Partial flexor carpi radialis tendon transfer technique for midcarpal instability

Hero J. A. Zijlker, K. Harmsen, S. Strackee
{"title":"Partial flexor carpi radialis tendon transfer technique for midcarpal instability","authors":"Hero J. A. Zijlker, K. Harmsen, S. Strackee","doi":"10.1177/1753193419889307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"demonstrated, however, that the knot outside the repair was stronger only early in the healing process; they found no difference between inside and outside knot repair strength 6 weeks after. Recently, a knotless, asymmetric repair was reported to be even stronger compared with the Lim/Tsai configuration, highlighting that the knot was the weakest link in flexor tendon repairs (Lim et al., 2018). There are several limitations to this study. First, we did not add an epitendinous suture to our repair configurations before testing. This was done on purpose to avoid extra variables when analysing the results, but might not truly reflect the flexor tendon repair configurations used in vivo. Second, this is a basic science study, and the ex vivo setup might not mimic the in vivo environment. The knot position outside of the repair zone might be more prone to adhesions compared with the inside position, whereas the inside position causes decreased tendon-to-tendon contact in vivo. Lastly, the repair constructs were loaded to failure and did not undergo cyclic testing.","PeriodicalId":73762,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hand surgery (Edinburgh, Scotland)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1753193419889307","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hand surgery (Edinburgh, Scotland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193419889307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

demonstrated, however, that the knot outside the repair was stronger only early in the healing process; they found no difference between inside and outside knot repair strength 6 weeks after. Recently, a knotless, asymmetric repair was reported to be even stronger compared with the Lim/Tsai configuration, highlighting that the knot was the weakest link in flexor tendon repairs (Lim et al., 2018). There are several limitations to this study. First, we did not add an epitendinous suture to our repair configurations before testing. This was done on purpose to avoid extra variables when analysing the results, but might not truly reflect the flexor tendon repair configurations used in vivo. Second, this is a basic science study, and the ex vivo setup might not mimic the in vivo environment. The knot position outside of the repair zone might be more prone to adhesions compared with the inside position, whereas the inside position causes decreased tendon-to-tendon contact in vivo. Lastly, the repair constructs were loaded to failure and did not undergo cyclic testing.
腕中部不稳的部分桡侧腕屈肌腱转移技术
然而,证明了修复外的结只在愈合过程的早期更强;6周后,他们发现内外结修复强度没有差异。最近,据报道,与Lim/Tsai配置相比,无结、不对称修复甚至更强,强调结是屈肌腱修复中最薄弱的环节(Lim等人,2018)。这项研究有几个局限性。首先,在测试之前,我们没有在我们的修复配置中添加外延缝线。这样做是为了在分析结果时避免额外的变量,但可能不能真实反映体内使用的屈肌腱修复配置。其次,这是一项基础科学研究,离体设置可能无法模拟体内环境。与修复区内部位置相比,结位在修复区外部可能更容易发生粘连,而在体内,结位在修复区内部会导致肌腱与肌腱之间的接触减少。最后,修复结构被加载到失败,没有进行循环测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信