Use of Intermittent Aortic Balloon Occlusion: Report from the ABO Trauma Registry

IF 0.2 Q4 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
J. Buitendag, S. Variawa, Aashish Diayar, Pieter Snyders, Pieter Rademan, N. Allopi, D. McGreevy, T. Horer, G. Oosthuizen, ABO Trauma Registry Group
{"title":"Use of Intermittent Aortic Balloon Occlusion: Report from the ABO Trauma Registry","authors":"J. Buitendag, S. Variawa, Aashish Diayar, Pieter Snyders, Pieter Rademan, N. Allopi, D. McGreevy, T. Horer, G. Oosthuizen, ABO Trauma Registry Group","doi":"10.26676/jevtm.275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) is a helpful adjunct in the managementof hemorrhagic shock due to bleeding in the abdomen or pelvis. Ischemia distal to the occlusion is a concern;intermittent aortic balloon inflation (i-REBOA) is a novel way to achieve decreased ischemia time.Methods: This study was conducted using data from the multinational ABO Trauma Registry. All patients enteredbetween January 2016 and December 2019 were included.Results: The sample consisted of 157 patients. There were 57 patients in the i-REBOA group (36%) and 100 in theREBOA group (64%). The groups were similar in gender (P = 0.50), age (P = 0.17), mechanism of injury (P = 0.42), andinjury severity score (P = 0.13). The levels of international normalized ratio (INR) (P < 0.01), activated partial thromboplastintime (aPTT) (P < 0.01) and lactate (P = 0.02) were higher in the i-REBOA group. Total balloon inflation times werelonger in the i-REBOA group (P < 0.01). Major complication rates did not differ between groups. Mortality rates betweengroups were similar in the Emergency Department (ED) (3.8% for i-REBOA vs 10.1%; P = 0.17), within 24 hours (43.4% fori-REBOA vs 38.2%; P = 0.54), and at 30 days (63.6% for i-REBOA vs 48.4%; P = 0.07).Conclusions: The data from this registry show that i-REBOA is currently being used and may allow for longer totalballoon inflation times without higher morbidity or mortality rates.","PeriodicalId":41233,"journal":{"name":"Journal of EndoVascular Resuscitation and Trauma Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of EndoVascular Resuscitation and Trauma Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26676/jevtm.275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) is a helpful adjunct in the managementof hemorrhagic shock due to bleeding in the abdomen or pelvis. Ischemia distal to the occlusion is a concern;intermittent aortic balloon inflation (i-REBOA) is a novel way to achieve decreased ischemia time.Methods: This study was conducted using data from the multinational ABO Trauma Registry. All patients enteredbetween January 2016 and December 2019 were included.Results: The sample consisted of 157 patients. There were 57 patients in the i-REBOA group (36%) and 100 in theREBOA group (64%). The groups were similar in gender (P = 0.50), age (P = 0.17), mechanism of injury (P = 0.42), andinjury severity score (P = 0.13). The levels of international normalized ratio (INR) (P < 0.01), activated partial thromboplastintime (aPTT) (P < 0.01) and lactate (P = 0.02) were higher in the i-REBOA group. Total balloon inflation times werelonger in the i-REBOA group (P < 0.01). Major complication rates did not differ between groups. Mortality rates betweengroups were similar in the Emergency Department (ED) (3.8% for i-REBOA vs 10.1%; P = 0.17), within 24 hours (43.4% fori-REBOA vs 38.2%; P = 0.54), and at 30 days (63.6% for i-REBOA vs 48.4%; P = 0.07).Conclusions: The data from this registry show that i-REBOA is currently being used and may allow for longer totalballoon inflation times without higher morbidity or mortality rates.
间歇性主动脉球囊闭塞的使用:来自ABO创伤登记处的报告
背景:复苏性血管内球囊闭塞主动脉(REBOA)是治疗腹部或骨盆出血性休克的一种有用辅助手段。闭塞远端的缺血是一个令人担忧的问题;间歇性主动脉球囊扩张(i-REBOA)是一种缩短缺血时间的新方法。方法:本研究采用跨国ABO创伤登记处的数据进行。包括2016年1月至2019年12月期间入院的所有患者。结果:样本包括157名患者。i-REBOA组有57名患者(36%),REOA组有100名患者(64%)。两组在性别(P=0.50)、年龄(P=0.17)、损伤机制(P=0.42)和损伤严重程度评分(P=0.13)方面相似。i-REBOA组的国际标准化比值(INR)(P<0.01)、活化部分凝血活酶(aPTT)(P>0.01)和乳酸(P=0.02)水平较高。i-REBOA组的总球囊扩张时间较长(P<0.01)。主要并发症发生率在各组之间没有差异。两组之间的死亡率在急诊科(ED)相似(i-REBOA为3.8%对10.1%;P=0.17)、24小时内相似(i-REBOA为43.4%对38.2%;P=0.54),30天时(i-REBOA为63.6%,48.4%;P=0.07)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信