Efficacy of different methods for preventing gastroesophageal bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis: comparative analysis

Q4 Medicine
F. Nazyrov, A. V. Devyatov, A. Babadjanov, U. Makhmudov, O. A. Omonov
{"title":"Efficacy of different methods for preventing gastroesophageal bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis: comparative analysis","authors":"F. Nazyrov, A. V. Devyatov, A. Babadjanov, U. Makhmudov, O. A. Omonov","doi":"10.16931/1995-5464.2022-2-31-38","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. To assess the clinical efficacy of preventing gastroesophageal bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis.Materials and methods. From 2008 to 2019, the surgical treatment of 710 patients with cirrhosis was considered. The long-term results of preventing gastroesophageal variceal rebleeding were studied in three groups of patients: portosystemic shunt placement (367 patients), total esophagogastric disconnection (62 patients), and endoscopic procedures (281 patients). Observation periods varied from 1 to 115 months.Results. The lowest rebleeding rate of 15.5% was observed following shunt placement (χ2 = 9.728; df = 2; р = 0.008), while the highest rate of 40.9% was observed following endoscopic treatment. By the 5th year of follow-up, only 37.5% of patients showed no signs of bleeding following endoscopic procedures. The percentage of patients who did not experience true gastroesophageal variceal rebleeding amounted to 44%, 76%, and 85% following shunt placement, total esophagogastric disconnection, and endoscopic procedures, respectively (p < 0.05).Conclusion. Irrespective of the selected procedure, all patients with cirrhosis suffer from portal rebleeding in the longterm period. However, the lowest rebleeding rate is observed following portosystemic shunt placement.","PeriodicalId":36549,"journal":{"name":"Annals of HPB Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of HPB Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16931/1995-5464.2022-2-31-38","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim. To assess the clinical efficacy of preventing gastroesophageal bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis.Materials and methods. From 2008 to 2019, the surgical treatment of 710 patients with cirrhosis was considered. The long-term results of preventing gastroesophageal variceal rebleeding were studied in three groups of patients: portosystemic shunt placement (367 patients), total esophagogastric disconnection (62 patients), and endoscopic procedures (281 patients). Observation periods varied from 1 to 115 months.Results. The lowest rebleeding rate of 15.5% was observed following shunt placement (χ2 = 9.728; df = 2; р = 0.008), while the highest rate of 40.9% was observed following endoscopic treatment. By the 5th year of follow-up, only 37.5% of patients showed no signs of bleeding following endoscopic procedures. The percentage of patients who did not experience true gastroesophageal variceal rebleeding amounted to 44%, 76%, and 85% following shunt placement, total esophagogastric disconnection, and endoscopic procedures, respectively (p < 0.05).Conclusion. Irrespective of the selected procedure, all patients with cirrhosis suffer from portal rebleeding in the longterm period. However, the lowest rebleeding rate is observed following portosystemic shunt placement.
不同方法预防肝硬化胃食管出血的疗效对比分析
目标评价肝硬化患者预防胃食管出血的临床疗效。材料和方法。从2008年到2019年,考虑了710名肝硬化患者的手术治疗。对三组患者预防胃食管静脉曲张再出血的长期结果进行了研究:门体分流术(367名患者)、食管胃完全断开术(62名患者)和内镜手术(281名患者)。观察期从1个月到115个月不等。后果分流术后再出血率最低,为15.5%(χ2=9.728;df=2;р=0.008),而内镜治疗后的再出血率最高,为40.9%。到随访的第5年,只有37.5%的患者在内镜手术后没有出血迹象。在分流术、食管胃完全断开术和内镜手术后,未经历真正的胃食管静脉曲张再出血的患者比例分别为44%、76%和85%(p<0.05)。结论:无论选择何种手术,所有肝硬化患者都会长期发生门脉再出血。然而,门体分流术后再出血率最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of HPB Surgery
Annals of HPB Surgery Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信