Molecular Prevalence of Entamoeba Species among Diarrheal Patients in Eastern Kenya

Caroline Makena Lepore, L. Kamau, E. Kanduma
{"title":"Molecular Prevalence of Entamoeba Species among Diarrheal Patients in Eastern Kenya","authors":"Caroline Makena Lepore, L. Kamau, E. Kanduma","doi":"10.24018/ejbio.2022.3.1.304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data on the epidemiology of Entamoeba infections in Eastern part of Kenya is scanty. Diagnostic tests in use have limited capacity to differentiate common infecting species. The performance of Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) to differentiate between pathogenic Entamoeba histolytica and two nonpathogenic species E. dispar and E. moshkovskii is largely undetermined. Therefore, this study sought to determine the prevalence and associated factors for Entamoeba infections and evaluate the performance of PCR to differentiate Entamoeba complex species among diarrheal patient in Eastern region of Kenya. Stool samples were obtained from 400 patients attending Meru Teaching and Referral Hospital (MTRH) presenting with diarrhea. Samples were processed by direct wet mount using normal saline and iodine stain for microscopic examination. Entamoeba species differentiation was done using PCR targeting the 16S rRNA gene. A total of 33 (8.3%) samples had Entamoeba cysts/trophozoites by microscopy while 29 (7.3%) were identified as E. histolytica by PCR. Entamoeba infections was most common among adults 23 (5.8%) and in females 20(5%). The sensitivity of microscopy was 29/29 (100%; 95% CI 88.1% - 100%) with a specificity 367/371 (98.9%; 95% CI 97.3 % - 99.7%). In multivariate analysis, factors that independently influenced Entamoeba infection included sources of drinking water, use of toilet with water, regular use of soap or sanitizer, having diarrhea that persists for two weeks and stool consistency. Entamoeba infection was found to be responsible for most diarrhea condition especially among children. Patients hygienic and sanitation characteristics contributes significantly to Entamoeba infection. The performance of microscopy to detect Entamoeba infection is comparable to those of PCR except for the lack of species differentiation. Molecular species differentiation will improve disease diagnosis, control and management. Continuous monitoring of patient presenting with diarrhea for Entamoeba infection would improve treatment outcomes.","PeriodicalId":72969,"journal":{"name":"European journal of biology and biotechnology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of biology and biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbio.2022.3.1.304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Data on the epidemiology of Entamoeba infections in Eastern part of Kenya is scanty. Diagnostic tests in use have limited capacity to differentiate common infecting species. The performance of Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) to differentiate between pathogenic Entamoeba histolytica and two nonpathogenic species E. dispar and E. moshkovskii is largely undetermined. Therefore, this study sought to determine the prevalence and associated factors for Entamoeba infections and evaluate the performance of PCR to differentiate Entamoeba complex species among diarrheal patient in Eastern region of Kenya. Stool samples were obtained from 400 patients attending Meru Teaching and Referral Hospital (MTRH) presenting with diarrhea. Samples were processed by direct wet mount using normal saline and iodine stain for microscopic examination. Entamoeba species differentiation was done using PCR targeting the 16S rRNA gene. A total of 33 (8.3%) samples had Entamoeba cysts/trophozoites by microscopy while 29 (7.3%) were identified as E. histolytica by PCR. Entamoeba infections was most common among adults 23 (5.8%) and in females 20(5%). The sensitivity of microscopy was 29/29 (100%; 95% CI 88.1% - 100%) with a specificity 367/371 (98.9%; 95% CI 97.3 % - 99.7%). In multivariate analysis, factors that independently influenced Entamoeba infection included sources of drinking water, use of toilet with water, regular use of soap or sanitizer, having diarrhea that persists for two weeks and stool consistency. Entamoeba infection was found to be responsible for most diarrhea condition especially among children. Patients hygienic and sanitation characteristics contributes significantly to Entamoeba infection. The performance of microscopy to detect Entamoeba infection is comparable to those of PCR except for the lack of species differentiation. Molecular species differentiation will improve disease diagnosis, control and management. Continuous monitoring of patient presenting with diarrhea for Entamoeba infection would improve treatment outcomes.
肯尼亚东部腹泻患者中内阿米巴原虫的分子流行病学
肯尼亚东部地区内阿米巴感染的流行病学数据很少。正在使用的诊断测试对常见感染物种的区分能力有限。聚合酶链式反应(PCR)在区分致病性溶组织内阿米巴和两种非致病性物种E.dispar和E.moshkovskii方面的性能在很大程度上尚未确定。因此,本研究试图确定内阿米巴感染的流行率和相关因素,并评估PCR在肯尼亚东部地区腹泻患者中区分内阿米巴复杂物种的性能。从梅鲁教学和转诊医院(MTRH)的400名腹泻患者身上采集粪便样本。样品采用生理盐水和碘染剂直接湿悬法进行显微镜检查。使用靶向16S rRNA基因的PCR进行内阿米巴物种分化。共有33个(8.3%)样本通过显微镜检查具有内阿米巴囊肿/滋养体,而29个(7.3%)样本则通过PCR鉴定为溶组织大肠杆菌。内阿米巴感染在成人23人(5.8%)和女性20人(5%)中最为常见。显微镜检查的灵敏度为29/29(100%;95%CI 88.1%-100%),特异性为367/371(98.9%;95%CI 97.3%-99.7%)。在多变量分析中,独立影响内阿米巴感染的因素包括饮用水来源、使用带水的厕所、经常使用肥皂或消毒液、腹泻持续两周和粪便稠度。内阿米巴感染被发现是大多数腹泻的原因,尤其是在儿童中。患者的卫生和环境卫生特征对内阿米巴感染有重要影响。显微镜检测内阿米巴感染的性能与PCR相当,只是缺乏物种分化。分子物种分化将改善疾病的诊断、控制和管理。持续监测因内阿米巴感染而出现腹泻的患者将改善治疗结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信