{"title":"On a Vizing-type Integer Domination Conjecture","authors":"Randy Davila, E. Krop","doi":"10.20429/TAG.2020.070104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given a simple graph $G$, a dominating set in $G$ is a set of vertices $S$ such that every vertex not in $S$ has a neighbor in $S$. Denote the domination number, which is the size of any minimum dominating set of $G$, by $\\gamma(G)$. For any integer $k\\ge 1$, a function $f : V (G) \\rightarrow \\{0, 1, . . ., k\\}$ is called a \\emph{$\\{k\\}$-dominating function} if the sum of its function values over any closed neighborhood is at least $k$. The weight of a $\\{k\\}$-dominating function is the sum of its values over all the vertices. The $\\{k\\}$-domination number of $G$, $\\gamma_{\\{k\\}}(G)$, is defined to be the minimum weight taken over all $\\{k\\}$-domination functions. Bresar, Henning, and Klavžar (On integer domination in graphs and Vizing-like problems. \\emph{Taiwanese J. Math.} {10(5)} (2006) pp. 1317--1328) asked whether there exists an integer $k\\ge 2$ so that $\\gamma_{\\{k\\}}(G\\square H)\\ge \\gamma(G)\\gamma(H)$. In this note we use the Roman $\\{2\\}$-domination number, $\\gamma_{R2}$ of Chellali, Haynes, Hedetniemi, and McRae, (Roman $\\{2\\}$-domination. \\emph{Discrete Applied Mathematics} {204} (2016) pp. 22-28.) to prove that if $G$ is a claw-free graph and $H$ is an arbitrary graph, then $\\gamma_{\\{2\\}}(G\\square H)\\ge \\gamma_{R2}(G\\square H)\\ge \\gamma(G)\\gamma(H)$, which also implies the conjecture for all $k\\ge 2$.","PeriodicalId":37096,"journal":{"name":"Theory and Applications of Graphs","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and Applications of Graphs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20429/TAG.2020.070104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Given a simple graph $G$, a dominating set in $G$ is a set of vertices $S$ such that every vertex not in $S$ has a neighbor in $S$. Denote the domination number, which is the size of any minimum dominating set of $G$, by $\gamma(G)$. For any integer $k\ge 1$, a function $f : V (G) \rightarrow \{0, 1, . . ., k\}$ is called a \emph{$\{k\}$-dominating function} if the sum of its function values over any closed neighborhood is at least $k$. The weight of a $\{k\}$-dominating function is the sum of its values over all the vertices. The $\{k\}$-domination number of $G$, $\gamma_{\{k\}}(G)$, is defined to be the minimum weight taken over all $\{k\}$-domination functions. Bresar, Henning, and Klavžar (On integer domination in graphs and Vizing-like problems. \emph{Taiwanese J. Math.} {10(5)} (2006) pp. 1317--1328) asked whether there exists an integer $k\ge 2$ so that $\gamma_{\{k\}}(G\square H)\ge \gamma(G)\gamma(H)$. In this note we use the Roman $\{2\}$-domination number, $\gamma_{R2}$ of Chellali, Haynes, Hedetniemi, and McRae, (Roman $\{2\}$-domination. \emph{Discrete Applied Mathematics} {204} (2016) pp. 22-28.) to prove that if $G$ is a claw-free graph and $H$ is an arbitrary graph, then $\gamma_{\{2\}}(G\square H)\ge \gamma_{R2}(G\square H)\ge \gamma(G)\gamma(H)$, which also implies the conjecture for all $k\ge 2$.