On off-line and on-line Bayesian filtering for uncertainty quantification of structural deterioration

IF 2.4 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Antonios Kamariotis, Luca Sardi, I. Papaioannou, E. Chatzi, D. Štraub
{"title":"On off-line and on-line Bayesian filtering for uncertainty quantification of structural deterioration","authors":"Antonios Kamariotis, Luca Sardi, I. Papaioannou, E. Chatzi, D. Štraub","doi":"10.1017/dce.2023.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Data-informed predictive maintenance planning largely relies on stochastic deterioration models. Monitoring information can be utilized to update sequentially the knowledge on model parameters. In this context, on-line (recursive) Bayesian filtering algorithms typically fail to properly quantify the full posterior uncertainty of time-invariant model parameters. Off-line (batch) algorithms are—in principle—better suited for the uncertainty quantification task, yet they are computationally prohibitive in sequential settings. In this work, we adapt and investigate selected Bayesian filters for parameter estimation: an on-line particle filter, an on-line iterated batch importance sampling filter, which performs Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) move steps, and an off-line MCMC-based sequential Monte Carlo filter. A Gaussian mixture model approximates the posterior distribution within the resampling process in all three filters. Two numerical examples provide the basis for a comparative assessment. The first example considers a low-dimensional, nonlinear, non-Gaussian probabilistic fatigue crack growth model that is updated with sequential monitoring measurements. The second high-dimensional, linear, Gaussian example employs a random field to model corrosion deterioration across a beam, which is updated with sequential sensor measurements. The numerical investigations provide insights into the performance of off-line and on-line filters in terms of the accuracy of posterior estimates and the computational cost, when applied to problems of different nature, increasing dimensionality and varying sensor information amount. Importantly, they show that a tailored implementation of the on-line particle filter proves competitive with the computationally demanding MCMC-based filters. Suggestions on the choice of the appropriate method in function of problem characteristics are provided.","PeriodicalId":34169,"journal":{"name":"DataCentric Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DataCentric Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/dce.2023.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Abstract Data-informed predictive maintenance planning largely relies on stochastic deterioration models. Monitoring information can be utilized to update sequentially the knowledge on model parameters. In this context, on-line (recursive) Bayesian filtering algorithms typically fail to properly quantify the full posterior uncertainty of time-invariant model parameters. Off-line (batch) algorithms are—in principle—better suited for the uncertainty quantification task, yet they are computationally prohibitive in sequential settings. In this work, we adapt and investigate selected Bayesian filters for parameter estimation: an on-line particle filter, an on-line iterated batch importance sampling filter, which performs Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) move steps, and an off-line MCMC-based sequential Monte Carlo filter. A Gaussian mixture model approximates the posterior distribution within the resampling process in all three filters. Two numerical examples provide the basis for a comparative assessment. The first example considers a low-dimensional, nonlinear, non-Gaussian probabilistic fatigue crack growth model that is updated with sequential monitoring measurements. The second high-dimensional, linear, Gaussian example employs a random field to model corrosion deterioration across a beam, which is updated with sequential sensor measurements. The numerical investigations provide insights into the performance of off-line and on-line filters in terms of the accuracy of posterior estimates and the computational cost, when applied to problems of different nature, increasing dimensionality and varying sensor information amount. Importantly, they show that a tailored implementation of the on-line particle filter proves competitive with the computationally demanding MCMC-based filters. Suggestions on the choice of the appropriate method in function of problem characteristics are provided.
基于离线和在线贝叶斯滤波的结构劣化不确定性量化
摘要基于数据的预测性维修计划在很大程度上依赖于随机退化模型。可以利用监测信息来顺序地更新关于模型参数的知识。在这种情况下,在线(递归)贝叶斯滤波算法通常无法正确量化时不变模型参数的完全后验不确定性。离线(批处理)算法原则上更适合不确定性量化任务,但在顺序设置中,它们在计算上是禁止的。在这项工作中,我们调整并研究了用于参数估计的选定贝叶斯滤波器:在线粒子滤波器、执行马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗(MCMC)移动步骤的在线迭代批重要性采样滤波器,以及离线基于MCMC的序列蒙特卡罗滤波器。高斯混合模型近似于所有三个滤波器中的重采样过程中的后验分布。两个数值例子为比较评估提供了基础。第一个例子考虑了一个低维、非线性、非高斯概率疲劳裂纹扩展模型,该模型通过连续监测测量进行更新。第二个高维、线性、高斯示例使用随机场来模拟光束上的腐蚀劣化,并通过顺序传感器测量进行更新。当应用于不同性质、增加维度和改变传感器信息量的问题时,数值研究从后验估计的准确性和计算成本的角度深入了解了离线和在线滤波器的性能。重要的是,他们表明,在线粒子滤波器的定制实现证明与基于计算要求的MCMC滤波器具有竞争力。提出了根据问题特征选择适当方法的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
DataCentric Engineering
DataCentric Engineering Engineering-General Engineering
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信