Relationship between cardiac ultrasound findings during cardiopulmonary resuscitation with the outcome of patients

Q3 Nursing
Javad Seyedhosseini, Rasha Ahmadi, E. Karimialavijeh, Mehrad Aghili
{"title":"Relationship between cardiac ultrasound findings during cardiopulmonary resuscitation with the outcome of patients","authors":"Javad Seyedhosseini, Rasha Ahmadi, E. Karimialavijeh, Mehrad Aghili","doi":"10.34172/jept.2022.32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Cardiopulmonary arrest is a devastating outcome of some clinical situations and requires strict implementation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) protocols. Since ultrasound is one of the recommended tools to determine the presence of cardiac movements and may be a predictor of the outcome, this study examined the relationship between echocardiographic findings during CPR with patients’ outcomes. Methods: This cross-sectional prospective observational study was conducted on patients with cardio-respiratory arrest in the emergency department of Shariaty hospital during 2019. sampling method was random. Echocardiography was done at the patient’s bedside during the CPR process in accordance with the last advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) guidelines, on two points, after the end of the second and 10th minutes from the start of CPR. The echocardiography findings (cardiac movement vs standstill) were recorded, and patient outcomes were followed. Thirty-two patients enrolled in this study with a mean age of 56.9±15.3 years. Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to calculate the association between heart contractions during resuscitation and the outcomes via SPSS V.22. Fisher’s exact test and Kruskal-Wallis test were used to evaluate the relationship between heart rhythm in the second and tenth minutes with the outcomes of CPR. Results: The presence of cardiac movement in the 10th minute of CPR, in contrast to the findings of the second minute, had a significant correlation with the success rate of CPR and outcomes (P<0.05). Moreover, patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF) cardiac rhythm had a better resuscitation rate, 24-hour survival rate, and better outcome than patients with other cardiac rhythms and asystole (P<0.05). Conclusion: Echocardiographic findings in the 10th minute of the CPR process can be used as a prognostic factor for cardiac arrest.","PeriodicalId":36499,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Practice and Trauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Practice and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/jept.2022.32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Cardiopulmonary arrest is a devastating outcome of some clinical situations and requires strict implementation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) protocols. Since ultrasound is one of the recommended tools to determine the presence of cardiac movements and may be a predictor of the outcome, this study examined the relationship between echocardiographic findings during CPR with patients’ outcomes. Methods: This cross-sectional prospective observational study was conducted on patients with cardio-respiratory arrest in the emergency department of Shariaty hospital during 2019. sampling method was random. Echocardiography was done at the patient’s bedside during the CPR process in accordance with the last advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) guidelines, on two points, after the end of the second and 10th minutes from the start of CPR. The echocardiography findings (cardiac movement vs standstill) were recorded, and patient outcomes were followed. Thirty-two patients enrolled in this study with a mean age of 56.9±15.3 years. Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to calculate the association between heart contractions during resuscitation and the outcomes via SPSS V.22. Fisher’s exact test and Kruskal-Wallis test were used to evaluate the relationship between heart rhythm in the second and tenth minutes with the outcomes of CPR. Results: The presence of cardiac movement in the 10th minute of CPR, in contrast to the findings of the second minute, had a significant correlation with the success rate of CPR and outcomes (P<0.05). Moreover, patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF) cardiac rhythm had a better resuscitation rate, 24-hour survival rate, and better outcome than patients with other cardiac rhythms and asystole (P<0.05). Conclusion: Echocardiographic findings in the 10th minute of the CPR process can be used as a prognostic factor for cardiac arrest.
心肺复苏过程中的心脏超声表现与患者预后的关系
目的:心肺骤停是一些临床情况下的毁灭性后果,需要严格执行心肺复苏(CPR)方案。由于超声是确定心脏运动存在的推荐工具之一,并且可能是结果的预测因素,本研究检查了心肺复苏过程中超声心动图检查结果与患者结果之间的关系。方法:这项横断面前瞻性观察研究于2019年在Shariaty医院急诊科对心肺骤停患者进行。抽样方法为随机抽样。在心肺复苏过程中,根据上一次高级心脏生命支持(ACLS)指南,在心肺切除术开始后第二分钟和第十分钟结束后的两个点上,在患者床边进行超声心动图检查。记录超声心动图检查结果(心脏运动与静止),并跟踪患者的预后。32名患者参加了这项研究,平均年龄为56.9±15.3岁。卡方检验和Mann-Whitney U检验用于通过SPSS V.22计算复苏期间心脏收缩与结果之间的关联。Fisher精确测试和Kruskal-Wallis测试用于评估第二分钟和第十分钟的心律与心肺复苏结果之间的关系。结果:与第2分钟相比,心肺复苏术第10分钟的心脏运动与心肺复苏的成功率和结果有显著相关性(P<0.05)。此外,室性心动过速(VT)/心室颤动(VF)心律患者的复苏率、24小时生存率、,结论:心肺复苏术后第10分钟的超声心动图检查结果可作为判断心脏骤停的预后因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Emergency Practice and Trauma
Journal of Emergency Practice and Trauma Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信