Human Development and Controlled Substance Prescribing in Ohio Counties

P. Factor, Wallace Chambers, JoAnna “Anna” C. S. Kauffman, Tunu Kinebrew, Natasha Yonley, Ross M. Kauffman
{"title":"Human Development and Controlled Substance Prescribing in Ohio Counties","authors":"P. Factor, Wallace Chambers, JoAnna “Anna” C. S. Kauffman, Tunu Kinebrew, Natasha Yonley, Ross M. Kauffman","doi":"10.18061/ojph.v2i2.9031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Human development is a holistic measure of well-being. The American Human Development Index (AHDI) operationalizes the concept for the American context, using a composite measure of income, education, and health. This work presents the first county-level examination of AHDI for the state of Ohio and examines the relationship between human development and controlled substance prescribing.Methods: Publicly available data from the census and prior publications were compiled to calculate county-level AHDI for all 88 Ohio counties. Correlations were examined between AHDI and 4 classes of controlled substances, opioids, benzodiazepines, stimulants, and sedatives, using Pearson product moment correlation coefficient.Results: County AHDI scores ranged from 3.3 to 7.6, with mean and median values of 4.8. At the county level, human development is negatively correlated with opioid (r = -0.46, r2 = 0.22, P <0.0001) and benzodiazepine (r = -0.43, r2 = 0.18, P <0.0001) prescribing and positively associated with stimulant prescribing (r = 0.49, r2 = 0.24, P <0.0001). Neither sedative prescribing practices (r = 0.09, P = 0.40) nor median age (r = -0.09, P = 0.41) were significantly correlated with AHDI.Conclusion: There is a strong correlation between AHDI and prescribing of several classes of controlled substanc-es. Work remains to ascertain mechanisms and directionality of these relationships. Whether higher prescribing in areas with lower human development is an attempt to medicate health inequity or low human development is an additional manifestation of the opioid epidemic, this study underscores the necessity of pursuing equity in all policies.","PeriodicalId":74337,"journal":{"name":"Ohio journal of public health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ohio journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18061/ojph.v2i2.9031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Human development is a holistic measure of well-being. The American Human Development Index (AHDI) operationalizes the concept for the American context, using a composite measure of income, education, and health. This work presents the first county-level examination of AHDI for the state of Ohio and examines the relationship between human development and controlled substance prescribing.Methods: Publicly available data from the census and prior publications were compiled to calculate county-level AHDI for all 88 Ohio counties. Correlations were examined between AHDI and 4 classes of controlled substances, opioids, benzodiazepines, stimulants, and sedatives, using Pearson product moment correlation coefficient.Results: County AHDI scores ranged from 3.3 to 7.6, with mean and median values of 4.8. At the county level, human development is negatively correlated with opioid (r = -0.46, r2 = 0.22, P <0.0001) and benzodiazepine (r = -0.43, r2 = 0.18, P <0.0001) prescribing and positively associated with stimulant prescribing (r = 0.49, r2 = 0.24, P <0.0001). Neither sedative prescribing practices (r = 0.09, P = 0.40) nor median age (r = -0.09, P = 0.41) were significantly correlated with AHDI.Conclusion: There is a strong correlation between AHDI and prescribing of several classes of controlled substanc-es. Work remains to ascertain mechanisms and directionality of these relationships. Whether higher prescribing in areas with lower human development is an attempt to medicate health inequity or low human development is an additional manifestation of the opioid epidemic, this study underscores the necessity of pursuing equity in all policies.
俄亥俄州各县的人类发展和管制药物处方
背景:人类发展是福祉的整体衡量标准。美国人类发展指数(AHDI)使用收入、教育和健康的综合衡量标准,将这一概念应用于美国的情况。这项工作提出了俄亥俄州AHDI的第一个县级检查,并审查了人类发展与管制药物处方之间的关系。方法:收集来自人口普查和先前出版物的公开数据,计算俄亥俄州所有88个县的县级AHDI。采用Pearson积矩相关系数检验AHDI与4类受控物质(阿片类药物、苯二氮卓类药物、兴奋剂和镇静剂)的相关性。结果:县AHDI评分范围为3.3 ~ 7.6,平均和中位数为4.8。在县域范围内,人类发展水平与阿片类药物(r = -0.46, r2 = 0.22, P <0.0001)和苯二氮卓类药物(r = -0.43, r2 = 0.18, P <0.0001)处方呈负相关,与兴奋剂处方呈正相关(r = 0.49, r2 = 0.24, P <0.0001)。镇静剂处方做法(r = 0.09, P = 0.40)和中位年龄(r = -0.09, P = 0.41)与AHDI均无显著相关。结论:AHDI与几类管制药品的处方有较强的相关性。工作仍需确定这些关系的机制和方向。无论在人类发展水平较低的地区开更多的处方是为了治疗健康不平等,还是人类发展水平较低是阿片类药物流行的另一种表现,这项研究都强调了在所有政策中追求公平的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信