Investigating the condition of iron gall ink drawings: developing an assessment survey

IF 0.5 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
J. Kosek, C. Barry
{"title":"Investigating the condition of iron gall ink drawings: developing an assessment survey","authors":"J. Kosek, C. Barry","doi":"10.1080/19455224.2019.1656660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract It is well established that iron gall ink causes deterioration and embrittlement of paper in the presence of one or more risk factors, such as unstable ink components, high humidity and unsafe handling, with the ink changing colour from black to shades of brown. As iron gall ink has been the prevailing drawing medium in the West from medieval times to the eighteenth century, with its use declining into the twentieth century, monitoring the condition of iron gall ink drawings is of great concern to all custodians of graphic art collections. Selected iron gall ink drawings have been examined using visual methods in the British Museum Prints and Drawing collection to identify, assess and describe condition issues specific to the medium. This has led to the production of a reference catalogue of damage, which has underpinned this draft-design for a condition survey tool. This survey has then been developed with input from conservators at the Albertina, Vienna, Kupferstichkabinett Staatliche Museum zu Berlin, Musée du Louvre, Paris, Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam and the Statens Museum for Kunst, Copenhagen, based on the material from their collections. This article presents the pilot project used to test the survey alongside its initial validation and outcomes.","PeriodicalId":43004,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Institute of Conservation","volume":"42 1","pages":"191 - 209"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19455224.2019.1656660","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Institute of Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19455224.2019.1656660","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract It is well established that iron gall ink causes deterioration and embrittlement of paper in the presence of one or more risk factors, such as unstable ink components, high humidity and unsafe handling, with the ink changing colour from black to shades of brown. As iron gall ink has been the prevailing drawing medium in the West from medieval times to the eighteenth century, with its use declining into the twentieth century, monitoring the condition of iron gall ink drawings is of great concern to all custodians of graphic art collections. Selected iron gall ink drawings have been examined using visual methods in the British Museum Prints and Drawing collection to identify, assess and describe condition issues specific to the medium. This has led to the production of a reference catalogue of damage, which has underpinned this draft-design for a condition survey tool. This survey has then been developed with input from conservators at the Albertina, Vienna, Kupferstichkabinett Staatliche Museum zu Berlin, Musée du Louvre, Paris, Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam and the Statens Museum for Kunst, Copenhagen, based on the material from their collections. This article presents the pilot project used to test the survey alongside its initial validation and outcomes.
调查铁胆墨画的状况:开展评估调查
摘要:铁胆油墨在存在一种或多种危险因素(如油墨成分不稳定、高湿度和不安全处理)的情况下,会导致纸张变质和脆化,油墨的颜色会从黑色变为深浅的棕色。由于从中世纪到18世纪,铁胆墨一直是西方主要的绘画媒介,进入20世纪,铁胆墨的使用逐渐减少,因此监测铁胆墨绘画的状况是所有图形艺术收藏管理人非常关注的问题。选定的铁胆水墨画已经检查使用视觉方法在大英博物馆版画和绘画收藏,以确定,评估和描述条件问题具体到媒体。这导致了一份损坏参考目录的产生,该目录为状态调查工具的初步设计奠定了基础。这项调查是根据维也纳阿尔贝蒂娜博物馆、柏林国立博物馆、巴黎卢浮宫博物馆、阿姆斯特丹国立博物馆和哥本哈根国立艺术博物馆的文物保护人员提供的资料进行的。本文介绍了用于测试调查的试点项目及其初始验证和结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Institute of Conservation
Journal of the Institute of Conservation HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Institute of Conservation is the peer reviewed publication of the Institute of Conservation (Icon). As such, its aims reflect those of Icon, to advance knowledge and education in conservation and achieve the long term preservation and conservation of moveable and immoveable cultural heritage. The Journal provides a collective identity for conservators; it promotes and supports both the profession and professionalism. With international contributions on all aspects of conservation, it is an invaluable resource for the heritage sector. The specific aims of the Journal are to: 1. promote research, knowledge and understanding of cultural heritage conservation through its history, practice and theory 2. provide an international forum to enable and disseminate advances in research, knowledge and understanding relating to conservation and heritage 3. champion and support professional standards of heritage conservation in the UK and internationally 4. provide a permanent record of issues relating to conservation and heritage 5. be financially and operationally sustainable. To achieve these aims, the Journal invites contributions from all those involved in the conservation of cultural heritage and related activities. Areas of interest include understanding cultural heritage materials and their degradation; subject reviews and histories of cultural heritage materials and conservation treatments; new, innovative or improved approaches to conservation and collections care theory, practice, communication, management and training; case studies demonstrating new, innovative or improved approaches; and conservation in its wider context. Submitters are encouraged to demonstrate how their work is of practical application to conservation. To maintain professional standards and promote academic rigour, submissions of articles and shorter notices are subject to an anonymous peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信