Yuling Yan, Yue Han, Bin Liu, J. Du, Jing Wang, X. Jing, Ya-jie Liu, Songbai Deng, Jianlin Du, Yingrui Li, Q. She
{"title":"Optimal Blood Pressure Control Target for Older Patients with Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Yuling Yan, Yue Han, Bin Liu, J. Du, Jing Wang, X. Jing, Ya-jie Liu, Songbai Deng, Jianlin Du, Yingrui Li, Q. She","doi":"10.15212/cvia.2023.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nObjective: This study evaluated the optimal systolic blood pressure (SBP) target for older patients with hypertension.\n\nMethod: A Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted. The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed by using a modified version of the Cochrane risk of bias. The trial outcomes comprised the following clinical events: major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, heart failure and stroke.\n\nResults: A total of six trials were included. We reclassified all treatment therapies into three conditions according to the final achieved SBP after intervention (<130 mmHg, 130–139 mmHg and ≥140 mmHg). Our results demonstrated that anti-hypertensive treatment with an SBP target <130 mmHg, compared with treatment with an SBP target ≥140 mmHg, significantly decreased the incidence of MACE (OR 0.43, 95%CI 0.19–0.76), but no statistical difference was found in other comparisons. Although the results showed a trend toward more intensive anti-hypertension therapy having better effects on preventing cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and stroke, no significant differences were found among groups.\n\nConclusions: Our meta-analysis suggested that SBP <130 mmHg might be the optimal BP control target for patients ≥60 years of age; however, further evidence is required to support our findings.","PeriodicalId":41559,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Innovations and Applications","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Innovations and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15212/cvia.2023.0008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study evaluated the optimal systolic blood pressure (SBP) target for older patients with hypertension.
Method: A Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted. The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed by using a modified version of the Cochrane risk of bias. The trial outcomes comprised the following clinical events: major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, heart failure and stroke.
Results: A total of six trials were included. We reclassified all treatment therapies into three conditions according to the final achieved SBP after intervention (<130 mmHg, 130–139 mmHg and ≥140 mmHg). Our results demonstrated that anti-hypertensive treatment with an SBP target <130 mmHg, compared with treatment with an SBP target ≥140 mmHg, significantly decreased the incidence of MACE (OR 0.43, 95%CI 0.19–0.76), but no statistical difference was found in other comparisons. Although the results showed a trend toward more intensive anti-hypertension therapy having better effects on preventing cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and stroke, no significant differences were found among groups.
Conclusions: Our meta-analysis suggested that SBP <130 mmHg might be the optimal BP control target for patients ≥60 years of age; however, further evidence is required to support our findings.