Romania: The Kris Procedures. A Brief Incursion in the Roma Community-Based Dispute Management Mechanism

IF 0.2 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
C. Chereji, Ciprian Sandu
{"title":"Romania: The Kris Procedures. A Brief Incursion in the Roma Community-Based Dispute Management Mechanism","authors":"C. Chereji, Ciprian Sandu","doi":"10.24193/CSQ.24.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Indigenous con lict management practices have seen a revival of scholarly interest in the last decades. Even if bias against them still exist in the academic and practitioners’ environments, they have slowly conquered ground as mediation and other ADR methods gained track as viable alternatives to the modern justice system of courts, judges and lawyers. In this paper we focus on discovering how Roma communities (probably one of the most misunderstood and stereotyped ethnic group in Europe) deal with con lict ranging from insult and theft all the way to kidnapping and murder. The Kris, as the traditional Roma court system is known, consists on a set of procedures that have strong similarities with both mediation and arbitration as known in the Western literature and practice, but with some notable particularities. The paper is based on interviews with krisinitori (peace judges in Romani language) and direct observation. It aims to unveil a system of practices based on rules and norms far away from the regular image of “uncivilized” and “lawless” the Roma hold in the mind of their European contemporaries.","PeriodicalId":55922,"journal":{"name":"Conflict Studies Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conflict Studies Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24193/CSQ.24.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Indigenous con lict management practices have seen a revival of scholarly interest in the last decades. Even if bias against them still exist in the academic and practitioners’ environments, they have slowly conquered ground as mediation and other ADR methods gained track as viable alternatives to the modern justice system of courts, judges and lawyers. In this paper we focus on discovering how Roma communities (probably one of the most misunderstood and stereotyped ethnic group in Europe) deal with con lict ranging from insult and theft all the way to kidnapping and murder. The Kris, as the traditional Roma court system is known, consists on a set of procedures that have strong similarities with both mediation and arbitration as known in the Western literature and practice, but with some notable particularities. The paper is based on interviews with krisinitori (peace judges in Romani language) and direct observation. It aims to unveil a system of practices based on rules and norms far away from the regular image of “uncivilized” and “lawless” the Roma hold in the mind of their European contemporaries.
罗马尼亚:克里斯程序。略论罗姆人社区纠纷管理机制
在过去的几十年里,土著冲突管理实践重新引起了学术界的兴趣。尽管学术界和实务界仍然存在对它们的偏见,但随着调解和其他ADR方法逐渐成为法院、法官和律师组成的现代司法体系的可行替代方案,它们已经慢慢占据了上风。在本文中,我们重点研究罗姆人社区(可能是欧洲最容易被误解和刻板印象的族群之一)如何处理从侮辱和盗窃到绑架和谋杀的各种冲突。传统的罗马法院系统被称为“Kris”,由一套程序组成,这些程序与西方文学和实践中众所周知的调解和仲裁非常相似,但也有一些显著的特殊性。这篇论文是基于对krisinitori(罗马语和平法官)的采访和直接观察。它旨在揭示一个基于规则和规范的实践体系,远离罗姆人在欧洲同时代人心目中的“不文明”和“无法无天”的常规形象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Conflict Studies Quarterly
Conflict Studies Quarterly POLITICAL SCIENCE-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信