Research on scientific research integrity cognition of medical scientific research management workers

Pengjun Zhang, Qiang Gao, B. Peng, Lingling Yu, Miao Miao
{"title":"Research on scientific research integrity cognition of medical scientific research management workers","authors":"Pengjun Zhang, Qiang Gao, B. Peng, Lingling Yu, Miao Miao","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-1924.2019.02.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo understand the status quo of scientific research integrity cognition and the satisfaction of scientific research integrity construction among medical research management workers. \n \n \nMethods \nThe questionnaire survey was conducted, 115 management workers for research and education from medical schools, research institutes and hospitals were surveyed, and statistic data analysis was conducted. \n \n \nResults \nThe average score of scientific research management workers' knowledge was (43.09±10.41), and the overall awareness rate was 46.77%; Factors that influencing the cognition of integrity include academic qualifications, professional titles, project hosting or participation, paper publication, paper reviewing, and project/science and technology achievement review experience. The overall satisfaction of the status quo of scientific research integrity construction were 41.65%. Medical research management workers thought that the main factors influencing scientific research integrity in medical field were academic evaluation system (81.74%), social environment (78.26%), personal achievement motivation (76.52%) and self-moral accomplishment (73.04%). \n \n \nConclusions \nThe cognition level of scientific research integrity of medical scientific research management workers is not enough, and the satisfaction of scientific research integrity construction should be improved. It is suggested to strengthen the training and learning of scientific research integrity knowledge of medical scientific research management workers, and enhance the integrity literacy and concept; departments at all levels working together to strengthen the construction of scientific research integrity, update the academic evaluation mechanism, and cultivate a good cultural atmosphere of scientific research integrity. \n \n \nKey words: \nMedicine; Scientific research management; Scientific research integrity; Cognition; Satisfaction","PeriodicalId":59555,"journal":{"name":"中华医学科研管理杂志","volume":"32 1","pages":"133-138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华医学科研管理杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-1924.2019.02.012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To understand the status quo of scientific research integrity cognition and the satisfaction of scientific research integrity construction among medical research management workers. Methods The questionnaire survey was conducted, 115 management workers for research and education from medical schools, research institutes and hospitals were surveyed, and statistic data analysis was conducted. Results The average score of scientific research management workers' knowledge was (43.09±10.41), and the overall awareness rate was 46.77%; Factors that influencing the cognition of integrity include academic qualifications, professional titles, project hosting or participation, paper publication, paper reviewing, and project/science and technology achievement review experience. The overall satisfaction of the status quo of scientific research integrity construction were 41.65%. Medical research management workers thought that the main factors influencing scientific research integrity in medical field were academic evaluation system (81.74%), social environment (78.26%), personal achievement motivation (76.52%) and self-moral accomplishment (73.04%). Conclusions The cognition level of scientific research integrity of medical scientific research management workers is not enough, and the satisfaction of scientific research integrity construction should be improved. It is suggested to strengthen the training and learning of scientific research integrity knowledge of medical scientific research management workers, and enhance the integrity literacy and concept; departments at all levels working together to strengthen the construction of scientific research integrity, update the academic evaluation mechanism, and cultivate a good cultural atmosphere of scientific research integrity. Key words: Medicine; Scientific research management; Scientific research integrity; Cognition; Satisfaction
医学科研管理工作者科研诚信认知研究
目的了解医学科研管理工作者科研诚信认知现状及科研诚信建设满意度。方法采用问卷调查法,对115名医学院校、科研院所和医院的科研、教育管理人员进行调查,并进行统计分析。结果科研管理工作者知识平均得分为(43.09±10.41)分,总体知晓率为46.77%;影响诚信认知的因素包括学历、职称、主持或参与项目、论文发表、论文评审、项目/科技成果评审经历。科研诚信建设现状总体满意度为41.65%。医学科研管理工作者认为影响医学领域科研诚信的主要因素是学术评价体系(81.74%)、社会环境(78.26%)、个人成就动机(76.52%)和自我道德修养(73.04%)。结论医学科研管理工作者对科研诚信的认知水平不足,科研诚信建设满意度有待提高。建议加强对医学科研管理工作者科研诚信知识的培训和学习,增强诚信素养和诚信观念;各级部门共同努力,加强科研诚信建设,更新学术评价机制,培育良好的科研诚信文化氛围。关键词:医学;科研管理;科研诚信;认知;满意度
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3322
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信