Acoustic Lures Increase the Effectiveness of Catching Rare and Endangered Forest-Edge and Forest-Interior Bats

Pub Date : 2023-08-03 DOI:10.3161/15081109ACC2023.25.1.011
Ian Davidson-Watts, C. O'donnell
{"title":"Acoustic Lures Increase the Effectiveness of Catching Rare and Endangered Forest-Edge and Forest-Interior Bats","authors":"Ian Davidson-Watts, C. O'donnell","doi":"10.3161/15081109ACC2023.25.1.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Acoustic lures, using a range of bat social, feeding and distress calls, are being used increasingly to improve capture rates in surveys and ecological studies of bats globally. However, much information on their effectiveness is anecdotal. We tested the effectiveness of the Sussex Autobat acoustic lure system using a standard Bechstein's bat (Myotis bechsteinii) social call for catching two rare and endangered New Zealand bat species, the long-tailed bat (Chalinolobus tuberculatus) and lesser short-tailed bat (Mystacina tuberculata) during lactation and post-lactation periods. The long-tailed bat forages primarily along forest edges, whereas the lesser short-tailed bat forages largely within cluttered forest interiors. Harp traps were set in paired locations over 18 nights in each of the late-lactation and post-lactation periods with an equal treatment/control (lure/no lure) sampling design. Sixty-four long-tailed bats and 97 lesser short-tailed bats were captured, with 100% of long-tailed bats and 93% of short-tailed bats being caught while using acoustic lures. Lesser short-tailed bats were caught more frequently than long-tailed bats, perhaps reflecting the greater abundance of lesser short-tailed bats. Captures were biased towards juveniles and males in both species, regardless of sampling period. Capture rates using lures were about 100 times higher than catch-rates from ‘expert-placed’ traps. Further research is needed to determine (a) if calls of New Zealand bat species (or other calls) can be used to increase capture rates further, and (b) if capture rates of female bats can be improved.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3161/15081109ACC2023.25.1.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Acoustic lures, using a range of bat social, feeding and distress calls, are being used increasingly to improve capture rates in surveys and ecological studies of bats globally. However, much information on their effectiveness is anecdotal. We tested the effectiveness of the Sussex Autobat acoustic lure system using a standard Bechstein's bat (Myotis bechsteinii) social call for catching two rare and endangered New Zealand bat species, the long-tailed bat (Chalinolobus tuberculatus) and lesser short-tailed bat (Mystacina tuberculata) during lactation and post-lactation periods. The long-tailed bat forages primarily along forest edges, whereas the lesser short-tailed bat forages largely within cluttered forest interiors. Harp traps were set in paired locations over 18 nights in each of the late-lactation and post-lactation periods with an equal treatment/control (lure/no lure) sampling design. Sixty-four long-tailed bats and 97 lesser short-tailed bats were captured, with 100% of long-tailed bats and 93% of short-tailed bats being caught while using acoustic lures. Lesser short-tailed bats were caught more frequently than long-tailed bats, perhaps reflecting the greater abundance of lesser short-tailed bats. Captures were biased towards juveniles and males in both species, regardless of sampling period. Capture rates using lures were about 100 times higher than catch-rates from ‘expert-placed’ traps. Further research is needed to determine (a) if calls of New Zealand bat species (or other calls) can be used to increase capture rates further, and (b) if capture rates of female bats can be improved.
分享
查看原文
声音诱饵增加捕捉稀有和濒危森林边缘和森林内部蝙蝠的有效性
在全球蝙蝠的调查和生态研究中,利用一系列蝙蝠社交、进食和求救信号的声学诱饵越来越多地用于提高捕获率。然而,关于其有效性的很多信息都是道听途说。本研究利用贝希斯坦蝙蝠(Myotis bechsteinii)的社会叫声,在哺乳期和哺乳期捕捉两种珍稀濒危的新西兰蝙蝠——长尾蝙蝠(Chalinolobus tuberculatus)和小短尾蝙蝠(Mystacina tuberculata),测试了苏塞克斯Autobat声诱系统的有效性。长尾蝙蝠主要沿着森林边缘觅食,而较小的短尾蝙蝠主要在杂乱的森林内部觅食。在哺乳后期和哺乳后的18个晚上,在成对的地点设置竖琴陷阱,采用相同的处理/对照(诱饵/无诱饵)抽样设计。捕获64只长尾蝙蝠和97只小短尾蝙蝠,其中100%的长尾蝙蝠和93%的短尾蝙蝠是在使用声学诱饵时捕获的。较短的短尾蝙蝠比长尾蝙蝠被捕获的频率更高,这可能反映了较短的短尾蝙蝠的数量更多。无论采样周期如何,捕获都偏向于两种物种的幼鱼和雄鱼。使用诱饵的捕获率比“专家设置”陷阱的捕获率高出约100倍。需要进一步的研究来确定(a)是否可以使用新西兰蝙蝠的叫声(或其他叫声)来进一步提高捕获率,以及(b)是否可以提高雌性蝙蝠的捕获率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信