‘The Science of Human Rights:’ American Abolitionism and the Language of Human Rights

IF 1 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
B. Parten
{"title":"‘The Science of Human Rights:’ American Abolitionism and the Language of Human Rights","authors":"B. Parten","doi":"10.1080/0144039X.2023.2173005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Historians of human rights have not had much to say about America’s anti-slavery movement. Scholars tend to focus instead on the early enlightenment or how ideas of human rights emerged over the twentieth century. This essay, however, makes a case for why American abolitionists should be considered early rights pioneers and progenitors of what we know as human rights. It argues that though different factions of the movement had particular conceptions of rights, the movement itself mobilized around a shared rights vision and made this vision of human rights a centre piece of America’s anti-slavery crusade. As a result, the essay intervenes in existing debates about how unified the abolitionists were and what made their thinking ‘modern,’ but it also speaks to the history of human rights by offering the field a new origin story to contend with.","PeriodicalId":46405,"journal":{"name":"Slavery & Abolition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Slavery & Abolition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0144039X.2023.2173005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Historians of human rights have not had much to say about America’s anti-slavery movement. Scholars tend to focus instead on the early enlightenment or how ideas of human rights emerged over the twentieth century. This essay, however, makes a case for why American abolitionists should be considered early rights pioneers and progenitors of what we know as human rights. It argues that though different factions of the movement had particular conceptions of rights, the movement itself mobilized around a shared rights vision and made this vision of human rights a centre piece of America’s anti-slavery crusade. As a result, the essay intervenes in existing debates about how unified the abolitionists were and what made their thinking ‘modern,’ but it also speaks to the history of human rights by offering the field a new origin story to contend with.
《人权科学:美国废奴主义与人权语言
研究人权的历史学家对美国的反奴隶制运动并没有太多评论。学者们倾向于关注早期启蒙运动,或者关注人权思想是如何在20世纪出现的。然而,这篇文章说明了为什么美国废奴主义者应该被视为早期的权利先驱和我们所知的人权的祖先。它认为,尽管该运动的不同派别对权利有着不同的概念,但该运动本身围绕着一个共同的权利愿景而动员起来,并使这一人权愿景成为美国反奴隶制运动的核心部分。因此,这篇文章介入了关于废奴主义者是如何统一的以及是什么使他们的思想“现代”的现有辩论,但它也通过为该领域提供一个新的起源故事来讲述人权的历史。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
28.60%
发文量
50
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信