The first considers the decreases in the coefficient of variation and standard deviation in statistical analyses, which improve the precision of results, when compared to a 20-percentage point scale (20-PPS), and the detection of significant differences between means that are not detected in the 20-PPS. The second factor is based on the comparison of the described symptomatologic analysis that attributes 5 grades that are, analogically, a 20-PPS. The proposed scale improves the statistical and agronomical evaluations. Therefore, the proposed methodology is better in differentiating results of weed control efficiency in field evaluations. The third factor considers improvements in the interpretation of results of herbicide efficiency, enabling the use of higher grades in the scale for studies on resistance to herbicides by indicating the selection pressure. It is concluded that the use of the proposed grading scale reduces the coefficient of variation and results in a better interpretation of the technical reality of the effects of herbicides.","PeriodicalId":43096,"journal":{"name":"Revista Agrogeoambiental","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Agrogeoambiental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18406/2316-1817v13n320211621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present work aims to describe a proposal of scale of grades for analysis of herbicide efficiency to make results of researches closer to the technical reality. The proposed scale of grades is based on a 5-percentage point scale (5-PPS), i.e., the weed control grade 1 is 0% to 4%, grade 2 is 5% to 9%, and so on up to 20 (95% to 99%) and 21 (100% weed control). This scale was based on three factors. The first considers the decreases in the coefficient of variation and standard deviation in statistical analyses, which improve the precision of results, when compared to a 20-percentage point scale (20-PPS), and the detection of significant differences between means that are not detected in the 20-PPS. The second factor is based on the comparison of the described symptomatologic analysis that attributes 5 grades that are, analogically, a 20-PPS. The proposed scale improves the statistical and agronomical evaluations. Therefore, the proposed methodology is better in differentiating results of weed control efficiency in field evaluations. The third factor considers improvements in the interpretation of results of herbicide efficiency, enabling the use of higher grades in the scale for studies on resistance to herbicides by indicating the selection pressure. It is concluded that the use of the proposed grading scale reduces the coefficient of variation and results in a better interpretation of the technical reality of the effects of herbicides.
除草剂除草效果等级评定表
本工作旨在提出一种用于除草剂效率分析的等级尺度,使研究结果更接近技术实际。建议的等级等级是基于5个百分点的等级(5-PPS),即杂草控制等级1为0%至4%,等级2为5%至9%,以此类推至20(95%至99%)和21(100%杂草控制)。该量表基于三个因素。第一个考虑了统计分析中变异系数和标准偏差的降低,与20个百分点的量表(20-PPS)相比,这提高了结果的精度,并检测了20-PPS中未检测到的均值之间的显着差异。第二个因素是基于所描述的症状分析的比较,该分析将5个等级类比为20-PPS。该量表改进了统计和农艺评价。因此,该方法能较好地区分田间杂草防治效果评价结果。第三个因素考虑到对除草剂效率结果解释的改进,通过表明选择压力,可以在研究除草剂抗性的尺度中使用更高的等级。结论是,所提出的分级标准的使用降低了变异系数,从而更好地解释了除草剂效果的技术现实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信