Weed Control Strategies for Restoration of the Atlantic Forest in the State of Rio de Janeiro - Brazil

Q4 Social Sciences
Alysson Canabrava Lisboa, C. G. D. Silva, Alinne Rocha Santos, J. G. S. Santana, L. F. D. S. Antunes, P. S. S. Leles
{"title":"Weed Control Strategies for Restoration of the Atlantic Forest in the State of Rio de Janeiro - Brazil","authors":"Alysson Canabrava Lisboa, C. G. D. Silva, Alinne Rocha Santos, J. G. S. Santana, L. F. D. S. Antunes, P. S. S. Leles","doi":"10.21664/2238-8869.2023v12i2.p129-143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective was to evaluate the best weed control strategy, for the formation of forest stands in Atlantic Forest, Brazil, aiming at restoration in an area dominated by Urochloa decumbes, evaluating the biological indicators and costs. It also sought to verify the magnitude of response of mechanical control compared to treatment without intervention, for similar sites where the experiment was installed and conducted. The treatments were: T1 - mechanical (mowing and crowning); T2 - chemical (application of glyphosate syrup); T3 - mechanical cultural (weeding, seeding and cultivation of Cajanus cajan and Canavalia ensiformes); T4 - chemical cultural (application of glyphosate, seeding and cultivation of legumes); T5 - absolute control (no intervention after planting). Activities and evaluations were carried out up to 30 months after planting the seedlings of the five species used. It was observed that in all treatments the survival of the plants reached values higher than 80%, at 6 and 18 months after planting. It was found that, on average, the tree plants in T2, T3, and T4 showed significantly higher growth than those in T1 and T5, which did not differ. The control with glyphosate is indicated for areas with predominance of Urochloa sp. Strategy control with glyphosate and cultivation of herbaceous legumes has potential use and needs adjustments to reduce costs. Also, that the control with mowing and crowning is not indicated due to the high cost and not favoring the growth of the planted trees, because it did not show significant differences in relation to the controls.","PeriodicalId":37865,"journal":{"name":"Fronteiras","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fronteiras","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21664/2238-8869.2023v12i2.p129-143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective was to evaluate the best weed control strategy, for the formation of forest stands in Atlantic Forest, Brazil, aiming at restoration in an area dominated by Urochloa decumbes, evaluating the biological indicators and costs. It also sought to verify the magnitude of response of mechanical control compared to treatment without intervention, for similar sites where the experiment was installed and conducted. The treatments were: T1 - mechanical (mowing and crowning); T2 - chemical (application of glyphosate syrup); T3 - mechanical cultural (weeding, seeding and cultivation of Cajanus cajan and Canavalia ensiformes); T4 - chemical cultural (application of glyphosate, seeding and cultivation of legumes); T5 - absolute control (no intervention after planting). Activities and evaluations were carried out up to 30 months after planting the seedlings of the five species used. It was observed that in all treatments the survival of the plants reached values higher than 80%, at 6 and 18 months after planting. It was found that, on average, the tree plants in T2, T3, and T4 showed significantly higher growth than those in T1 and T5, which did not differ. The control with glyphosate is indicated for areas with predominance of Urochloa sp. Strategy control with glyphosate and cultivation of herbaceous legumes has potential use and needs adjustments to reduce costs. Also, that the control with mowing and crowning is not indicated due to the high cost and not favoring the growth of the planted trees, because it did not show significant differences in relation to the controls.
巴西里约热内卢州大西洋森林恢复的杂草控制策略
目的是评价巴西大西洋森林林分形成的最佳杂草控制策略,并评价其生物指标和成本。它还试图验证机械控制与不干预处理相比的响应程度,在类似的地点安装和进行实验。处理方式为:T1 -机械处理(刈割和冠植);T2 -化学(使用草甘膦糖浆);T3 -机械栽培(Cajanus cajan和Canavalia ensiformes的除草、播种和栽培);T4 -化学栽培(草甘膦的施用,豆科植物的播种和栽培);T5 -绝对控制(种植后不干预)。活动和评价是在种植所使用的五种植物的幼苗后30个月进行的。在种植后6个月和18个月,所有处理的植株成活率均高于80%。结果发现,平均而言,T2、T3和T4的树木生长显著高于T1和T5,但差异不显著。草甘膦防治适用于褐藻占优势的地区。草甘膦防治和种植草本豆科植物具有潜在的用途,但需要调整以降低成本。此外,由于成本高且不利于种植树木的生长,没有表明割草和冠的对照,因为它与对照相比没有显示出显着差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fronteiras
Fronteiras Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: FRONTEIRAS: JOURNAL OF SOCIAL, TECHNOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE is an open-access, quarterly, peer-reviewed publication maintained by the Graduate Studies in Social, Technological and Environmental Science of the University Center of Anápolis (PPG STMA), with masters and doctoral degrees in Environmental Sciences. Fronteiras is an interdisciplinary journal that is driven by the belief that all types of knowledge must be available. It has as a target the researchers who dialogue in an interdisciplinary way with the theme "social and environmental science". The journal aims to publish original research, recognized rigorously for its theoretical-methodological, intellectual and scientific relevance. Fronteira has as the main theme of its publications the environmental science, aiming the scientific dissemination arising from the dialogues between the natural and human sciences and their connections with environmental science. Fronteiras: Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science has as its mission to publish and disseminate among the academic community, scientific manuscripts that are original and contribute to the promotion of multidisciplinary dialogues between the natural and human sciences and their connections with technological innovation, health as well as the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信